Distance teaching of experimental scientific methodology and scientific thinking

被引:3
|
作者
Assinger, Alice [1 ]
Grasl, Matthaus [2 ]
Volf, Ivo [3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Wien, Inst Gefassbiol & Thromboseforsch, Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Wien, Univ Klin Hals Nasen & Ohrenkrankheiten, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Wien, Inst Physiol, Schwarzspanierstr 17, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
来源
GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION | 2021年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
distance teaching; scientific thinking and reasoning; flow cytometry; biochemical methods;
D O I
10.3205/zma001411
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this project was to convert a traditional face-to-face seminar for the teaching of experimental scientific methodology to remote teaching in a timely manner due to the COVID-19 related restrictions to teaching in presence. Methodology: The main focus of the course was on flow cytometry. Basics were developed in a virtual presence phase. Specific teaching contents were taught by an interactive presentation, which came very close to the user experience of a flow cytometer and interactively illustrated the influence of different experimental conditions on the obtained results. Video sequences of authentic sample acquisitions were integrated into Adobe Captivate (R). These "virtual acquisitions" were not distinguishable from the original procedure. For interpretation of the resulting diagrams, interactions were inserted, which allowed direct comparison of the obtained results. Implementation: A presentation with interactive elements and video sequences was created and used for the virtual presence phases. After publishing on a web server in HTML 5, contents were made available to the students for post-processing of learning contents by self-paced learning with full (interactive) functionality. Conclusion: Contributions elaborated by the students during the course demonstrate a learning outcome comparable to that archieved in the last years in presence mode. While implementation of this solution represented a highly time-consuming process, narrative feedback was consistently positive. Due to the short time available for implementation, no systematic evaluation could be conducted, which represents a clear limitation of this work.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SCIENTIFIC THINKING SKILLS: TEACHING STRATEGY BASED ON PRACTICAL WORK
    Vargas Guerrero, Martha Andrea
    Cifuentes Arcila, Maria Cristina
    REVISTA CIENTIFICA, 2011, (13): : 283 - 288
  • [22] Scientific and non-scientific thinking (German)
    Chertkova, EL
    VOPROSY FILOSOFII, 1997, (03) : 155 - 157
  • [23] Conceptual review on scientific reasoning and scientific thinking
    Diaz, Carlos
    Dorner, Birgit
    Hussmann, Heinrich
    Strijbos, Jan-Willem
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (06) : 4313 - 4325
  • [24] Conceptual review on scientific reasoning and scientific thinking
    Carlos Díaz
    Birgit Dorner
    Heinrich Hussmann
    Jan-Willem Strijbos
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 4313 - 4325
  • [25] Ghost Hunting as a Means to Illustrate Scientific Methodology and Enhance Critical Thinking
    Rockwell, Steven C.
    COMMUNICATION TEACHER, 2012, 26 (03) : 158 - 162
  • [26] Teaching Scientific Content through a Methodology Based on Escape Room
    Yllana-Prieto, Felix
    Gonzalez-Gomez, David
    Jeong, Jin Su
    ENSENANZA DE LAS CIENCIAS, 2023, 41 (03): : 69 - 88
  • [27] MEASURING SCIENTIFIC THINKING
    Noll, Victor H.
    TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 1934, 35 (08): : 685 - 693
  • [28] The evolution of scientific thinking
    Rachel Wood
    Nature, 2005, 435 (7038) : 25 - 27
  • [29] ON THE LIMITS OF SCIENTIFIC THINKING
    DUNBAR, R
    NEW SCIENTIST, 1988, 119 (1629) : 83 - 83
  • [30] THE HABIT OF SCIENTIFIC THINKING
    Noll, Victor H.
    TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 1933, 35 (01): : 1 - 9