Mechanisms of drug-DNA recognition distinguished by Raman spectroscopy

被引:10
|
作者
Benevides, James M. [1 ]
Kawakami, Jessica [1 ]
Thomas, George J., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Biol Sci, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
关键词
DNA; ethidium bromide; proflavine; 9-aminoacridine; structure; recognition; Raman spectroscopy;
D O I
10.1002/jrs.2049
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
The highly chromophoric drugs, ethidium bromide (EtBr), 9-aminoacridine (9AA) and proflavine (PF) (3,6-diaminoacridine) bind to DNA by insertion of a polycyclic aromatic ring between adjacent base pairs of the double helix. Despite similar intercalative mechanisms, these drugs exhibit distinct DNA affinities and produce characteristic mutagenic effects. Complexes of the intercalants with small nucleotide fragments have been investigated by various methods, including X-ray crystallography. However, the structural impact of drug intercalation on a DNA molecule of genetic consequence has not yet been reported. Here, we employ near-infrared laser excitation (752 nm) and a DNA target of genomic size to obtain and compare Raman spectra of complexes of EtBr, 9AA and PF with DNA. Raman signatures of solution complexes have been analyzed by difference methods to reveal the specific structural changes induced at the drug/DNA intercalation sites. Perturbation of the DNA backbone geometry, as reflected in the Raman marker diagnostic of the phosphodiester group (800-880 cm(-1)), ranges from disruption of the B-form duplex in favor of either the A-form duplex, or separated strands, or a combination of altered DNA backbone geometries. The acridine intercalants, PF and 9AA, also perturb hydrogen-bonding interactions between the paired bases of duplex DNA, although in distinct ways. Conversely, base pairing is relatively unperturbed by ethidium intercalation. The results are discussed in relation to frameshift mutagenic activities of the intercalating drugs. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1627 / 1634
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SPECTROSCOPY OF DRUG-DNA INTERACTIONS
    MANFAIT, M
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 1985, 5 (06) : 585 - 585
  • [2] Drug-DNA recognition: energetics and implications for design
    Haq, I
    Ladbury, J
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR RECOGNITION, 2000, 13 (04) : 188 - 197
  • [3] Drug binding to DNA: Observation of the drug-DNA hydrogen-bond-stretching modes of netropsin bound to DNA via Raman spectroscopy
    Lee, SA
    Rupprecht, A
    Chen, YZ
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 80 (10) : 2241 - 2244
  • [4] Cooperativity in drug-DNA recognition: A molecular dynamics study
    Harris, SA
    Gavathiotis, E
    Searle, MS
    Orozco, M
    Laughton, CA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 123 (50) : 12658 - 12663
  • [5] DRUG-DNA INTERACTIONS
    KRUGH, TR
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 4 (03) : 351 - 364
  • [6] Drug-DNA interactions
    Chaires, JB
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (03) : 314 - 320
  • [7] Calicheamicin-DNA recognition: An analysis of seven different drug-DNA complexes
    Kalben, A
    Pal, S
    Andreotti, AH
    Walker, S
    Gange, D
    Biswas, K
    Kahne, D
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 122 (35) : 8403 - 8412
  • [8] Sequence and Chiral Selectivity of Drug-DNA Interactions Revealed by Force Spectroscopy
    Hu, Qiongzheng
    Xu, Shoujun
    ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2014, 53 (51) : 14135 - 14138
  • [9] Indirect readout in drug-DNA recognition:: role of sequence-dependent DNA conformation
    Arauzo-Bravo, Marcos J.
    Sarai, Akinori
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2008, 36 (02) : 376 - 386
  • [10] PHASING IN DRUG-DNA SEQUENCE RECOGNITION: STRUCTURE OF A TRIS (BENZIMIDAZOLE) - DNA COMPLEX.
    Neidle, Stephen
    Clark, George R.
    Gray, Emily J.
    Li, Yu-Hua
    Leupin, Werner
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 1996, 52 : C150 - C150