Transient radicular irritation after bupivacaine spinal anesthesia

被引:0
|
作者
Tarkkila, P [1 ]
Huhtala, J [1 ]
Tuominen, M [1 ]
Lindgren, L [1 ]
机构
[1] HELSINKI UNIV,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,DEPT SURG 4,HELSINKI,FINLAND
关键词
spinal anesthesia; bupivacaine; adverse effects;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives. Transient radicular irritation (TRI) has been described to occur following spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lidocaine. The authors recently used only isobaric or hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. All patients who had spinal anesthesia for various kinds of surgery were interviewed after the operation to discover the possibility of TRI following bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Methods. The study included 226 patients. Isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine was given to 116 patients and hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine to 110. The local anesthetic was chosen according to the expected duration of surgery. All patients were interviewed by an anesthesiologist 24 hours after spinal anesthesia, and after 1 week the patients were asked to return a written questionnaire. If pain not associated with operation was noted, the patients were interviewed by phone. Results. One 48-year-old woman reported TRI after spinal anesthesia (saddle block) with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine in the 24-hour interview. Her spinal anesthetic was performed in a sitting position and the anal surgery in a lithotomy position. In the 1-week questionnaire (response rate 92%), none of the other patients fulfilled our criteria for TRI. Conclusions. In spite of one case of TRI, the authors consider bupivacaine to be safe for spinal anesthesia. The association of the sitting and lithotomy positions to the restricted distribution of hyperbaric solution and consequent TRI warrants further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 29
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spinal procaine with and without epinephrine and its relation to transient radicular irritation
    Bergeron, L
    Girard, M
    Drolet, P
    Grenier, Y
    Le Truong, HH
    Boucher, C
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1999, 46 (09): : 846 - 849
  • [32] Spinal procaine with and without epinephrine and its relation to transient radicular irritation
    Lyne Bergeron
    Michel Girard
    Pierre Drolet
    Yvan Grenier
    Hong Hanh Le Truong
    Carl Boucher
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 1999, 46 : 846 - 849
  • [33] Transient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia induced with hyperbaric solutions of cerebrospinal fluid-diluted lidocaine 50 mg/ml or mepivacaine 40 mg/ml or bupivacaine 5 mg/ml
    Salmela, L
    Aromaa, U
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 42 (07) : 765 - 769
  • [34] Incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with prilocaine, lidocaine and bupivacaine
    Hampl, KF
    Wiedmer, S
    Harms, C
    Schneider, MC
    Drasner, K
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) : A778 - A778
  • [35] Transient radicular irritation: A misnomer? Response
    Hampl, KF
    Schneider, MC
    Drasner, K
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (06): : 1392 - 1393
  • [36] Radicular irritation with 2% lignocaine spinal
    Grange, C
    Bright, S
    Douglas, J
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1997, 25 (01) : 89 - 90
  • [37] Spinal Myoclonus after Subarachnoid Anesthesia with Bupivacaine
    Abrao, Joao
    Bianco, Marcelo de Paula
    Roma, Waltuires
    de Souza Krippa, Jose Eduardo
    Hallak, Jaime Eduardo
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2011, 61 (05): : 619 - 623
  • [38] Transient Neurologic Symptoms Following Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine
    Yue Hu
    Yong Ye
    Xue Gong
    Fei-fei Ran
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 2019, 1 (9) : 692 - 697
  • [39] Transient radicular irritation with intrathecal plain lignocaine
    Henderson, DJ
    Faccenda, KA
    Morrison, LMM
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 42 (03) : 376 - 378
  • [40] Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia - A lower incidence with prilocaine and bupivacaine than with lidocaine
    Hampl, KF
    Heinzmann-Wiedmer, S
    Luginbuehl, I
    Harms, C
    Seeberger, M
    Schneider, MC
    Drasner, K
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (03) : 629 - 633