Transient radicular irritation after bupivacaine spinal anesthesia

被引:0
|
作者
Tarkkila, P [1 ]
Huhtala, J [1 ]
Tuominen, M [1 ]
Lindgren, L [1 ]
机构
[1] HELSINKI UNIV,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,DEPT SURG 4,HELSINKI,FINLAND
关键词
spinal anesthesia; bupivacaine; adverse effects;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives. Transient radicular irritation (TRI) has been described to occur following spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lidocaine. The authors recently used only isobaric or hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. All patients who had spinal anesthesia for various kinds of surgery were interviewed after the operation to discover the possibility of TRI following bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Methods. The study included 226 patients. Isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine was given to 116 patients and hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine to 110. The local anesthetic was chosen according to the expected duration of surgery. All patients were interviewed by an anesthesiologist 24 hours after spinal anesthesia, and after 1 week the patients were asked to return a written questionnaire. If pain not associated with operation was noted, the patients were interviewed by phone. Results. One 48-year-old woman reported TRI after spinal anesthesia (saddle block) with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine in the 24-hour interview. Her spinal anesthetic was performed in a sitting position and the anal surgery in a lithotomy position. In the 1-week questionnaire (response rate 92%), none of the other patients fulfilled our criteria for TRI. Conclusions. In spite of one case of TRI, the authors consider bupivacaine to be safe for spinal anesthesia. The association of the sitting and lithotomy positions to the restricted distribution of hyperbaric solution and consequent TRI warrants further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 29
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transient radicular irritation: A comparison of 5% lidocaine vs 0.75% bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia
    Philip, J
    Sharma, SK
    Perez, B
    Slaymaker, E
    Wiley, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (3A) : U880 - U880
  • [2] Transient radicular irritation: a comparison of 5% lidocaine vs 0.75% bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia
    Philip, J
    Sharma, SK
    Perez, B
    Slaymaker, E
    Wiley, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998,
  • [3] Radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia
    Lambert, DH
    Lambert, LA
    Strichartz, GR
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (05) : 1216 - 1217
  • [4] Transient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 4% mepivacaine
    Lynch, J
    zurNieden, M
    Kasper, SM
    Radbruch, L
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (04): : 872 - 873
  • [5] The incidence of transient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia in obstetric patients
    Wong, CA
    Slavenas, P
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1999, 24 (01) : 55 - 58
  • [6] Transient radicular irritation after hyperbaric lidocaine spinal anesthesia in parturients
    Newman, LM
    Iyer, NR
    Tuman, KJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 1997, 6 (02) : 132 - 134
  • [7] Radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia - Reply
    Pollock, JE
    Neal, JM
    Stephenson, C
    Wiley, CE
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (05) : 1217 - 1217
  • [8] TRANSIENT RADICULAR IRRITATION FOLLOWING SPINAL ANESTHETICS - LIDOCAINE VS BUPIVACAINE
    PITTONI, G
    TOFFOLETTO, F
    CALCARELLA, G
    DAVIA, G
    GIRON, GP
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (3A) : A34 - A34
  • [9] Transient radicular irritation after spinal anaesthesia with xylocain
    Hampl, K
    Schneider, M
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 43 (03) : 359 - 360
  • [10] Procaine spinal anesthesia: A pilot study of the incidence of transient radicular irritation
    Axelrod, EH
    Alexander, GD
    Brown, M
    Schork, MA
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (2S):