Identifying optimal biomarker combinations for treatment selection through randomized controlled trials

被引:6
|
作者
Huang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Biomarker; Ramp loss; total burden; treatment selection; variable selection; PATIENT TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS; INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES; COMBINING BIOMARKERS; BREAST-CANCER; HIV-1; VACCINE; PERFORMANCE; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/1740774515580126
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background/Aims Biomarkers associated with treatment-effect heterogeneity can be used to make treatment recommendations that optimize individual clinical outcomes. To accomplish this, statistical methods are needed to generate marker-based treatment-selection rules that can most effectively reduce the population burden due to disease and treatment. Compared to the standard approach of risk modeling to derive treatment-selection rules, a more robust approach is to directly minimize an unbiased estimate of total disease and treatment burden among a pre-specified class of rules. This problem is one of minimizing a weighted sum of 0-1 loss function, which is computationally challenging to solve due to the nonsmoothness of 0-1 loss. Huang and Fong, among others, proposed a method that uses the Ramp loss to approximate the 0-1 loss and solves the minimization problem through repetitive constrained optimizations. The algorithm was shown to have comparable or better performance than other comparative estimators in various settings. Our aim in this article is to further extend the algorithm to allow for variable selection in the presence of a large number of candidate markers. Methods We develop an alternative method to derive marker combinations to minimize the weighted sum of Ramp loss in Huang and Fong, based on data from randomized trials. The new algorithm estimates treatment-selection rules by repetitively minimizing a smooth and differentiable objective function. Through the use of an L1 penalty, we expand the method to allow for feature selection and develop an algorithm based on the coordinate descent method to build the treatment-selection rule. Results Through extensive simulation studies, we compared performance of the proposed estimator to four existing approaches: (1) a logistic regression risk modeling approach, and three other direct optimizing approaches including (2) the estimator in Huang and Fong, (3) the weighted support vector machine, and (4) the weighted logistic regression. The proposed estimator performs comparably to that of Huang and Fong, and comparably or better than other estimators. Allowing for variable selection using the proposed estimator in the presence of a large number of markers further improves treatment-selection performance. The proposed estimator is also advantageous for selecting variables relevant to treatment selection compared to L1 penalized logistic regression and weighted logistic regression. We illustrate the application of the proposed methods in host-genetics data from an HIV vaccine trial. Conclusion The proposed estimator is appealing considering its effectiveness and conceptual simplicity. It has significant potential to contribute to the selection and combination of biomarkers for treatment selection in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 356
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying Optimal Biomarker Combinations for Treatment Selection via a Robust Kernel Method
    Huang, Ying
    Fong, Youyi
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2014, 70 (04) : 891 - 901
  • [2] Randomized controlled trials of biomarker targets
    Erlendsdottir, Margret
    Crawford, Forrest W.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2023, 20 (01) : 47 - 58
  • [3] Instrument selection for randomized controlled trials: Why this and not that?
    Records, Kathie
    Keller, Colleen
    Ainsworth, Barbara
    Permana, Paska
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2012, 33 (01) : 143 - 150
  • [4] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF TREATMENT ARE NEEDED
    UNDERWOOD, M
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7004): : 569 - 569
  • [5] Randomized Controlled Trials for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa
    van Rappard, Dominique C.
    Mekkes, Jan R.
    Tzellos, Thrasivoulos
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC CLINICS, 2016, 34 (01) : 69 - +
  • [6] Selection Bias Results in Misinterpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials on Arthroscopic Treatment of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
    Ilahi, Omer A.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2010, 26 (02): : 144 - 146
  • [7] Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Interventional Methods and Optimal Medical Treatment in the Treatment of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
    Reiff, Tilman
    Boeckler, Dittmar
    Boehm, Michael
    Brueckmann, Hartmut
    Debus, Eike Sebastian
    Eckstein, Hans-Henning
    Fiehler, Jens
    Fraedrich, Gustav
    Hennerici, Michael
    Jansen, Olav
    Lang, Werner
    Mansmann, Ulrich
    Mathias, Klaus
    Mudra, Harald
    Ringelstein, E. Bernd
    Ringleb, Peter Arthur
    Schmidli, Juerg
    Stingele, Robert
    Zahn, Ralf
    Hacke, Werner
    [J]. STROKE, 2010, 41 (12) : E605 - E606
  • [8] Randomized controlled trials to assess optimal aspirin dose are warranted
    Horgan, Rebecca
    Abuhamad, Alfred
    Saade, George
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 229 (05) : 575 - 575
  • [9] Selection of the optimal dose of sertraline for depression: A dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Luo, Xufei
    Zhu, Di
    Li, Jitao
    Ren, Mengjuan
    Liu, Yunlan
    Si, Tianmei
    Chen, Yaolong
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2023, 327
  • [10] Optimal predictive probability designs for randomized biomarker-guided oncology trials
    Zabor, Emily C.
    Kaizer, Alexander M.
    Pennell, Nathan A.
    Hobbs, Brian P.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12