Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients

被引:11
|
作者
Madden, Nigel [1 ,2 ]
Frey, Melissa K. [1 ,3 ]
Joo, LiJin [1 ,4 ]
Lee, Jessica [1 ]
Musselman, Kelsey [1 ,3 ]
Chern, Jing Yi [1 ,5 ]
Blank, Stephanie V. [1 ,6 ]
Pothuri, Bhavana [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Yale Univ, Med Ctr, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
early hospital discharge; elderly; robotic-assisted surgery; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; METAANALYSIS; MULTICENTER; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: A minimally invasive surgical approach has proven to decrease peri-and postoperative complications and shorten duration of hospital stay; however, there are limited data evaluating the safety of robotic-assisted surgery and early hospital discharge in the elderly population. Because age is a well-known, independent risk factor for perioperative morbidity and gynecologists treat many elderly patients, this is an important area of study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate discharge timing and surgical outcomes in elderly compared with younger patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery at a high-volume, single institution from January 2013 through May 2016. Demographic information, discharge timing, and peri-and postoperative outcomes were compared for patients <65 years with those >= 65 years using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There were 2757 patients included, with 2521 <65 years and 236 >= 65 years. Median age of the younger group was 42 years, while the median age of the elderly group was 69 years. Elderly patients had a higher body mass index (kilograms per square meter) (28 vs 26, P <. 001) and higher American Society of Anesthesia classification (P < .001). Elderly were more likely to have malignancy as the indication for surgery (68% vs 11%, P<.001) and to undergo hysterectomy (81% vs 38%, P<.001) or surgery with lymph node dissection (44.5% vs 7.1%, P < .001). Elderly patients had a higher incidence of intraoperative complications (9% vs 4.6%, P = .002) and longer median hospital stay (17 vs 7 hours, P <.001) compared with younger patients. Same-day discharge was more common in younger patients (76% vs 45%, P < .001), and elderly patients were more likely to have admissions lasting >23 hours (13% vs 3%, P < .001) on univariate and multivariate analysis. Analysis of postoperative outcomes included 2023 patients with available postoperative data (80% of total population) (1794 < 65 years, 229 >= 65 years). There were no differences between elderly and younger patients in overall postoperative complications, reoperations, intensive care unit admissions, emergency room visits, or hospital readmission within 6 weeks of surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite having more preoperative risk factors and more surgically complex procedures, elderly patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery had similar postoperative complication rates, and almost half of elderly patients were safely discharged the day of surgery. Our data suggest that robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge are safe in elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:253.e1 / 253.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Indication for robotic-assisted surgery influences perioperative outcomes and hospital readmissions among women undergoing gynecologic procedures
    Musselman, K.
    Frey, M. K.
    Sapra, K. J.
    Madden, N.
    Lee, J.
    Chern, J. Y.
    Blank, S. V.
    Pothuri, B.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 : 145 - 146
  • [33] Intraoperative Fluorescent Ureter Visualization in Complex Laparoscopic or Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Kim, Jiyoun
    Jang, Yoon
    Choi, Su Hyeon
    Jung, Yong Wook
    Kim, Mi-La
    Yun, Bo Seong
    Seong, Seok Ju
    Jun, Hye Sun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [34] Evaluation of Positioning Devices for Optimization of Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Das, Deepanjana
    Propst, Katie
    Wechter, Mary Ellen
    Kho, Rosanne M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 244 - +
  • [35] Workload Interventions May Improve Safety in Robotic-Assisted Surgery
    不详
    [J]. AORN JOURNAL, 2023, 118 (03) : P3 - P3
  • [36] Robotic-Assisted Liver Surgery
    Croner, R.
    Perrakis, A.
    Gruetzmann, R.
    Hohenberger, W.
    Brunner, M.
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2016, 141 (02): : 154 - 159
  • [37] Robotic-Assisted Lymphatic Surgery
    Gruenherz, Lisanne
    von Reibnitz, Donata
    Lindenblat, Nicole
    [J]. HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2024, 56 (02) : 122 - 127
  • [38] Robotic-assisted surgery in ophthalmology
    de Smet, Marc D.
    Naus, Gerrit J. L.
    Faridpooya, Koorosh
    Mura, Marco
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 29 (03) : 248 - 253
  • [39] Robotic-Assisted Esophageal Surgery
    Straughan, David M.
    Azoury, Said C.
    Bennett, Robert D.
    Pimiento, Jose M.
    Fontaine, Jacques P.
    Toloza, Eric M.
    [J]. CANCER CONTROL, 2015, 22 (03) : 335 - 339
  • [40] Robotic-Assisted Oesophageal Surgery
    Egberts, J. -H.
    Aselmann, H.
    Hauser, C.
    Bernsmeier, A.
    Carstens, A.
    Hoecker, J.
    Becker, T.
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2016, 141 (02): : 145 - 153