Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients

被引:11
|
作者
Madden, Nigel [1 ,2 ]
Frey, Melissa K. [1 ,3 ]
Joo, LiJin [1 ,4 ]
Lee, Jessica [1 ]
Musselman, Kelsey [1 ,3 ]
Chern, Jing Yi [1 ,5 ]
Blank, Stephanie V. [1 ,6 ]
Pothuri, Bhavana [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Yale Univ, Med Ctr, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
early hospital discharge; elderly; robotic-assisted surgery; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; RISK-FACTORS; METAANALYSIS; MULTICENTER; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: A minimally invasive surgical approach has proven to decrease peri-and postoperative complications and shorten duration of hospital stay; however, there are limited data evaluating the safety of robotic-assisted surgery and early hospital discharge in the elderly population. Because age is a well-known, independent risk factor for perioperative morbidity and gynecologists treat many elderly patients, this is an important area of study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate discharge timing and surgical outcomes in elderly compared with younger patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery at a high-volume, single institution from January 2013 through May 2016. Demographic information, discharge timing, and peri-and postoperative outcomes were compared for patients <65 years with those >= 65 years using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There were 2757 patients included, with 2521 <65 years and 236 >= 65 years. Median age of the younger group was 42 years, while the median age of the elderly group was 69 years. Elderly patients had a higher body mass index (kilograms per square meter) (28 vs 26, P <. 001) and higher American Society of Anesthesia classification (P < .001). Elderly were more likely to have malignancy as the indication for surgery (68% vs 11%, P<.001) and to undergo hysterectomy (81% vs 38%, P<.001) or surgery with lymph node dissection (44.5% vs 7.1%, P < .001). Elderly patients had a higher incidence of intraoperative complications (9% vs 4.6%, P = .002) and longer median hospital stay (17 vs 7 hours, P <.001) compared with younger patients. Same-day discharge was more common in younger patients (76% vs 45%, P < .001), and elderly patients were more likely to have admissions lasting >23 hours (13% vs 3%, P < .001) on univariate and multivariate analysis. Analysis of postoperative outcomes included 2023 patients with available postoperative data (80% of total population) (1794 < 65 years, 229 >= 65 years). There were no differences between elderly and younger patients in overall postoperative complications, reoperations, intensive care unit admissions, emergency room visits, or hospital readmission within 6 weeks of surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite having more preoperative risk factors and more surgically complex procedures, elderly patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery had similar postoperative complication rates, and almost half of elderly patients were safely discharged the day of surgery. Our data suggest that robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge are safe in elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:253.e1 / 253.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery and early hospital discharge in elderly patients
    Madden, N.
    Frey, M. K.
    Lee, J.
    Musselman, K.
    Chern, J. Y.
    Joo, L.
    Blank, S. V.
    Pothuri, B.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 : 178 - 178
  • [2] Robotic-assisted Gynecologic Surgery in an Elderly Population: A Comparison Study
    Vo, E. H.
    Moreno, A. E.
    Bhattarai, B.
    Patel, S.
    Farley, J. H.
    Monk, B. J.
    Willmott, L. J.
    Chase, D. M.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 147 (01) : 204 - 205
  • [3] Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women
    Krause, Adrian K.
    Muntz, Howard G.
    McGonigle, Kathryn F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (06) : 949 - 953
  • [4] Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology
    Alkatout, I.
    Maass, N.
    [J]. GYNAKOLOGE, 2016, 49 (12): : 906 - +
  • [5] Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology
    Sinno, Abdulrahman K.
    Fader, Amanda N.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (04) : 922 - 932
  • [6] IS ROBOTIC-ASSISTED SURGERY SAFE IN THE ELDERLY POPULATION? AN ANALYSIS OF GYNECOLOGIC PROCEDURES
    Aloisi, A.
    Tseng, J.
    Sandadi, S.
    Callery, R.
    Feinberg, J.
    Kuhn, T.
    Gardner, G.
    Sonoda, Y.
    Jewell, E.
    Zivanovic, O.
    Abu-Rustum, N.
    Leitao, M., Jr.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 : 970 - 970
  • [7] Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery
    Varghese, Aaron
    Doglioli, Marisol
    Fader, Amanda N.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 62 (04): : 733 - 748
  • [8] Anesthetic Considerations in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Vadivelu, Nalini
    Ahuja, Nitin
    Mitra, Sukanya
    Silasi, Dan
    Urman, Richard D.
    [J]. OCHSNER JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (04): : 517 - 524
  • [9] MAUDE: Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Manoucheri, Elmira
    Fuchs-Weizman, Noga
    Cohen, Sarah L.
    Wang, Karen C.
    Einarsson, Jon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 592 - 595
  • [10] Residency Training in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Galloway, Michael L.
    Dhanraj, David N.
    Ventolini, Gary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2012, 28 (03) : 192 - 196