A real time dose monitoring and dose reconstruction tool for patient specific VMAT QA and delivery

被引:33
|
作者
Tyagi, Neelam [1 ]
Yang, Kai [1 ]
Gersten, David [1 ]
Yan, Di [1 ]
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
关键词
linac data monitor; VMAT; integral error; leaf position errors; gantry errors; VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; THERAPY; SYSTEM; IMRT;
D O I
10.1118/1.4764482
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop a real time dose monitoring and dose reconstruction tool to identify and quantify sources of errors during patient specific volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery and quality assurance. Methods: The authors develop a VMAT delivery monitor tool called linac data monitor that connects to the linac in clinical mode and records, displays, and compares real time machine parameters with the planned parameters. A new measure, called integral error, keeps a running total of leaf overshoot and undershoot errors in each leaf pair, multiplied by leaf width, and the amount of time during which the error exists in monitor unit delivery. Another tool reconstructs Pinnacle(3)(TM) format delivered plan based on the saved machine logfile and recalculates actual delivered dose in patient anatomy. Delivery characteristics of various standard fractionation and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) VMAT plans delivered on Elekta Axesse and Synergy linacs were quantified. Results: The MLC and gantry errors for all the treatment sites were 0.00 +/- 0.59 mm and 0.05 +/- 0.31 degrees, indicating a good MLC gain calibration. Standard fractionation plans had a larger gantry error than SBRT plans due to frequent dose rate changes. On average, the MLC errors were negligible but larger errors of up to 6 mm and 2.5 degrees were seen when dose rate varied frequently. Large gantry errors occurred during the acceleration and deceleration process, and correlated well with MLC errors (r = 0.858, p = 0.0004). PTV mean, minimum, and maximum dose discrepancies were 0.87 +/- 0.21%, 0.99 +/- 0.59%, and 1.18 +/- 0.52%, respectively. The organs at risk (OAR) doses were within 2.5%, except some OARs that showed up to 5.6% discrepancy in maximum dose. Real time displayed normalized total positive integral error (normalized to the total monitor units) correlated linearly with MLC (r = 0.9279, p < 0.001) and gantry errors (r = 0.742, p = 0.005). There is a strong correlation between total integral error and PTV mean (r = 0.683, p = 0.015), minimum (r = 0.6147, p = 0.033), and maximum dose (r = 0.6038, p = 0.0376). Conclusions: Errors may exist during complex VMAT planning and delivery. Linac data monitor is capable of detecting and quantifying mechanical and dosimetric errors at various stages of planning and delivery. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4764482]
引用
收藏
页码:7194 / 7204
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] QA of a Multi-Target Multi-Dose VMAT SRS
    Roa, D.
    Gonzales, A.
    Kuo, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3594 - 3594
  • [32] Comparing Measurement Derived (3DVH) and Machine Log File Derived Dose Reconstruction Methods for VMAT QA in Heterogeneous Patient Geometries
    Tyagi, N.
    Yang, K.
    Yan, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [33] The Impact of Modeling the Treatment Couch On Patient Specific VMAT QA
    Gelover, E.
    Dalhart, A.
    Hyer, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3531 - 3531
  • [34] VMAT lung SBRT: 3D evaluation in pretreatment patient QA and in vivo dose verification
    Villaggi, E.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S744 - S744
  • [35] MLC Consistency and Patient Specific VMAT QA with Log Files
    McDermott, R.
    Godley, A.
    Balik, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2938 - 2938
  • [36] Sensitivity of Enhanced Gamma Index to Patient Specific VMAT QA
    Sethi, A.
    Cozzi, J.
    Lavvafi, H.
    Ingram, J.
    Patel, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E432 - E432
  • [37] On Mitigating the Effects of Imaging Dose During Patient Specific QA On a Moving ArcCheck Phantom Using the Accuray Radixact Real Time Tracking System
    Forbang, R.
    Lewis, B.
    Ndlovu, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E893 - E893
  • [38] Dose-Painting VMAT and Patient Dose QA: Showcase of Whole Brain Radiotherapy with Hippocampal-Sparing and Simultaneous Boost to Brain Metastases
    Chan, M.
    Zhang, P.
    Yang, J.
    Xiong, J.
    Li, J.
    Burman, C.
    Parhar, P.
    Schupak, K.
    Mageras, G.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3997 - 3997
  • [39] The effect of dose gradients on gamma comparison insensitivity in patient specific QA comparisons
    Steers, Jennifer M.
    Fraass, Benedick A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (06) : 3671 - 3686
  • [40] 3D dose reconstruction on CBCT for daily monitoring of delivered patient dose
    Eilertsen, K.
    Vidaurre, F. C.
    Pylypchenko, Y.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S778 - S779