The role of optimality in characterizing CO2 seepage from geologic carbon sequestration sites

被引:42
|
作者
Cortis, Andrea [1 ]
Oldenburg, Curtis M. [1 ]
Benson, Sally M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Earth Sci Div 90 1116, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Geologic storage; Monitoring networks; Optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Storage of large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) in deep geologic formations for greenhouse-gas mitigation is gaining momentum and moving from its conceptual and testing stages towards widespread application. In this work we explore various optimization strategies for characterizing surface leakage (seepage) using near-surface measurement approaches such as accumulation chambers and eddy covariance towers. Seepage characterization objectives and limitations need to be defined carefully from the outset especially in light of large natural background variations that can mask seepage. The cost and sensitivity of seepage detection are related to four critical length scales pertaining to the size of the: (1) region that needs to be monitored; (2) footprint of the measurement approach, and (3) main seepage zone; (4) region in which concentrations or fluxes are influenced by seepage. Seepage characterization objectives may include one or all of the tasks of detecting, locating, and quantifying seepage. Each of these tasks has its own optimal strategy. Detecting and locating seepage in a region in which there is no expected or preferred location for seepage nor existing evidence for seepage requires monitoring on a fixed grid, e.g., using eddy covariance towers. The fixed-grid approaches needed to detect seepage are expected to require large numbers of eddy covariance towers for large-scale geologic CO2 storage. Once seepage has been detected and roughly located, seepage zones and features can be optimally pinpointed through a dynamic search strategy, e.g., employing accumulation chambers and/or soil-gas monitoring. Quantification of seepage rates can be done through measurements on a localized fixed grid once the seepage is pinpointed. Background measurements are essential for seepage detection in natural ecosystems. Artificial neural networks are considered as regression models useful for distinguishing natural system behavior from anomalous behavior suggestive of CO2 seepage without need for detailed understanding of natural system processes. Because of the local extrema in CO2 fluxes and concentrations in natural systems, simple steepest-descent algorithms are not effective and evolutionary computation algorithms are proposed as a paradigm for dynamic monitoring networks to pinpoint CO2 seepage areas. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 652
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bayesian hierarchical models for soil CO2 flux and leak detection at geologic sequestration sites
    Yang, Ya-Mei
    Small, Mitchell J.
    Junker, Brian
    Bromhal, Grant S.
    Strazisar, Brian
    Wells, Arthur
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2011, 64 (03) : 787 - 798
  • [22] Reactive transport modeling of geologic CO2 sequestration at Sleipner
    Johnson, JW
    Nitao, JJ
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 327 - 332
  • [23] Carbonation of Cement in CO2 Flooding and Geologic Sequestration Well
    Bu Yu-huan
    Liu Hua-jie
    Guo Xin-yang
    [J]. 2010 THE SECOND CHINA ENERGY SCIENTIST FORUM, VOL 1-3, 2010, : 400 - 405
  • [24] Implications of Compensating Property Owners for Geologic Sequestration of CO2
    Gresham, R. Lee
    McCoy, Sean T.
    Apt, Jay
    Morgan, M. Granger
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (08) : 2897 - 2903
  • [25] Building Statistical Proxy Models for CO2 Geologic Sequestration
    Schuetter, Jared
    Mishra, Srikanta
    Ganesh, Priya Ravi
    Mooney, Doug
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 3702 - 3714
  • [26] Geothermal energy production at geologic CO2 sequestration sites: Impact of thermal drawdown on reservoir pressure
    Randolph, Jimmy B.
    Saar, Martin O.
    Bielicki, Jeffrey
    [J]. GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 6625 - 6635
  • [27] Sedimentary reservoir oxidation during geologic CO2 sequestration
    Lammers, Laura N.
    Brown, Gordon E., Jr.
    Bird, Dennis K.
    Thomas, Randal B.
    Johnson, Natalie C.
    Rosenbauer, Robert J.
    Maher, Katharine
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2015, 155 : 30 - 46
  • [28] Special issue on computational methods in geologic CO2 sequestration
    Juanes, Ruben
    Class, Holger
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2013, 62 : 353 - 355
  • [29] GPU simulations for risk assessment in CO2 geologic sequestration
    Zhang, Yan
    Vouzis, Panagiotis
    Sahinidis, Nikolaos V.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 35 (08) : 1631 - 1644
  • [30] Geologic CO2 sequestration may benefit upstream industry
    Stevens, SH
    Gale, J
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2000, 98 (20) : 40 - 44