Challenges and opportunities in the removal of sulphate ions in contaminated mine water: A review

被引:162
|
作者
Fernando, W. Ashane M. [1 ]
Ilankoon, I. M. S. K. [1 ]
Syed, Tauqir H. [1 ]
Yellishetty, Mohan [2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Engn, Discipline Chem Engn, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 23 Coll Walk, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Acid mine drainage; Mine water; Sulphate ions; Sustainability; Water contamination; Water treatment; ACTIVATED CARBON PREPARATION; PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER; HEAVY-METAL REMOVAL; WASTE-WATER; REDUCING BACTERIA; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; FLY-ASH; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; MICROBIAL PROCESSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.mineng.2017.12.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Metal sulphates are one of the major contributors to acid mine drainage (AMD) or acid rock drainage (ARD). AMD occurs by the oxidation of metal sulphides. Sulphides produce sulphates and eventually acidify the medium by converting to sulphuric acid. As AMD contaminates the water sources downstream, the set limit of sulphates for human consumption gets compromised. Stringent standards are imposed on, to comply with limitations set by the regulatory bodies. World Health Organization (WHO) emphasises on a 250 mg/L sulphate concentration in water for human consumption. Therefore, curing AMD of sulphates has become one of the prominent issues in water research. Unregulated disposal of such drainage may cause the increase in salinity and increase in the pH, which can be detrimental to the utility of the water downstream. Corrosion, scaling and health implications are definite results of AMD. Numerous approaches are available to treat sulphates from AMD. Suitability of a specific method depends on the level of removal expected, environmental legislations, available resources, space required, economy and volume of the contaminated water. Several approaches which have demonstrated promising results in the laboratory scale, but their viability at the industrial scale is yet to be established. This paper reviews the remediation methods which are currently in practice. It discusses the approaches in two main topics, both conventional and recent developments. While the conventional methods include lime, limestone and wetlands, the recent developments include filtration, electrocoagulation, adsorption, ion exchange and precipitation with the introduction of a certain level of novelty throughout the last few years. It is well established that lime and limestone treatment of AMD are well suited for pre-treatment processes whereas the rest of the methods can be selected upon the site specific requirements. Even though the novel methods show their potential to reduce sulphate ions greatly, these need to be tested at industrial scale in order to identify the overall effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 90
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sulphate removal from mine water by precipitation as ettringite by newly developed electrochemical aluminium dosing method
    Nurmesniemi, Emma-Tuulia
    Hu, Tao
    Rajaniemi, Kyosti
    Lassi, Ulla
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2021, 217 : 195 - 202
  • [42] MXenes and MXene-based Materials for the Removal of Water Pollutants: Challenges and Opportunities
    Khatami, Mehrdad
    Iravani, Siavash
    COMMENTS ON INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2021, 41 (04) : 213 - 248
  • [43] Synthesis and characterization of fly ash activated zeolites (FAZ) for the removal of sulphate ions from acid mine drainage (AMD)
    Thacker, B., V
    Vadodaria, G. P.
    Priyadarshi, G., V
    Trivedi, M. H.
    SADHANA-ACADEMY PROCEEDINGS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2024, 49 (04):
  • [44] Remediation Opportunities for Arsenic-Contaminated Gold Mine Waste
    Besedin, Julie A.
    Khudur, Leadin S.
    Netherway, Pacian
    Ball, Andrew S.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (18):
  • [45] Review of recently used adsorbents for antimony removal from contaminated water
    Cheng, Mengsi
    Fang, Ying
    Li, Haipu
    Yang, Zhaoguang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (18) : 26021 - 26044
  • [46] Arsenic Removal from Contaminated Water Using Natural Adsorbents: A Review
    Yeo, Kanfolo Franck Herve
    Li, Chaokun
    Zhang, Hui
    Chen, Jin
    Wang, Wendong
    Dong, Yingying
    COATINGS, 2021, 11 (11)
  • [47] Review of recently used adsorbents for antimony removal from contaminated water
    Mengsi Cheng
    Ying Fang
    Haipu Li
    Zhaoguang Yang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 26021 - 26044
  • [48] Arsenite oxidation and adsorptive arsenic removal from contaminated water: a review
    Jain N.
    Singh P.
    Bhatnagar A.
    Maiti A.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (30) : 42574 - 42592
  • [49] Removal of copper ions from a waste mine water by a liquid emulsion membrane method
    Valenzuela, F
    Fonseca, C
    Basualto, C
    Correa, O
    Tapia, C
    Sapag, J
    MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2005, 18 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [50] Microporous ceramic membrane technology for the removal of arsenic and chromium ions from contaminated water
    Pagana, A. E.
    Sklari, S. D.
    Kikkinides, E. S.
    Zaspalis, V. T.
    MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS, 2008, 110 (01) : 150 - 156