A Prospective Patient-centred Evaluation of Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Stricture Using a Validated Patient-reported Outcome Measure

被引:72
|
作者
Jackson, Matthew J. [1 ]
Chaudhury, Ishaan [2 ]
Mangera, Altaf [3 ]
Brett, Andrew [4 ]
Watkin, Nick [4 ]
Chapple, Christopher R. [3 ]
Andrich, Daniela E. [2 ]
Pickard, Robert S. [5 ]
Mundy, Anthony R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Freeman Rd Hosp, Dept Urol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Inst Urol, London, England
[3] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Dept Urol, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[4] St George Hosp, Dept Urol, London, England
[5] Newcastle Univ, Inst Cellular Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Outcome assessment (health care); Patient-reported outcome measure; Quality of life; Urethral stricture; Urethral surgery; Urethroplasty; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Studies of interventions for urethral stricture have inferred patient benefit from clinician-driven outcomes or questionnaires lacking scientifically robust evidence of their measurement properties for men with this disease. Objective: To evaluate urethral reconstruction from the patients' perspective using a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Design, setting, and participants: Forty-six men with anterior urethral stricture at four UK urology centres completed the PROM before (baseline) and 2 yr after urethroplasty. Intervention: A psychometrically robust PROM for men with urethral stricture disease. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), health status, and treatment satisfaction were measured, and paired t and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were used for comparative analysis. Results and limitations: Thirty-eight men underwent urethroplasty for bulbar stricture and eight for penile stricture. The median (range) follow-up was 25 (20-30) mo. Total LUTS scores (0 = least symptomatic, 24 = most symptomatic) improved from a median of 12 at baseline to 4 at 2 yr (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] of differences 6.6 [4.2-9.1], p < 0.0001). A total of 33 men (72%) felt their urinary symptoms interfered less with their overall quality of life, 8 (17%) reported no change, and 5 (11%) were worse 2 yr after urethroplasty. Overall, 40 men (87%) remained "satisfied'' or "very satisfied'' with the outcome of their operation. Health status visual analogue scale scores (100 = best imaginable health, 0 = worst) 2 yr after urethroplasty improved from a mean of 69 at baseline to 79 (mean [95% CI] of differences 10 [2-18], p = 0.018). Health state index scores (1 = full health, 0 = dead) improved from 0.79 at baseline to 0.89 at 2 yr (mean [95% CI] of differences 0.10 [0.02-0.18), p = 0.012]). Conclusions: This is the first study to prospectively evaluate urethral reconstruction using a validated PROM. Men reported continued relief from symptoms with related improvements in overall health status 2 yr after urethroplasty. These data can be used as a provisional reference point against which urethral surgeons can benchmark their performance. (C) 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 782
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient Perception of Prolapse Condition Questionnaire: A Validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
    Gans Thiagamoorthy
    Rayan Mohamed-Ahmed
    Maria Vella
    Linda Cardozo
    Ilias Giarenis
    Martino Zacche
    Richard Flint
    Sushma Srikrishna
    Dudley Robinson
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2025, 36 (1) : 79 - 85
  • [22] Development and psychometric testing of a patient-reported inventory to measure patient-centred care in dietetic practice
    Sladdin, Ishtar
    Chaboyer, Wendy
    Ball, Lauren
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2019, 25 (06) : 547 - 554
  • [23] Achieving patient priorities: an alternative to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for promoting patient-centred care
    Naik, Aanand D.
    Catic, Angela
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2021, 30 (02) : 92 - 95
  • [24] A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Quality of Patient-Centred Cancer Care
    Tzelepis, Flora
    Rose, Shiho
    Sanson-Fisher, Robert
    Clinton-McHarg, Tara
    Carey, Mariko
    Paul, Christine
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 : 285 - 286
  • [25] Critical Analysis of Patient-reported Complaints and Complications After Urethroplasty for Bulbar Urethral Stricture Disease
    Granieri, Michael A.
    Webster, George D.
    Peterson, Andrew C.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (06) : 1489 - 1493
  • [26] DEFINING AND CAPTURING PATIENT-CENTRED CARE IN LONG-TERM CONDITIONS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PATIENT-REPORTED EXPERIENCE MEASURE
    Hadi, M.
    Swinburn, P.
    Gibbons, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A97 - A97
  • [27] PHASE I DEVELOPMENT OF A PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE FOR MALE URETHRAL STRICTURE DISEASE
    Breyer, Benjamin
    Edwards, Todd
    Patrick, Donald
    Voelzke, Bryan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E321 - E321
  • [28] Evaluation of the efficacy of perineal urethrostomy for patients with anterior urethral stricture: insights from surgical and patient-reported outcomes
    Masayuki Shinchi
    Akio Horiguch
    Kenichiro Ojima
    Kazuki Kawamura
    Yusuke Hirano
    Eiji Takahashi
    Fumihiro Kimura
    Ryuichi Azuma
    Keiichi Ito
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 4443 - 4448
  • [29] Evaluation of the efficacy of perineal urethrostomy for patients with anterior urethral stricture: insights from surgical and patient-reported outcomes
    Shinchi, Masayuki
    Horiguch, Akio
    Ojima, Kenichiro
    Kawamura, Kazuki
    Hirano, Yusuke
    Takahashi, Eiji
    Kimura, Fumihiro
    Azuma, Ryuichi
    Ito, Keiichi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (12) : 4443 - 4448
  • [30] Prospective evaluation of patient reported outcome measures post urethroplasty: is there a "Trifecta"?
    Ong, M.
    Desai, D.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 : 84 - 85