Development of highbush blueberry cultivars adapted to Florida

被引:1
|
作者
Lyrene, P
机构
来源
JOURNAL AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY | 2002年 / 56卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The low-chill southern highbush blueberries now being grown in Florida were developed by crossing northern highbush cultivars, which had large fruit, high fruit quality, and early ripening but were poorly adapted in Florida, with Florida native blueberry species, which were well-adapted but were late-ripening and had small fruit. In formulating the foundation populations for recurrent selection during the 1950s, most of the parentage was northern highbush, and less was Florida native. This paper presents the hypothesis that faster progress could have been made if a higher percentage of the original gene pool had been derived from the adapted natives. The hypothesis is based on the observation that good environmental adaptation depends on many independent components, most of which are hard to evaluate accurately in small plots in one year, whereas large fruit, high fruit quality, and early ripening are easier to evaluate in single-plant plots in a single year. Them ability to evaluate young plants in small plots allows rapid cycles of recurrent selection during which the selected characters can quickly be improved. Florida native blueberry species that could have been used more in breeding include diploid Vaccinium darrowi Camp, diploid highbush blueberry (V corymbosum L.) from the Florida peninsula between Ocala and Lake Okeechobee, and tetraploid highbush blueberry (V corymbosum L.) from northeast Florida and southeast Georgia.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:79 / 85
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seasonal Water Use of Southern Highbush Blueberry in Florida
    Williamson, Jeffrey G.
    Mejia, Luis E.
    Ferguson, Bradley
    HORTSCIENCE, 2013, 48 (09) : S426 - S426
  • [22] Comparing Sugar Profiles in Southern Highbush, Rabbiteye, and Northern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars
    Mohammed, Jamal
    Amaral, Kathleen S.
    Holland, Renee M.
    Chavez, Dario J.
    Itle, Rachel A.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (09) : SR63 - SR63
  • [23] Susceptibility of Highbush Blueberry Cultivars to Phytophthora Root Rot
    Yeo, John R.
    Weiland, Jerry E.
    Sullivan, Dan M.
    Bryla, David R.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2016, 51 (01) : 74 - 78
  • [24] Ethylene biosynthesis in ripening and stored highbush blueberry cultivars
    Poole, PR
    Boyd, AJ
    Wahrlich, SM
    Patel, N
    POSTHARVEST '96 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL POSTHARVEST SCIENCE CONFERENCE, 1998, 464 : 505 - 505
  • [25] Response of three southern highbush blueberry cultivars to CPPU
    NeSmith, D. Scott
    HORTSCIENCE, 2008, 43 (03) : 628 - 628
  • [26] SCREENING HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY CULTIVARS FOR RESISTANCE TO PHOMOPSIS CANKER
    BAKER, JB
    HANCOCK, JF
    RAMSDELL, DC
    HORTSCIENCE, 1995, 30 (03) : 586 - 588
  • [27] Tolerance of southern highbush and rabbiteye blueberry cultivars to saflufenacil
    Aldridge, Ryan B.
    Jennings, Katherine M.
    Chaudhari, Sushila
    Monks, David W.
    Everman, Wesley J.
    Mehra, Lucky K.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (03) : 475 - 480
  • [28] Comparison of three new southern highbush blueberry cultivars
    Magee, JB
    Smith, BJ
    Gupton, CI
    Spiers, JM
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON VACCINIUM CULTURE, 1997, (446): : 143 - 147
  • [29] A survey of fruit firmness in highbush blueberry and species-introgressed blueberry cultivars
    Ehlenfeldt, MK
    Martin, RB
    HORTSCIENCE, 2002, 37 (02) : 386 - 389
  • [30] Field Performance of Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars Obtained from Micropropagation and Softwood Cuttings at Two Florida Locations
    Marino, Silvia
    Williamson, Jeffrey
    Olmstead, James W.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2011, 46 (09) : S113 - S114