Propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for upper airway endoscopy in spontaneous breathing patients: the ENDOTANIL Randomized Trial

被引:3
|
作者
Besch, Guillaume [1 ,2 ]
Chopard-Guillemin, Angeline [1 ]
Monnet, Elisabeth [3 ,4 ]
Causeret, Arnaud [1 ]
Jurine, Amelie [1 ]
Baudry, Gerald [1 ]
Lasry, Benjamin [1 ]
Tavernier, Laurent [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Samain, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
Pili-Floury, Sebastien [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Franche Comte, Univ Hosp Besancon, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Besancon, France
[2] INSERM, SFR 133, EA 3920, Besancon, France
[3] Univ Hosp Besancon, Clin Invest Ctr, Besancon, France
[4] Univ Franche Comte, SFR FED 4234, Besancon, France
[5] Univ Hosp Besancon, Dept ENT Surg, Besancon, France
[6] Univ Franche Comte, EA 481, Besancon, France
[7] Univ Franche Comte, SFR FED 4234, Besancon, France
关键词
Anesthesia; General; Intravenous; Endoscopy; Bronchoscopy; Laryngoscopy; Propofol; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; INTUBATING CONDITIONS; PHARMACODYNAMIC INTERACTION; HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; CONTROLLED INFUSION; BISPECTRAL INDEX; CARDIAC-OUTPUT; LARYNGOSCOPY; PHARMACOKINETICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The ENDOTANIL Trial aimed at comparing an association of target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentanil and propofol to TCI of propofol alone on the clinical conditions during pan endoscopy for assessment of the upper airway (pan endoscopy) performed under tubeless general anesthesia. METHODS: This double-blind, single center, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a French tertiary level of care, from June 2009 to February 2013. Patients scheduled for elective pan endoscopy were anesthetized using propofol TCI combined to either remifentanil TCI (effect-site concentration=1.5 ng.mL(-1); remifentanil group) or placebo (control group). The main outcome measure was the percentage of clinically acceptable conditions for pan endoscopy, using a 5-criteria score (ease of laryngoscopy, position and movements of the vocal cords, cough and movements of the limbs to stimulation). The secondary outcomes were hemodynamic and respiratory safety. RESULTS: In this study 218 patients (mean +/- SD age 60 [10] yrs) were included. Clinically acceptable conditions were observed in 68% and 64% of the patients included in Remifentanil and Control group, respectively (P=0.39). None of the 5 parameters of the pan endoscopy score was significantly different between the 2 groups. Hemodynamic alterations were significantly lower in the Remifentanil as compared to the control group. Incidence of hypoxemia or need for rescue mechanical ventilation did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The adjunction of remifentanil to propofol TCI, at a dose that maintain spontaneous breathing, did not improve the conditions for pan endoscopy, but attenuates the hemodynamic response induced by upper airway stimulation.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1138 / 1148
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The neuromuscular effects of rocuronium under sevoflurane-remifentanil or propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized clinical comparative study in an Asian population
    Lee, Sangseok
    Ro, Young Jin
    Koh, Won Uk
    Nishiyama, Tomoki
    Yang, Hong-seuk
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [22] The neuromuscular effects of rocuronium under sevoflurane-remifentanil or propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized clinical comparative study in an Asian population
    Sangseok Lee
    Young Jin Ro
    Won Uk Koh
    Tomoki Nishiyama
    Hong-seuk Yang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 16
  • [23] Opioid-free anesthesia with esketamine-dexmedetomidine versus opioid-based anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Xue, Zhouya
    Yan, Cong
    Liu, Yi
    Yang, Nan
    Zhang, Geqing
    Qian, Weisheng
    Qian, Bin
    Liu, Xiang
    BMC SURGERY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] Propofol-ketamine or propofol-remifentanil for deep sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing burn dressing changes: a randomized clinical trial
    Seol, Tai-Kyung
    Lim, Jin-Kyu
    Yoo, Eun-Kyung
    Min, Seong-Won
    Kim, Chong-Soo
    Hwang, Jin-Young
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2015, 25 (06) : 560 - 566
  • [25] Etomidate-Remifentanil is more Suitable for Monitored Anesthesia Care during Gastroscopy in Older Patients than Propofol-Remifentanil
    Shen, Xiao-Chun
    Ao, Xing
    Cao, Yan
    Lan, Li
    Liu, Xin-Man
    Sun, Wen-Jing
    Li, Ping
    Lan, Chun-Hui
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2015, 21 : 1 - 8
  • [26] Dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Goettel, N.
    Bharadwaj, S.
    Venkatraghavan, L.
    Mehta, J.
    Bernstein, M.
    Manninen, P. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (06) : 811 - 821
  • [27] Evaluation of the aepEX™ TM monitor of hypnotic depth in pediatric patients receiving propofol-remifentanil anesthesia
    Cheung, Yuen M.
    Scoones, Gail P.
    Hoeks, Sanne E.
    Stolker, Robert J.
    Weber, Frank
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2013, 23 (10) : 891 - 897
  • [28] Effect of desflurane-remifentanil vs. Propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized trial
    Cho, Youn Joung
    Kim, Tae Kyong
    Hong, Deok Man
    Seo, Jeong-Hwa
    Bahk, Jae-Hyon
    Jeon, Yunseok
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [29] Effect of desflurane-remifentanil vs. Propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized trial
    Youn Joung Cho
    Tae Kyong Kim
    Deok Man Hong
    Jeong-Hwa Seo
    Jae-Hyon Bahk
    Yunseok Jeon
    BMC Anesthesiology, 17
  • [30] EEG-derived pain threshold index-guided versus standard care during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
    Jiang, Yu
    Ding, Jian-ming
    Hao, Xi-xi
    Fang, Pan-pan
    Liu, Xue-Sheng
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (08)