Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Cuiping [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Wang, Lu [1 ]
Song, Juan [1 ]
Zhou, Chunmei [2 ]
Wang, Xiaohuan [2 ]
Ma, Yan [2 ]
Chen, Cuicui [1 ]
Guo, Wei [2 ]
Song, Yuanlin [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Pulm Med, Shanghai Key Lab Lung Inflammat & Injury, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Inst Infect Dis & Biosecur, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Resp Res Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Aging & Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Fudan Univ, Jinshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR); pathogen detection; rapid diagnostics; molecular diagnostics; pneumonia; COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; STENOTROPHOMONAS-MALTOPHILIA; STREPTOCOCCUS-PNEUMONIAE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.21037/jtd-22-544
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Rapid pathogen identification is critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive, broad-spectrum molecular detection technique that is simple and rapid to perform. It is capable of simultaneously screening for multiple pathogens within a short time range. Here, we designed and evaluated a multiplex PCR kit for the identification of 17 common respiratory pathogens in clinical samples from hospitalized patients. Methods: A total of 452 samples from hospitalized patients, including 242 respiratory and 210 nonrespiratory samples, were analyzed for 13 bacteria and 4 fungi by a multiplex fluorescent PCR kit. The diagnostic performance of the kit was assessed by considering routine microbiology as the reference standard. Results: The overall positivity rate of the multiplex PCR kit was 86.9%, much higher than that noted on routine microbiology (56.9%). Furthermore, the co-infection detection rate was also significantly higher than that noted on routine microbiology (69.5% vs. 15.0%). Compared with routine microbiology, kit sensitivity was >90% for detection of most target bacteria, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of >99%, especially for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. The kit was noted to be particularly superior in identifying Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Streptococcus pneumoniae as compared to routine microbiology. The multiplex PCR kit was noted to be less sensitive (33.3-59.6%) and more specific (93.9100.0%) for detection of mycobacteria and fungi. Conclusions: Our multiplex PCR kit offers a rapid and sensitive diagnosis of common bacterial pneumonia, although sensitivity for mycobacteria and fungi warrants enhancement. Further optimization includes minimizing false positivity and increasing relevance to clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:3386 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of respiratory bacterial pathogens causing atypical pneumonia by multiplex Lightmix® RT-PCR
    Wagne, Karoline
    Springer, Burkard
    Imkamp, Frank
    Opota, Onya
    Greub, Gilbert
    Keller, Peter M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 308 (03) : 317 - 323
  • [32] Simultaneous Detection of 13 Key Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens by Combination of Multiplex PCR and Capillary Electrophoresis
    Jiang Lu Xi
    Ren Hong Yu
    Zhou Hai Jian
    Zhao Si Hong
    Hou Bo Yan
    Yan Jian Ping
    Qin Tian
    Chen Yu
    BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2017, 30 (08) : 549 - 561
  • [33] Epidemiological Characterization of Respiratory Pathogens Using the Multiplex PCR FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel
    Hong, Young Jun
    Jung, Bo Kyeung
    Kim, Jae Kyung
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (07)
  • [34] Multiplex detection of bacterial pathogens by PCR/SERS assay
    Lyu, Nana
    Potluri, Phani Rekha
    Rajendran, Vinoth Kumar
    Wang, Yuling
    Sunna, Anwar
    ANALYST, 2024, 149 (10) : 2898 - 2904
  • [35] Multiplex PCR for the detection of posterior uveitis pathogens.
    Dabil, H
    Boley, ML
    Van Gelder, RN
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S363 - S363
  • [36] Detection to Pathogens of Poplar Cankers by Multiplex PCR Technique
    Feng Xiaohui
    Zhang Xingyao
    Yan Donghui
    Chinese Forestry Science and Technology, 2012, 11 (03) : 85 - 86
  • [37] Association of STD pathogens via multiplex PCR detection
    Vica, Mihaela Laura
    Junie, Lia Monica
    Matei, Horea Vladi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2017, 40 : S9 - S9
  • [38] Rapid detection of periodontal pathogens by multiplex PCR.
    Sato, T
    Matsuyama, J
    Miyasawa, H
    Takahashi, N
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 396 - 396
  • [39] Evaluation of Multiplex PCR with Enhanced Spore Germination for Detection of Clostridium difficile from Stool Samples of the Hospitalized Patients
    Chankhamhaengdecha, Surang
    Hadpanus, Piyapong
    Aroonnual, Amornrat
    Ngamwongsatit, Puriya
    Chotiprasitsakul, Darunee
    Chongtrakool, Piriyaporn
    Janvilisri, Tavan
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013
  • [40] Distribution of respiratory viruses: Evaluation of multiplex PCR results of 3074 patients
    Zeytinli, Ulku Oral
    Durmuslu, Ayca Ozer
    Aslan, Ferhat Gurkan
    Dincer, Solen Daldaban
    Eker, Pinar
    Aksaray, Sebahat
    NORTHERN CLINICS OF ISTANBUL, 2022, 9 (05) : 501 - 504