Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Cuiping [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Wang, Lu [1 ]
Song, Juan [1 ]
Zhou, Chunmei [2 ]
Wang, Xiaohuan [2 ]
Ma, Yan [2 ]
Chen, Cuicui [1 ]
Guo, Wei [2 ]
Song, Yuanlin [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Pulm Med, Shanghai Key Lab Lung Inflammat & Injury, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Inst Infect Dis & Biosecur, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Resp Res Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Aging & Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Fudan Univ, Jinshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR); pathogen detection; rapid diagnostics; molecular diagnostics; pneumonia; COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; STENOTROPHOMONAS-MALTOPHILIA; STREPTOCOCCUS-PNEUMONIAE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.21037/jtd-22-544
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Rapid pathogen identification is critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive, broad-spectrum molecular detection technique that is simple and rapid to perform. It is capable of simultaneously screening for multiple pathogens within a short time range. Here, we designed and evaluated a multiplex PCR kit for the identification of 17 common respiratory pathogens in clinical samples from hospitalized patients. Methods: A total of 452 samples from hospitalized patients, including 242 respiratory and 210 nonrespiratory samples, were analyzed for 13 bacteria and 4 fungi by a multiplex fluorescent PCR kit. The diagnostic performance of the kit was assessed by considering routine microbiology as the reference standard. Results: The overall positivity rate of the multiplex PCR kit was 86.9%, much higher than that noted on routine microbiology (56.9%). Furthermore, the co-infection detection rate was also significantly higher than that noted on routine microbiology (69.5% vs. 15.0%). Compared with routine microbiology, kit sensitivity was >90% for detection of most target bacteria, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of >99%, especially for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. The kit was noted to be particularly superior in identifying Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Streptococcus pneumoniae as compared to routine microbiology. The multiplex PCR kit was noted to be less sensitive (33.3-59.6%) and more specific (93.9100.0%) for detection of mycobacteria and fungi. Conclusions: Our multiplex PCR kit offers a rapid and sensitive diagnosis of common bacterial pneumonia, although sensitivity for mycobacteria and fungi warrants enhancement. Further optimization includes minimizing false positivity and increasing relevance to clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:3386 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Seeplex™ Pneumobacter Multiplex PCR Kit for the Detection of Respiratory Bacterial Pathogens in Pediatric Patients
    Park, Joowon
    Kim, Jae Kyoung
    Rheem, Insoo
    Kim, Jongwan
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 29 (04): : 307 - 313
  • [2] Clinical Evaluation of a Multiplex PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of 18 Respiratory Pathogens in Patients with Acute Respiratory Infections
    Li, Wenmin
    Wang, Xiaoxiao
    Cui, Wenhao
    Yuan, Leyong
    Hu, Xuejiao
    PATHOGENS, 2023, 12 (01):
  • [3] Multiplex PCR and Emerging Technologies for the Detection of Respiratory Pathogens
    Caliendo, Angela M.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 52 : S326 - S330
  • [4] Multiplex PCR and Microarray for Detection of Swine Respiratory Pathogens
    Lung, O.
    Ohene-Adjei, S.
    Buchanan, C.
    Joseph, T.
    King, R.
    Erickson, A.
    Detmer, S.
    Ambagala, A.
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2017, 64 (03) : 834 - 848
  • [5] Evaluation of a multiplex, reverse transcriptase PCR ELISA for the detection of nine respiratory tract pathogens
    Puppe, W
    Weigl, JAI
    Aron, G
    Gröndahl, B
    Schmitt, HJ
    Niesters, HGM
    Groen, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2004, 30 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [6] Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
    Malhotra, Bharti
    Swamy, M. Anjaneya
    Reddy, P. V. Janardhan
    Kumar, Neeraj
    Tiwari, Jitendra Kumar
    VIROLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 13
  • [7] Evaluation of custom multiplex real - time RT - PCR in comparison to fast - track diagnostics respiratory 21 pathogens kit for detection of multiple respiratory viruses
    Bharti Malhotra
    M. Anjaneya Swamy
    P. V. Janardhan Reddy
    Neeraj Kumar
    Jitendra Kumar Tiwari
    Virology Journal, 13
  • [8] Evaluation of a pneumonia multiplex PCR panel for detection of bacterial respiratory tract pathogens from serial specimens collected from hospitalized COVID-19 patients
    Tellapragada, Chaitanya
    Ydsten, Karin Andersson
    Ternhag, Anders
    Giske, Christian G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 41 (07) : 1093 - 1098
  • [9] Evaluation of a pneumonia multiplex PCR panel for detection of bacterial respiratory tract pathogens from serial specimens collected from hospitalized COVID-19 patients
    Chaitanya Tellapragada
    Karin Andersson Ydsten
    Anders Ternhag
    Christian G. Giske
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2022, 41 : 1093 - 1098
  • [10] Development and evaluation of a multiplex digital PCR method for sensitive and accurate detection of respiratory pathogens in children
    Chen, Xiangpeng
    Wang, Fang
    Fu, Yiliang
    Huang, Luci
    Li, Fei
    Zhao, Hongwei
    Guan, Xiaolei
    Li, Qiuping
    Li, Qi
    Wang, Yilu
    Guo, Yong
    Xie, Zhengde
    VIROLOGY, 2024, 590