National Trends and Outcomes of Patients Bridged to Transplant With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

被引:3
|
作者
Fugar, S. [1 ]
Okoh, A. K. [2 ]
Eshun, D. [3 ]
Yirerong, J. [4 ]
Appiah, L. T. [5 ]
Mbachi, C. [1 ]
Legge, T. [6 ]
Camacho, M. [2 ]
Russo, M. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] John H Stroger Hosp Cook Cty, Dept Med, Chicago, IL USA
[2] RWJ Barnabas Hlth, Newark Beth Israel Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Meharry Med Coll, Dept Med, Nashville, TN 37208 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Mem Hosp Rhode Isl, Dept Internal Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[5] Komfo Anokye Teaching Hosp, Dept Med, Kumasi, Ghana
[6] Boston Consulting Grp Inc, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; INTERMACS ANNUAL-REPORT; HEART; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.036
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) are widely used as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) among patients with advanced heart failure. The primary outcome of the current study was to study the incidence of waitlist mortality and morbidity of CF-LVAD patients bridged to heart transplantation in the current BTT era and to determine the factors that increased their risk of delisting. Methods. Patients who were bridged to heart transplant with a CF-LVAD between April 2008 and September 2015 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing heart transplant registry. They were then categorized based on the development of complications. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for time-to-event analysis for the primary outcome. Results. Out of 7070 patients who were bridged to heart transplant, 2510 (36%) developed device-related complications. The primary outcome was present in 1631 of 7070 patients (23%). Independent predictors of primary outcome were age, ABO blood group, etiology of cardiomyopathy, and history of diabetes mellitus. Developing one device-related complication was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.59 of having the primary outcome. The HR increased to 3.45 when >= 2 of the defined complications occurred. In patients who developed the primary outcome, they most likely had a device infection (odds ratio 2.51). Conclusion. Findings from the current study add to the existing literature about the incidence of morbidity and mortality in the current BTT era. Development of one device related complication increases the risk of death or delisting among patients on the heart transplant waitlist; however, this risk almost doubles when 2 or more complications occur.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 858
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients on Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Inotropes at the Time Listing for Heart Transplant
    Akintoye, E.
    Briasoulis, A.
    Duque, E. Ruiz
    Inampudi, C.
    Bhama, J.
    Alvarez, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 38 (04): : S347 - S347
  • [22] Outcomes from a recovery protocol for patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
    Knierim, Jan
    Heck, Roland
    Pieri, Marina
    Schoenrath, Felix
    Soltani, Sajjad
    Stawowy, Philipp
    Dreysse, Stephan
    Stein, Julia
    Mueller, Marcus
    Mulzer, Johanna
    Dandel, Michael
    Falk, Volkmar
    Krabatsch, Thomas
    Potapov, Evgenij
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 38 (04): : 440 - 448
  • [23] Outcomes of heart transplant recipients bridged with percutaneous versus durable left ventricular assist devices
    Xia, Yu
    Kim, Juka S. S.
    Eng, Isabel K. K.
    Nsair, Ali
    Ardehali, Abbas
    Shemin, Richard J. J.
    Kwon, Murray H. H.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 37 (04)
  • [24] Emergency Care for Patients with Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Shah, K. B.
    Cei, L. F.
    Pinney, S. P.
    Peberdy, M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04): : S220 - S221
  • [25] Cerebrovascular Events in Patients with Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Kim, Y. D.
    Robson, D.
    Macdonald, P. S.
    Spratt, P.
    Jansz, P.
    Hayward, C. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (04): : S427 - S427
  • [26] Trauma in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Sarsam, Sinan H.
    Meyers, Deborah E.
    Civitello, Andrew B.
    Agunanne, Enoch E.
    Odegaard, Peggy
    Cohn, William E.
    Frazier, O. H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 112 (09): : 1520 - 1522
  • [27] Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Lamba, H. K.
    Santiago, A.
    Kurihara, C.
    Kawabori, M.
    Sugiura, T.
    Eskew, J.
    Alnajar, A.
    Cheema, F. H.
    Civitello, A. B.
    Delgado, R.
    Simpson, L.
    Nair, A. P.
    Rosengart, T. K.
    Frazier, O.
    Morgan, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (04): : S385 - S386
  • [28] Preoperative Risk Factors for Early Mortality in Patients Bridged to Transplant with a Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Healy, A. H.
    Stehlik, J.
    Edwards, L. B.
    McKellar, S. H.
    Drakos, S. G.
    Selzman, C. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04): : S56 - S56
  • [29] Rehospitalization Characteristics in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Thomas, Sunu S.
    Han, Jason
    Nahumi, Nadav
    Lippel, Matthew
    Garan, Arthur R.
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Colombo, Paolo
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Uriel, Nir
    Jorde, Ulrich P.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [30] Discharge Outcomes in Children Supported With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Chen, S.
    Lin, A.
    Liu, E.
    May, L. J.
    Doan, L. N.
    Maeda, K.
    Reinhartz, O.
    Hollander, S. A.
    Almond, C. S.
    Rosenthal, D. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 34 (04): : S324 - S324