Assessment of HER2 status in invasive breast cancers with increased centromere 17 copy number

被引:23
|
作者
Jang, Min Hye [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Eun Joo [1 ]
Kim, Hyun Jeong [1 ]
Chung, Yul Ri [2 ]
Park, So Yeon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Pathol, Songnam 463707, Gyeonggi, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Seoul 151, South Korea
关键词
Breast cancer; HER2; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Polysomy; 17; Reference gene; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; CHROMOSOME-17; POLYSOMY; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; HER-2/NEU STATUS; GENE STATUS; AMPLIFICATION; TRUE; RECOMMENDATIONS; CARCINOMAS; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-015-3522-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study was designed to evaluate usefulness of additional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using other reference genes on chromosome 17 for assessment of HER2 status in invasive breast cancers with increased centromere 17 copy number, and to compare this approach with conventional methods based on the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. We performed FISH with probes for SMS, RARA, and TP53 on 253 breast cancers with centromeric probe CEP17 copy number a parts per thousand yen2.6 using tissue microarrays. If one or more gene had a mean copy number < 2.6, the largest number for that gene(s) was chosen as an alternative to CEP17 copy number. Of the 243 cases in which re-grading was possible, only 2 had copy numbers a parts per thousand yen2.6 for RARA, SMS, and TP53. Of the 151 breast cancers which were considered HER2 non-amplified by the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines using the HER2:CEP17 ratio, 42 (27.8 %) were re-graded as amplified and 33 (21.8 %) as equivocal after FISH using additional reference genes. Of the 101 HER2-non-amplified cases by the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines, 2 (2.0 %) were reclassified as amplified and 24 (23.8 %) as equivocal. Of 46 equivocal cases, 35 (76.1 %) were re-graded as amplified. After re-grading, HER2-amplified cases were significantly increased, and the concordance between HER2 FISH and HER2 immunohistochemistry decreased. And some pathologic features of the cases which were designated to have HER2 amplification after additional FISH were not compatible with those of HER2-amplified breast cancers. The use of additional reference genes has been suggested as an option for accurate assessment of HER2 status in breast cancers with increased CEP17 copy number. However, this has limitations in that it can cause over-grading of HER2 status in tumors that lose the new reference genes. Thus, at present, it seems that additional FISH using other reference gene such as SMS, RARA, and TP53 for the cases with increased CEP17 copy number is not suitable for daily practice.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 77
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast cancers with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2.0 or greater and an average HER2 copy number of less than 4.0 per cell: frequency, immunohistochemical correlation, and clinicopathological features
    Zare, Somaye Y.
    Lin, Leo
    Alghamdi, Abrar G.
    Daehne, Svenja
    Roma, Andres A.
    Hasteh, Farnaz
    Dell'Aquila, Marie
    Fadare, Oluwole
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 83 : 7 - 13
  • [42] Tumoral heterogeneity and HER2 status in invasive breast cancer
    Asselah, J.
    Cottu, P.
    Vincent-Salomon, A.
    Dieras, V
    Mignot, L.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2007, 94 (06) : 568 - 568
  • [43] Automatization of HER2 Status Assessment in Breast Cancer
    Makhov, Denis
    Samorodov, Andrey
    Slavnova, Elena
    2019 URAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, RADIOELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (USBEREIT), 2019, : 171 - 173
  • [44] Genomic Copy Number Analysis of HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers
    Geiersbach, Katherine B.
    Willmore-Payne, Carlynn
    Pasi, Alexandra V.
    Paxton, Christian N.
    Werner, Theresa L.
    Xu, Xinjie
    Wittwer, Carl T.
    Gulbahce, H. Evin
    Downs-Kelly, Erinn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 146 (04) : 439 - 447
  • [45] Relationship between pathological features, HER2 protein expression and HER2 and CEP17 copy number in breast cancer: biological and methodological considerations
    Lambein, Kathleen
    Praet, Marleen
    Forsyth, Ramses
    Van den Broecke, Rudy
    Braems, Geert
    Matthys, Bart
    Cocquyt, Veronique
    Denys, Hannelore
    Pauwels, Patrick
    Libbrecht, Louis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (03) : 200 - 207
  • [46] HER2 gene copy number and breast cancer- specific survival
    Biserni, Giovanni B.
    Engstrom, Monica J.
    Bofin, Anna M.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 69 (05) : 871 - 879
  • [47] HER2 copy number on FISH as a predictor of disease severity in HER2-breast cancer
    Abedin, S.
    Kruse, M.
    Brufsky, A.
    Bhargava, R.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [48] HER2 Intermediate Breast Cancers
    Jensen, Kristin C.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    Gilks, C. Blake
    West, Robert B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 33 (11) : 1739 - 1739
  • [49] Expression of understudied genes with copy number gains in breast cancer: dependence on ER, PR, and HER2 status
    Berkel, Caglar
    NUCLEUS-INDIA, 2024,
  • [50] 2021 update of the GEFPICS' recommendations for HER2 status assessment in invasive breast cancer in France
    Franchet, Camille
    Djerroudi, Lounes
    Maran-Gonzalez, Aurelie
    Abramovici, Olivia
    Antoine, Martine
    Becette, Veronique
    Berghian, Anca
    Blanc-Fournier, Cecile
    Brabencova, Eva
    Charafe-Jauffret, Emmanuelle
    Chenard, Marie-Pierre
    Dauplat, Marie-Melanie
    Delree, Paul
    Duprez-Paumier, Raphaelle
    Fleury, Clemence
    Ghnassia, Jean-Pierre
    Haudebourg, Juliette
    Leroux, Agnes
    MacGrogan, Gaetan
    Mathieu, Marie-Christine
    Michenet, Patrick
    Penault-Llorca, Frederique
    Poulet, Bruno
    Robin, Yves Marie
    Roger, Pascal
    Russ, Elisabeth
    Tixier, Lucie
    Treilleux, Isabelle
    Valent, Alexander
    Verriele, Veronique
    Vincent-Salomon, Anne
    Arnould, Laurent
    Lacroix-Triki, Magali
    ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2021, 41 (06) : 507 - 520