Contribution of the oocyte to embryo quality

被引:416
|
作者
Sirard, MA [1 ]
Richard, F [1 ]
Blondin, P [1 ]
Robert, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Ctr Rech Biol Reprod, Dept Anim Sci, Ste Foy, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
oocyte competence; follicle; RNA; differentiation;
D O I
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.020
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The ability of a bovine embryo to develop to the blastocyst stage, to implant and to generate a healthy offspring is not a simple process. To clarify the importance of the contribution of the oocyte to the embryo quality, it is important to define more precisely the different types of competence expressed by oocytes. The ability to resume meiosis, to cleave upon fertilization to develop into a blastocyst, to induce pregnancy and to generate an healthy offspring are all separate events and succeeding in the first events does not ensure the success of subsequent ones. Furthermore, these events are associated with the three types of maturation processes observed in the oocyte: meiotic, cytoplasmic and molecular. These abilities vary also upon the type of follicle the oocytes is removed from. Larger or slow-growing follicles have been shown to foster better eggs than small or actively growing follicles. Hormonal stimulation can also affect oocyte competence with the nature of the effect (positive or negative) depending on timing and dose. This complex situation requires better definition of the contribution of each factor affecting the oocyte competence and the resulting embryo quality. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 136
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of menotropin luteinising hormone content on oocyte and embryo quality
    Gordon, UD
    ROLE OF LUTEINIZING HORMONE IN FOLLICULOGENESIS AND OVULATION INDUCTION, 1999, : 201 - 210
  • [42] Relationship between daily number of oocyte pickups and embryo quality
    Laverge, H
    Van der Elst, J
    De Sutter, P
    Dhont, M
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 : 248 - 248
  • [43] Controlled spermatozoa–oocyte interaction improves embryo quality in sheep
    Debora Agata Anzalone
    Luca Palazzese
    Marta Czernik
    Annalaura Sabatucci
    Luca Valbonetti
    Emanuele Capra
    Pasqualino Loi
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [44] Oocyte quality and embryo selection strategies: a review for the embryologists, by the embryologists
    Anagnostopoulou, Christina
    Maldonado Rosas, Israel
    Singh, Neha
    Gugnani, Nivita
    Chockalingham, Annapoorani
    Singh, Keerti
    Desai, Dimple
    Darbandi, Mahsa
    Manoharan, Madhumitha
    Darbandi, Sara
    Leonardi Diaz, Sofia I.
    Gupta, Sajal
    Henkel, Ralf
    Sallam, Hassan N.
    Boitrelle, Florence
    Wirka, Kelly A.
    Agarwal, Ashok
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2022, 64 (02) : 171 - 184
  • [45] Drinking water quality impacts oocyte viability and embryo development
    Winstanley, Yasmyn E.
    Gonzalez, Macarena B.
    Andreas, Eryk
    Connaughton, Haley
    Bergen, Jean
    Ween, Miranda
    Russell, Darryl L.
    Shearer, Cameron J.
    Robertson, Sarah A.
    Robker, Rebecca L.
    FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 6
  • [46] The effect of propofol anaesthesia on oocyte fertilization and early embryo quality
    Ben-Shlomo, I
    Moskovich, R
    Golan, J
    Eyali, V
    Tabak, A
    Shalev, E
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (10) : 2197 - 2199
  • [47] Study of the effect of clomiphene citrate on oocyte and embryo quality using the oocyte donation model.
    Raigosa, G
    Arango, A
    Escobar, E
    Giraldo, J
    Cano, JF
    Posada, MN
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S94 - S95
  • [48] Oocyte-Somatic Cell Interactions and Ovulation Rate: Effects on Oocyte Quality and Embryo Yield
    Mcnatty, Kenneth P.
    Juengel, Jennifer L.
    Pitman, Janet L.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY INSIGHTS, 2014, 7 : 1 - 8
  • [49] The difference in embryo quality between Belclare and Suffolk ewes is not due to differences in oocyte quality
    Fair, S.
    Hanrahan, J. P.
    Ward, F.
    O'Meara, C. M.
    Duffy, P.
    Donovan, A.
    Lonergan, P.
    Evans, A. C. O.
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2006, 66 (02) : 191 - 197