Renewable electricity generation in Germany: A meta-analysis of mitigation scenarios

被引:25
|
作者
Schmid, Eva [1 ]
Pahle, Michael [1 ]
Knopf, Brigitte [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Energy strategy; Energy system model; Transformation costs; COSTS; FRAMEWORK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.105
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
German energy policy targets envision a share of electricity from renewable energy sources (RES-E) of at least 80% in 2050. How can the transformation of the German electricity sector be achieved and at what costs? This paper addresses these questions by means of a meta-analysis of 10 recent model-based mitigation scenarios for Germany. It turns out that the scenarios exploit the three basic strategic options of increasing the share of RES-E - domestic RES-E generation, electricity demand reductions, and RES-E imports - to substantially different extents. Domestic RES-E generation increases in all scenarios, particularly from onshore and offshore wind. Scenarios that rely heavily on reducing electricity demand require a relatively low expansion of domestic RES-E generation. Despite detailed technical analyses, insights on the costs of the transformation remain limited. A discussion of underlying scenario assumptions reveals that it is unclear whether (i) RES-E and system integration technology development will be as cost-competitive as postulated, (ii) implicitly assumed institutional requirements will be realized, and (iii) relevant actors in the transformation process will be incentivized accordingly. Therefore, future research should pursue a thorough assessment of strategic options for transforming the German electricity system that consistently integrates technologies, institutions, and actors. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1163
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Water use of electricity technologies: A global meta-analysis
    Jin, Yi
    Behrens, Paul
    Tukker, Arnold
    Scherer, Laura
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 115
  • [42] Does Daylight Saving Save Electricity? A Meta-Analysis
    Havranek, Tomas
    Herman, Dominik
    Irsova, Zuzana
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (02): : 35 - 61
  • [43] Do renewable electricity policies promote renewable electricity generation? Evidence from panel data
    Zhao, Yong
    Tang, Kam Ki
    Wang, Li-li
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 887 - 897
  • [44] ENERGY SWITCH IN GERMANY: 100% RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY BY 2050
    Foth, Heidi
    Bohm, Soenke
    [J]. CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS RELATED TO SHIPPING: AN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK, 2013, : 53 - 65
  • [45] Power generation scenarios for Cameroon: Valorisation of biomass for the reduction of electricity transmission and the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050
    Kouer, Joel Placide
    Meukam, Pierre
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2023, 180 : 487 - 510
  • [46] Characterisation and mitigation of renewable droughts in the Australian National Electricity Market
    Boston, Andy
    Bongers, Geoffrey D.
    Bongers, Nathan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 4 (03):
  • [47] GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY IN FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
    TEICHMANN, E
    [J]. ELEKTROTECHNISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT B-AUSGABE, 1973, 25 (05): : 90 - 91
  • [48] ELECTRICITY-GENERATION FROM RENEWABLE ENERGY-SOURCES IN GERMANY - POTENTIALS, COSTS AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
    WIESE, A
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 1994, 5 (5-8) : 1390 - 1393
  • [49] Meta-analysis of the greenhouse gases emissions of nuclear electricity generation: learnings for process-based LCA
    Le Boulch, Denis
    Buronfosse, Mickael
    Le Guern, Yannick
    Duvernois, Pierre-Alexis
    Payen, Noemie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (05): : 857 - 872
  • [50] Meta-analysis of the greenhouse gases emissions of nuclear electricity generation: learnings for process-based LCA
    Denis Le Boulch
    Mickael Buronfosse
    Yannick Le Guern
    Pierre-Alexis Duvernois
    Noëmie Payen
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 857 - 872