Evaluating a department's research: Testing the Leiden methodology in business and management

被引:9
|
作者
Mingers, John [1 ]
Lipitakis, Evangelia A. E. C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury CT7 2PE, Kent, England
关键词
Crown indicator; Research quality assessment; Citations; Leiden methodology; Business and management; CITATION; INDICATORS; RANKING; SCIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2012.11.002
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Leiden methodology (LM), also sometimes called the "crown indicator", is a quantitative method for evaluating the research quality of a research group or academic department based on the citations received by the group in comparison to averages for the field. There have been a number of applications but these have mainly been in the hard sciences where the data on citations, provided by the ISI Web of Science (WoS), is more reliable. In the social sciences, including business and management, many journals and books are not included within WoS and so the LM has not been tested here. In this research study the LM has been applied on a dataset of over 3000 research publications from three UK business schools. The results show that the LM does indeed discriminate between the schools, and has a degree of concordance with other forms of evaluation, but that there are significant limitations and problems within this discipline. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 595
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The VIPLAN Methodology in Management Research
    Harwood, Stephen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (ECRM2016), 2016, : 117 - 125
  • [32] Evaluating Business Intelligence Software - Testing the SSAV Model
    Amara, Yasmina
    Solberg Soilen, Klaus
    Jenster, Per
    Vriens, Dirk
    ECIS 2009: THIRD EUROPEAN COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE SYMPOSIUM, 2009, : 238 - 251
  • [33] Evaluating Research: Methodology for People Who Need to Read Research
    Warren, Tom
    TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2011, 58 (02) : 169 - 170
  • [34] Evaluating Research: Methodology for People Who Need to Read Research
    Coryn, Chris L. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2011, 32 (01) : 152 - 154
  • [35] Methodology for evaluating mental health case management
    Bryant, DM
    Bickman, L
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 1996, 19 (02) : 121 - 129
  • [36] Development of a research methodology for assessing a firm's business process-related technologies
    Chapelet, B
    Tovstiga, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1998, 15 (1-2) : 10 - 30
  • [37] Use of Factor V Leiden genetic testing in practice and impact on management
    Laberge, Anne-Marie
    Psaty, Bruce M.
    Hindorff, Lucia A.
    Burke, Wylie
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (10) : 750 - 756
  • [38] Research on business process management
    Huang, Xiaoxia
    Mei, Shaozu
    Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information and Management Sciences, 2004, 3 : 70 - 72
  • [39] MARKETING RESEARCH AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
    Simmons, Leo T.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1952, 17 (02) : 220 - 221
  • [40] Qualitative Research in Business & Management
    Sharma, Umesh
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 6 (04): : 292 - 296