Birth order, sibship size, and risk for germ-cell testicular cancer

被引:45
|
作者
Richiardi, L
Akre, O
Lambe, M
Granath, F
Montgomery, SM
Ekbom, A
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Turin, Canc Epidemiol Unit, CeRMS, Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Turin, Ctr Oncol Prevent, Turin, Italy
[4] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Med, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ede.0000120043.45185.7e
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Several studies have reported an inverse association between birth order and testicular cancer risk, but estimates vary greatly and the biologic mechanism underlying the association is not established. Methods: We have evaluated the effect of birth order, sibship size, and the combined effect of these 2 variables in relation to risk for testicular cancer in a large, nested case-control study. Specifically, we compared 3051 patients with germ-cell testicular cancer (diagnosed between 1958 and 1998 and identified through the Swedish Cancer Registry) with 9007 population control subjects. Using record linkage with the Multi-General ion Register and the Census, we obtained information on number, order, and sex of the subjects' siblings, parental age, and paternal socioeconomic status. Results: Both birth order and sibship size had an inverse and monotonically decreasing association with testicular cancer risk after adjusting for parental age, paternal socioeconomic status, and twin status. The associations were modified by subjects' cohort of birth and were not present among those born after 1959. The odds ratio for having at least 3 siblings, compared with none, was 0.63 (95% confidence interval = 0.53-0.75) among subjects born before 1960. Stratified analyses showed that birth order and number of younger siblings had a similar inverse association with the risk for testicular cancer. Conclusions: Sibship size, and not only birth order, is associated with testicular cancer risk. This suggests a higher prevalence of parental subfertility among patients with testicular cancer.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:323 / 329
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Testicular germ-cell cancer (vol 367, pg 754, 2006)
    Harwich, A
    Shipley, J
    Huddart, R
    LANCET, 2006, 367 (9520): : 1398 - 1398
  • [42] Perinatal determinants of germ-cell testicular cancer in relation to histological subtypes
    Richiardi, L
    Akre, O
    Bellocco, R
    Ekbom, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 87 (05) : 545 - 550
  • [43] NON-SEMINOMA GERM-CELL TESTICULAR CANCER - A SUCCESS STORY
    COLLS, BM
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 14 (06): : 950 - 950
  • [44] Future prospects in the chemotherapy of metastatic nonseminomatous testicular germ-cell cancer
    Hartmann, JT
    Kuczyk, MA
    Kollmannsberger, C
    Kanz, L
    Bokemeyer, C
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) : 324 - 333
  • [45] OVARIAN GERM-CELL MALIGNANCIES IN ENGLAND - EPIDEMIOLOGIC PARALLELS WITH TESTICULAR CANCER
    SILVA, ID
    SWERDLOW, AJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 63 (05) : 814 - 818
  • [46] Future prospects in the chemotherapy of metastatic nonseminomatous testicular germ-cell cancer
    J. T. Hartmann
    M. A. Kuczyk
    C. Kollmannsberger
    L. Kanz
    C. Bokemeyer
    World Journal of Urology, 1999, 17 : 324 - 333
  • [47] Perinatal determinants of germ-cell testicular cancer in relation to histological subtypes
    L Richiardi
    O Akre
    R Bellocco
    A Ekbom
    British Journal of Cancer, 2002, 87 : 545 - 550
  • [48] PATERNITY IN PATIENTS WITH TESTICULAR GERM-CELL CANCER - PRETREATMENT AND POSTTREATMENT FINDINGS
    HANSEN, PV
    GLAVIND, K
    PANDURO, J
    PEDERSEN, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 27 (11) : 1385 - 1389
  • [49] Testicular germ-cell cancer (vol 337, pg 242, 1997)
    Bosl, GJ
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (19): : 1403 - 1403
  • [50] Curing metastatic cancer:: Lessons from testicular germ-cell tumours
    Masters, JRW
    Köberle, B
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2003, 3 (07) : 517 - 525