FDG PET Uptake as a Predictor of Pain Response in Palliative Radiation Therapy in Patients with Bone Metastasis

被引:17
|
作者
Adli, Mustafa [1 ]
Kuzhan, Abdurrahman [1 ]
Alkis, Hilal [1 ]
Andic, Fundagul [1 ]
Yilmaz, Mustafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gaziantep, Turkey
[2] Gaziantep Univ, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med, Gaziantep, Turkey
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; BREAST-CANCER; LUNG-CANCER; NECK-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY TRIALS; RECTAL-CANCER; HEAD; PROLIFERATION;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.13121981
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and pain response to radiation therapy (RT) in patients with bone metastasis. Materials and Methods: Institutional ethical board approval for the study was obtained, with informed consent, for this prospective study. Thirty-one patients with metastatic bone pain who underwent FDG PET/computed tomography before RT were included. Patients were diagnosed with lung (n = 16), breast (n = 7), stomach (n = 2), and head and neck cancers (n = 3), as well as unknown primary tumor (n = 3). Eighty-five painful metastatic locations with FDG PET scans geographically corresponding to 40 treatment fields were evaluated. Pain scores using visual analog scale or faces pain rating scale and SUVmax at each location were recorded. All patients were treated with a single fraction 8 Gy RT. Pain scores after RT were assessed at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. The pretreatment pain scores and pain response to RT were compared with FDG PET SUVmax of each location. Pearson correlation, independent t test, one-way analysis of variance, and chi(2) tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Median SUVmax and initial pain scores for all locations were 7.2 (range, 1.5-22.5) and 6 (range, 2-8), respectively. Median follow-up time was 24 (range, 3-112) weeks. Median SUVmax was 4.5 (range, 3.1-7.3), 4.75 (range, 1.5-10.3), 8.8 (range, 5.2-11.9), and 12.1 (range, 7-22.5) for pretreatment pain scores of 2, 4, 6, and 8, respectively. SUVmax was correlated with pretreatment pain scores (P < .0001). SUVmax and pretreatment pain scores were also significantly associated with pain response to RT. Median SUVmax for locations with complete response, partial response, pain progression, and indeterminate response was 5.2, 9.75, 10.8, and 6.4, respectively (P <= .001). Conclusion: FDG PET SUVmax correlated with initial pain severity and pain response to RT and can be used as a predictive factor for treatment response in patients with painful bone metastasis treated with palliative RT. (C) RSNA, 2013
引用
收藏
页码:850 / 856
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FDG-PET as a Predictor of Outcome Following Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastasis in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chang, J.
    Choi, S.
    Jeong, Y.
    Yun, M.
    Seong, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S564 - S564
  • [2] FDG PET as a predictor of response to resynchronisation therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    C. M. C. van Campen
    Frans C. Visser
    Arno P. van der Weerdt
    Paul Knaapen
    Emile F. I. Comans
    Adriaan A. Lammertsma
    Carel C. de Cock
    Cees A. Visser
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2007, 34 : 309 - 315
  • [3] FDG PET as a predictor of response to resynchronisation therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    van Campen, C. M. C.
    Visser, Frans C.
    van der Weerdt, Arno P.
    Knaapen, Paul
    Comans, Emile F. I.
    Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
    de Cock, Carel C.
    Visser, Cees A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (03) : 309 - 315
  • [4] PET-FDG as predictor of therapy response in patients with colorectal carcinoma
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A
    Strauss, LG
    Rudi, J
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 47 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [5] FDG PET predicts pain response and local control in palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer
    Zhao, Fen
    Li, Minghuan
    Fu, Zheng
    Yang, Guoren
    Kong, Li
    Yu, Jinming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03)
  • [6] The Use of 18FDG-PET Standard Uptake Value as a Metabolic Predictor of Bone Marrow Response to Radiation: Impact on Acute and Late Hematological Toxicity in Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Chemoradiation Therapy
    Elicin, O.
    Herrera, F.
    Callaway, S.
    Prior, J.
    Ozsahin, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S32 - S32
  • [7] FDG-PET predicts outcomes of treated bone metastasis following palliative radiotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Choi, Seo Hee
    Chang, Jee Suk
    Jeong, Yong Hyu
    Lee, Youngin
    Yun, Mijin
    Seong, Jinsil
    [J]. LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 34 (07) : 1118 - 1125
  • [8] [18F] FDG-PET Standard Uptake Value as a Metabolic Predictor of Bone Marrow Response to Radiation: Impact on Acute and Late Hematological Toxicity in Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Chemoradiation Therapy
    Elicin, Olgun
    Callaway, Sharon
    Prior, John O.
    Bourhis, Jean
    Ozsahin, Mahmut
    Herrera, Fernanda G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 (05): : 1099 - 1107
  • [9] Prevalence of adrenal uptake on FDG PET in patients with NSCLC and the ability of FDG PET to diagnose adrenal metastasis.
    Beaulieu, S
    Aikawa, T
    Takasugi, JE
    Vesselle, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 44 (05) : 390P - 390P
  • [10] FDG-PET Predicts Pain Response and Local Control in Palliative Radiotherapy With or Without Systemic Treatment in Patients With Bone Metastasis From Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
    Zhao, Fen
    Ding, Gang
    Huang, Wei
    Li, Minghuan
    Fu, Zheng
    Yang, Guoren
    Kong, Li
    Zhang, Yan
    Yu, Jinming
    [J]. CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2015, 16 (06) : E111 - E119