PET-FDG as predictor of therapy response in patients with colorectal carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A
Strauss, LG
Rudi, J
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Theresien Krankenhaus, Dept Internal Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Med PET Grp Biol Imaging E0105, Div Diagnost Oncol & Therapy, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE | 2003年 / 47卷 / 01期
关键词
tomography; emission computed; fludeoxyglucose F18; colonic neoplasms; radionuclide imaging; rectal neoplasms;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of quantitative dynamic FDG PET studies in patients with metastastic colorectal cancer receiving FOLFOX (fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy. Methods. The evaluation includes 28 patients with 55 metastases; from primary colorectal cancer. Reference for the FDG studies was the clinical response data, according to the WHO classification. Three response groups were defined: progressive disease (PD), stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR). The FDG studies were accomplished as dynamic series for 60 min. The evaluation of the FDG kinetics was performed using the SUV, and fractal dimension (FD) of the time activity curves based on the box counting procedure (parameter for the inhomogeneity of the tumors). Results. The median SUV as measured in the tumor lesions prior to onset to FOLFOX was 3.15, in comparison with 2.68 SUV after the first cycle and 2.61 SUV after the second cycle. Discriminant analysis (DA) was used for the classification of the data into the 3 categories. Both parameters SUV and FD provided 2 of the 3 "predicted" categories, namely PD and SD. It was possible to correctly classify PR in only 10% of the patients, using the FD of both studies. Generally,. DA inclined to misclassify the data towards. PD. Even the first PET study was predictive with respect to therapy outcome (96% for PD and 47% for SD using only the baseline SUV). Metastases with a baseline SUV lower than 4.6 did not respond to FOLFOX chemotherapy. The combination of SUV and FD of the first study lead to a correct classification of 93% of PD and 60% of SD. Best results were obtained for the FD of the initial PET study (90% for PD and 75% for SD) as well as for the FD of both studies (77% for PD, 73% for SD, 10% for PR). Conclusion: Quantitative, dynamic FDG-PET should be used preferentially for monitoring patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy. Even the first FDG study prior to onset to chemotherapy is predictive for the therapy outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PET-FDG IMAGING FOR PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA
    GUPTA, NC
    FALK, P
    FRANK, AR
    THORSON, A
    BOMAN, B
    FRICK, MP
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 109 - 109
  • [2] Whole body PET-FDG in patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma: Comparison with CT.
    Imbriaco, M
    Yeung, HWD
    Macapinlac, H
    Zhang, JJ
    Kemeny, N
    Cohen, A
    Finn, RD
    Larson, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (05) : 512 - 512
  • [3] FDG PET as a predictor of response to resynchronisation therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    C. M. C. van Campen
    Frans C. Visser
    Arno P. van der Weerdt
    Paul Knaapen
    Emile F. I. Comans
    Adriaan A. Lammertsma
    Carel C. de Cock
    Cees A. Visser
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2007, 34 : 309 - 315
  • [4] FDG PET as a predictor of response to resynchronisation therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    van Campen, C. M. C.
    Visser, Frans C.
    van der Weerdt, Arno P.
    Knaapen, Paul
    Comans, Emile F. I.
    Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
    de Cock, Carel C.
    Visser, Cees A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (03) : 309 - 315
  • [5] PET-FDG: Impetus
    Nanni, Cristina
    [J]. CANCERS, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [6] Whole body PET-FDG imaging for monitoring therapy and predicting treatment response in lymphoma patients.
    Gupta, N
    Mallidi, P
    Qazil, M
    Sehbai, A
    Mullett, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2002, 43 (05) : 263P - 263P
  • [7] PET-FDG OF PLEOMORPHIC XANTHOASTROCYTOMA
    BICIK, I
    RAMAN, R
    KNIGHTLY, JJ
    DICHIRO, G
    FULHAM, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1995, 36 (01) : 97 - 99
  • [8] Detection of stomach peritoneal infiltration in colorectal cancer using PET-FDG
    Grande, LD
    Bueno, JG
    Fernández, JPS
    Suárez, AM
    Zomeño, M
    Oromendía, AO
    Kosvintseva, O
    Pozo, MA
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 30 (02) : 122 - 123
  • [9] An evaluation of FDG-PET as a predictor of metabolic response to chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC).
    Van Damme, N.
    De Bruyne, S.
    Mertens, J.
    Van de Wiele, C.
    Ceelen, W. P.
    Smeets, P.
    Ferdinande, L.
    Laurent, S.
    Geboes, K.
    Peeters, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [10] PET-FDG IMAGING IN THE ABDOMEN AND PELVIS
    MANTIL, JC
    JACOBS, M
    PETERSON, C
    HWANG, D
    BANKS, W
    SATTER, M
    EZZEDINE, B
    BORCHERT, R
    NICKERSON, J
    DUNIGAN, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1993, 34 (05) : P218 - P219