Multi-objective optimization of reciprocal timber layouts from reclaimed stock elements

被引:0
|
作者
Parigi, Dario [1 ]
Damkilde, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Thomas Mann Vej 23, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
reuse; upcycling; reciprocal structures; sustainability; tectonics; construction; optimization; timber structures;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The constructive dimension of structures becomes more important today as the question of sustainability encompasses a broader scope in regards to material use. The inclusion of construction constraints within the digital design process enable novel design approaches, such as design and construction based on reuse of reclaimed material. Reciprocal structures were used in the past for different purposes, but in this context, it is worth noting their use for solving the practical issue of spanning distances especiallly in slabs when the available elements were shorter than the span. The use of reciprocally connected elements allows defining a set of variables that allows adapting to design constraints and goals related to structure and construction. Computational strategies are investigated to generate layouts that are able to span planar configurations with non-standard reclaimed elements. This work presents an optimization study for the design of standardized structural layouts for floors and/or walls, using the SPEA-II Multi Objective method. A set of geometrical and material parameters are defined for modelling the panel architecture, while competing objective functions are defined related primarily to aspects such as structural lightness and efficiency in construction. The results are presented in the form of Pareto optimal sets, from which conclusions can be drawn for the design of cost effective panels from reclaimed elements.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    [J]. GECCO-2010 COMPANION PUBLICATION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH ANNUAL GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2010, : 2577 - 2602
  • [32] Multi-objective Whale Optimization
    Kumawat, Ishwar Ram
    Nanda, Satyasai Jagannath
    Maddila, Ravi Kumar
    [J]. TENCON 2017 - 2017 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, 2017, : 2747 - 2752
  • [33] Splitting for Multi-objective Optimization
    Qibin Duan
    Dirk P. Kroese
    [J]. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 2018, 20 : 517 - 533
  • [34] Splitting for Multi-objective Optimization
    Duan, Qibin
    Kroese, Dirk P.
    [J]. METHODOLOGY AND COMPUTING IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2018, 20 (02) : 517 - 533
  • [35] Progressive Multi-Objective Optimization
    Sorensen, Kenneth
    Springael, Johan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2014, 13 (05) : 917 - 936
  • [36] Multi-objective optimization (MO)
    Balling, RJ
    [J]. OPTIMAIZATION IN INDUSTRY, 2002, : 337 - 338
  • [37] The Multi-Objective Polynomial Optimization
    Nie, Jiawang
    Yang, Zi
    [J]. MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [38] Evolutionary multi-objective optimization
    Coello Coello, Carlos A.
    Hernandez Aguirre, Arturo
    Zitzler, Eckart
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (03) : 1617 - 1619
  • [39] Multi-objective chicken swarm optimization: A novel algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems
    Zouache, Djaafar
    Arby, Yahya Quid
    Nouioua, Farid
    Ben Abdelaziz, Fouad
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 129 : 377 - 391
  • [40] Soft and transferable pseudopotentials from multi-objective optimization
    Shojaei, Mostafa Faghih
    Pask, John E.
    Medford, Andrew J.
    Suryanarayana, Phanish
    [J]. COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 283