Assessing children's competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study

被引:34
|
作者
Hein, Irma M. [1 ]
Troost, Pieter W. [1 ]
Lindeboom, Robert [2 ]
de Vries, Martine C. [3 ]
Zwaan, C. Michel [4 ]
Lindauer, Ramon J. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Div Clin Methods & Publ Hlth, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Eth & Hlth Law, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Pediat Oncol & Hematol, NL-3015 GJ Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
BMC PEDIATRICS | 2012年 / 12卷
关键词
Competence; Consent; Assessment; Tool; Drug trial; Informed consent; Decision making; Research; Child; Adolescent; DECISION-MAKING; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; MENTAL-CAPACITY; ADOLESCENTS; JUDGMENTS; ATTITUDES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2431-12-156
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Currently over 50% of drugs prescribed to children have not been evaluated properly for use in their age group. One key reason why children have been excluded from clinical trials is that they are not considered able to exercise meaningful autonomy over the decision to participate. Dutch law states that competence to consent can be presumed present at the age of 12 and above; however, in pediatric practice children's competence is not that clearly presented and the transition from assent to active consent is gradual. A gold standard for competence assessment in children does not exist. In this article we describe a study protocol on the development of a standardized tool for assessing competence to consent in research in children and adolescents. Methods/design: In this study we modified the MacCAT-CR, the best evaluated competence assessment tool for adults, for use in children and adolescents. We will administer the tool prospectively to a cohort of pediatric patients from 6 to 18 years during the selection stages of ongoing clinical trials. The outcomes of the MacCAT-CR interviews will be compared to a reference standard, established by the judgments of clinical investigators, and an expert panel consisting of child psychiatrists, child psychologists and medical ethicists. The reliability, criterion-related validity and reproducibility of the tool will be determined. As MacCAT-CR is a multi-item scale consisting of 13 items, power was justified at 130-190 subjects, providing a minimum of 10-15 observations per item. MacCAT-CR outcomes will be correlated with age, life experience, IQ, ethnicity, socio-economic status and competence judgment of the parent(s). It is anticipated that 160 participants will be recruited over 2 years to complete enrollment. Discussion: A validity study on an assessment tool of competence to consent is strongly needed in research practice, particularly in the child and adolescent population. In this study we will establish a reference standard of children's competence to consent, combined with validation of an assessment instrument. Results can facilitate responsible involvement of children in clinical trials by further development of guidelines, health-care policies and legal policies.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Children and informed consent: a study of children's perceptions and involvement in consent to dental treatment
    Adewumi, A
    Hector, MP
    King, JM
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2001, 191 (05) : 256 - 259
  • [32] Assessing clinical competence: a multitrait-multimethod matrix construct validity study
    Vallevand, Andrea
    Manthey, David E.
    Askew, Kim
    Hartman, Nicholas D.
    Burns, Cynthia
    Strowd, Lindsay C.
    Violato, Claudio
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 29 (02) : 567 - 585
  • [33] Assessing clinical competence: a multitrait-multimethod matrix construct validity study
    Andrea Vallevand
    David E. Manthey
    Kim Askew
    Nicholas D. Hartman
    Cynthia Burns
    Lindsay C. Strowd
    Claudio Violato
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2024, 29 : 567 - 585
  • [34] Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices
    Gibson, Barbara E.
    Stasiulis, Elaine
    Gutfreund, Shawna
    McDonald, Maria
    Dade, Lauren
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2011, 37 (08) : 504 - 509
  • [35] The Narrative Competence Task A Standardized Test to Assess Children's Narrative Skills
    Zanchi, Paola
    Zampini, Laura
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2021, 37 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [36] AUTISM PICTURE TOOL: CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE'S VIEWS ON CONSENT
    Wolstencroft, J.
    Beddall, N.
    Leyden, D.
    Heys, M.
    Skuse, D.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2023, 67 (09) : 813 - 813
  • [37] Assessing the validity of the Disability Distress Assessment Tool (DisDAT): a pilot study
    Tuffrey-Wijne, I.
    Curfs, L. M. G.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2006, 19 (03) : 252 - 252
  • [38] The acquisition of informed consent for foster children's research participation
    Bogolub, EB
    FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SERVICES, 2005, 86 (04): : 511 - 519
  • [39] Children's views on research without prior consent in emergency situations: a UK qualitative study
    Roper, Louise
    Sherratt, Frances C.
    Young, Bridget
    McNamara, Paul
    Dawson, Angus
    Appleton, Richard
    Crawley, Esther
    Frith, Lucy
    Gamble, Carrol
    Woolfall, Kerry
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (06):
  • [40] Turkish version of the Preschool Children's Nutrition Screening Tool (NutriSTEP®): a validity and reliability study
    Demir, Halime Pulat
    Turgut, Simay
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2022, 76 (08) : 1193 - 1199