Assessing Objective Image Quality Metrics for Bidirectional Texture Functions

被引:0
|
作者
Azari, Banafsheh [1 ]
Bertel, Sven [2 ]
Wuethrich, Charles A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Fac Media, CogVis MMC, Bauhausstr 11, D-99423 Weimar, Germany
[2] Flensburg Univ Appl Sci, Usabil, Kanzleistr 91-93, D-24943 Flensburg, Germany
关键词
Perceptual experiment; Realistic rendering; Visual quality metric; CORTEX;
D O I
10.24132/CSRN.2018.2801.5
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Bidirectional Texture Functions (BTFs) are view- and illumination-dependent textures used in rendering for accurate simulation of the complex reflectance behavior of fabrics. One major issue in BTF rendering is the large number and size of images which requires lots of storage. "Visually lossless" compression offers the potential to use higher compression levels without noticeable artifacts, but requires a rate-control strategy that adapts to image content and loss visibility. In this contribution, we investigate the applicability of objective image quality metrics to predict levels of perception degradation for compressed BTF textures. We apply traditional error-sensitivity and structural similarity based approaches to predict levels of perceptibility for compressed BTF textures to achieve visually lossless compression. To confirm the validity of the present study, the results of an experimental study on how decreasing the BTF texture resolution influences the perceived quality of the rendered images with the results of the applied image quality metrics are compared. In order to compare two representatives from each group were selected. The Visible Differences Predictor (VDP) and Visual Discrimination Model (VDM) are typical examples of an image quality metric based on error sensitivity, whereas the Structural SIMilarity index (SSIM) and Complex Wavelet Domain Structural Similarity Index (CWSSIM) are specific examples of a structural similarity quality measure.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Utilising objective perceptual image quality metrics for implicit link adaptation
    Kusuma, TM
    Caldera, M
    Zepernick, HJ
    ICIP: 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOLS 1- 5, 2004, : 2319 - 2322
  • [22] Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions
    Barrett, HH
    Abbey, CK
    Clarkson, E
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1998, 15 (06): : 1520 - 1535
  • [24] Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions
    Department of Radiology, Optical Sciences Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724 5067, United States
    不详
    J Opt Soc Am A, 6 (1520-1535):
  • [25] Objective Quality Metrics in Correlation with Subjective Quality Metrics for Steganography
    Wazirali, Raniyah
    Slehat, Shaher
    Chaczko, Zenon
    Borowik, Grzegorz
    Carrion, Lucia
    2015 ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED SYSTEM ENGINEERING - APCASE 2015, 2015, : 238 - 245
  • [26] Non-Local Image Reconstruction for Efficient Computation of Synthetic Bidirectional Texture Functions
    Schroeder, K.
    Klein, R.
    Zinke, A.
    COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 2013, 32 (08) : 61 - 71
  • [27] Objective video quality metrics
    Vranjes, M.
    Rimac-Drlje, S.
    Zagar, D.
    PROCEEDINGS ELMAR 2007, 2007, : 45 - 49
  • [28] Objective Quality Assessment Metrics for Light Field Image Based on Textural Features
    PhiCong, Huy
    Perry, Stuart
    Cheng, Eva
    HoangVan, Xiem
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [29] LFDD: Light field image dataset for performance evaluation of objective quality metrics
    Zizien, Adam
    Fliegel, Karel
    APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XLIII, 2020, 11510
  • [30] Comparison of Objective Image Quality Metrics to Expert Radiologists' Scoring of Diagnostic Quality of MR Images
    Mason, Allister
    Rioux, James
    Clarke, Sharon E.
    Costa, Andreu
    Schmidt, Matthias
    Keough, Valerie
    Thien Huynh
    Beyea, Steven
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 39 (04) : 1064 - 1072