Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples

被引:21
|
作者
MacLeod, Melissa A. [1 ,12 ]
Tremblay, Paul F. [2 ]
Graham, Kathryn [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bernards, Sharon [1 ]
Rehm, Jurgen [1 ,3 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Wells, Samantha [1 ,3 ,5 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Inst Mental Hlth Policy Res, 100 Collip Circle,Suite 200, London, ON N6G 4X8, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Psychol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Curtin Univ, Natl Drug Res Inst, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Fac Hlth, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] PAHO WHO Collaborating Ctr Mental Hlth Addict, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Tech Univ Dresden, Epidemiol Res Unit, Klin Psychol & Psychotherapie, Dresden, Germany
[9] Univ Toronto, Grad Dept Community Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Western Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
[12] Reg Waterloo Publ Hlth & Emergency Serv, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); disability; latent class analysis (LCA); WHODAS; PHYSICAL-DISABILITIES; USE DISORDERS; SUBSTANCE USE; NUMBER; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; DEPRESSION; CIGARETTE; SMOKING; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1002/mpr.1523
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a brief measurement tool used cross-culturally to capture the multi-dimensional nature of disablement through six domains, including: understanding and interacting with the world; moving and getting around; self-care; getting on with people; life activities; and participation in society. Previous psychometric research supports that the WHODAS 2.0 functions as a general factor of disablement. In a pooled dataset from community samples of adults (N=447) we used confirmatory factor analysis to confirm a one-factor structure. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of individuals based on their patterns of responses. We identified four distinct classes, or patterns of disablement: (1) pervasive disability; (2) physical disability; (3) emotional, cognitive, or interpersonal disability; (4) no/low disability. Convergent validity of the latent class subgroups was found with respect to socio-demographic characteristics, number of days affected by disabilities, stress, mental health, and substance use. These classes offer a simple and meaningful way to classify people with disabilities based on the 12-item WHODAS 2.0. Focusing on individuals with a high probability of being in the first three classes may help guide interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 254
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
    Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
    Bernard Sozański
    Hubert Kotarski
    Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska
    Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej
    BMC Public Health, 20
  • [22] Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Sozanski, Bernard
    Kotarski, Hubert
    Wilmowska-Pietruszynska, Anna
    Wisniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [23] DSM-5 and the Assessment of Functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
    Gold, Liza H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2014, 42 (02): : 173 - 181
  • [24] Validating the 12-item proxy-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in young children with chronic physical illness in Canada
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Dol, Megan
    Basque, Dominique
    Elgie, Melissa
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (19) : 3135 - 3142
  • [25] Measurement invariance of the 12-item self-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 across early and late adolescents in Canada
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Elgie, Melissa
    Dol, Megan
    Basque, Dominique
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (19) : 3118 - 3124
  • [26] Comparison of the 12-item and 36-item versions of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 using longitudinal data from community mental health outreach service users
    Iwanaga, Mai
    Yamaguchi, Sosei
    Sato, Sayaka
    Usui, Kaori
    Nakanishi, Kiyoaki
    Nishiuchi, Erisa
    Shimodaira, Michiyo
    So, Yugan
    Fujii, Chiyo
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 44 (02) : 457 - 463
  • [27] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0): remarks on the need to revise the WHODAS
    Castro, Shamyr
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    Coenen, Michaela
    Buchalla, Cassia Maria
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 35 (07):
  • [28] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma
    de Souza, Clarice Cristina Cunha
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    Campos, Nataly Gurgel
    Fortaleza, Simone Castelo Branco
    Madeira, Caroline Alves
    Almondes, Jardel Goncalves de Sousa
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [29] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with COPD
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    da Costa Camara, Kaytianne Jennifer
    Alves, Barbara Marques
    Aguiar Pessoa Morano, Maria Tereza
    Sampaio Viana, Cyntia Maria
    Bucharles Mont'Alverne, Daniela Gardano
    Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (19) : 5663 - 5668
  • [30] Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Gaskin, Cadeyrn J.
    Lambert, Sylvie D.
    Bowe, Steven J.
    Orellana, Liliana
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17