Comparative efficacy of preprandial or postprandial Humalog® Mix75/25™ versus glyburide in patients 60 to 80 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus

被引:28
|
作者
Herz, M
Sun, B
Milicevic, Z
Erickson, P
Fövènyi, J
Grzywa, M
Pelikanova, T
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Lilly Area Med Ctr, Vienna, Austria
[3] Peterfy Teaching Hosp, B Dept Internal Med, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Szpital Wojewodzki Nr 2, Rzeszow, Poland
[5] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Diabetes Ctr, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
type 2 diabetes mellitus; postprandial insulin lispro; insulin pens; elderly patients; oral agent failure;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(02)85006-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Humalog(R) Mix75/25(TM) (Mix75/25) is a novel premixed insulin containing 75% neutral protamine lispro (an intermediate-acting insulin) and 25% insulin lispro. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare glycemic control and hypoglycemia rates with Mix75/25 versus glyburide, and with preprandial versus postprandial Mix75/25, in patients aged 60 to 80 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus and persistent hyperglycemia on sulfonylurea therapy. Methods: In this open-label, 16-week, parallel-group study, patients were randomized to I of 2 treatments: glyburide 15 mg/d (or up to the maximum daily dose) or Mix75/25. The Mix75/25 group was randomly subdivided into preprandial (immediately before breakfast and dinner) and postprandial (within 15 minutes after the start of breakfast and dinner) injection subgroups. The primary outcomes were glycemic control and rate of hypoglycemia. Results: A total of 143 patients were randomized; 127 completed the study. The change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to end point was significantly greater with Mix75/25 than with glyburide (mean +/- SEM, -1.14% +/- 0.18% vs -0.36% +/- 0.15%, P = 0.001). HbA(1c) changes with preprandial and postprandial Mix75/25 were not significantly different (-1.20% +/- 0.26% vs -1.08% +/- 0.26%, P = 0.748). Fasting blood glucose (BG), 2-hour postprandial BG, and mean daily BG reductions were greater with Mix75/25 than with glyburide (P < 0.001); preprandial and postprandial Mix75/25 administration did not differ significantly with respect to any of these BG variables. The hypoglycemia rate increased with Mix75/25 by 0.17 +/- 0.02 episodes per patient per 30 days, but there was no change with glyburide (P = 0.077). Body weight increased by 1.02 +/- 0.35 kg with Mix75/25 and decreased by 0.85 +/- 0.18 kg with glyburide (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Compared with glyburide, Mix75/25 significantly improved glycemic control in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, could be administered after meals without compromising glycemic control, and was well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] A comparative meta-analysis of the efficacy of statin-ezetimibe co-therapy versus statin monotherapy in reducing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Miao, X-Y
    Liu, H-Z
    Jin, M-M
    Sun, B-R
    Tian, H.
    Li, J.
    Li, N.
    Yan, S-T
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (05) : 2302 - 2310
  • [32] Efficacy and Safety of Prandial Premixed Therapy Using Insulin Lispro Mix 50/50 3 Times Daily Compared With Progressive Titration of Insulin Lispro Mix 75/25 or Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30 Twice Daily in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, 16-Week, Open-Label Study
    Farcasiu, Eugenia
    Ivanyi, Tibor
    Mozejko-Pastewka, Barbara
    Birkus, Zita
    Csog, Jozsef
    Kowalska, Irina
    Coetzer, Thomas Frederic
    Bulgurlu, Sami
    Schinzel, Birgit
    Kiljanski, Jacek
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (11) : 1682 - 1693
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide versus the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin in young (< 50 years) obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Van Gaal, Luc
    Souhami, Elisabeth
    Zhou, Tianyue
    Aronson, Ronnie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 1 (02): : 31 - 37
  • [34] Efficacy of lispro mix 25 BID versus glargine QD as starter insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes stratified by baseline HbA1c: subgroup analysis of a multi-national, randomized, open-label, parallel, controlled trial (DURABLE)
    Hou, Jianing
    Cao, Dachuang
    Qian, Lei
    DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2015, 31 : 15 - 15
  • [35] A randomized, open-label, comparative, crossover trial on preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of lispro insulin u-100 versus concentrated lispro insulin u-200 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a possible contribution to greater treatment adherence
    Gentile, Sandro
    Fusco, Alessandra
    Colarusso, Sara
    Piscopo, Marco
    Improta, Maria Rosaria
    Corigliano, Marco
    Martedi, Emilia
    Oliva, Domenica
    Santorelli, Antonietta
    Simonetti, Rosa
    Giammarco, Armando
    Colella, Caterina
    Miretto, Luigia
    D'Alessandro, Alessandra
    Russo, Viviana
    Guarino, Giuseppina
    Marino, Giampiero
    Corigliano, Gerardo
    Strollo, Felice
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 17 (05) : 445 - 450