Quality of life in patients with primary and metastatic brain cancer as reported in the literature using the EORTC QLQ-BN20 and QLQ-C30

被引:1
|
作者
Chiu, Leonard [1 ]
Chiu, Nicholas [1 ]
Zeng, Liang [1 ]
Zhang, Liying [1 ]
Popovic, Marko [1 ]
Chow, Ronald [1 ]
Lam, Henry [2 ]
Poon, Michael [1 ]
Chow, Edward [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program, Dept Radiat Oncol,Odette Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Lib Serv, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
brain metastases; brain tumors; QLQ-BN20; QLQ-C30; quality of life; GLIOBLASTOMA; VALIDATION; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1586/ERP.12.70
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study is to compare the differences in quality of life (QoL) as assessed by the QLQ-BN20 and QLQ-C30 in patients with primary and metastatic brain neoplasms. A systematic literature search was conducted over the OvidSP platform in MEDLINE (1980-2012) and EMBASE (1980-2012). Studies in which the QLQ-BN20 was used as a QoL assessment for patients with malignant brain tumors (either metastatic or primary) were included in the study. Articles were included if they reported scores of at least one subscale of the QLQ-C30 or QLQ-BN20. The weighted means of the QLQ-BN20 and QLQ-C30 subscales were calculated based on sample size for included studies. Weighted analysis of variance was conducted to compare these scores in primary and metastatic brain patients. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 14 studies (16 arms: three brain metastases and 13 primary brain tumors) were identified and included in the data analysis. Fifteen of the 16 arms included QLQ-C30 scores along with QLQ-BN20 scores. Performance status of patients in both cohorts was similar. Patients with primary brain tumors and brain metastases had the following findings: physical functioning (weighted mean: 79.18 vs 74.93), global QoL (61.88 vs 59.44), role functioning (67.37 vs 75.00) and emotional functioning (70.44 vs 71.86); but none of them were statistically significantly different. Only cognitive functioning from the QLQ-C30 was significantly worse in patients with primary brain tumors (p-value = 0.0199). Despite cognitive function being significantly worse in patients with primary brain tumors, patients with metastatic brain tumors and patients with primary brain tumors have very similar QoL profiles. The study is limited by the large discrepancy in cohort sizes (1260 patients with primary brain cancer vs 183 patients with brain metastases) and the lack of clinical data.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 837
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality of life of lung cancer patients: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13
    Chie, WC
    Yang, CH
    Hsu, C
    Yang, PC
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (01) : 257 - 262
  • [32] Validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires in the measurement of quality of life of breast cancer patients in Singapore
    Tan, May Leng
    Idris, Dahliana Binte
    Teo, Lee Wah
    Loh, Soon Yue
    Seow, Gek Ching
    Chia, Yen Yen
    Tin, Aung Soe
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2014, 1 (01) : 22 - 32
  • [33] VALIDATION OF THE PROPOSED REDUCED QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE EORTC QLQ-C30 IN CUBANS PATIENTS WITH CANCER
    Viada, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A651 - A651
  • [34] Reference values for EORTC QLQ-C30 in early and metastatic breast cancer
    Mierzynska, Justyna
    Taye, Mekdes
    Pe, Madeline
    Coens, Corned
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Pogoda, Katarzyna
    Velikova, Galina
    Bjelic-Radisic, Vesna
    Cardoso, Fatima
    Brain, Etienne
    Ignatiadis, Michail
    Piccart, Martine
    Rutgers, Emiel
    Van Tienhoven, Geertjan
    Mansel, Robert
    Wildiers, Hans
    Bottomley, Andrew
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S163 - S163
  • [35] Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients
    Sneeuw, KCA
    Aaronson, NK
    Detmar, SB
    Wever, DV
    Sprangers, MAG
    Schornagel, JH
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (7-8) : 363 - 363
  • [36] Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients
    Sneeuw, KCA
    Aaronson, NK
    Sprangers, MAG
    Detmar, SB
    Wever, LDV
    Schornagel, JH
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (07) : 617 - 631
  • [37] Responsiveness of EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR38 and FACT-C quality of life questionnaires in patients with colorectal cancer
    Lionel Uwer
    Christine Rotonda
    Francis Guillemin
    Joëlle Miny
    Marie-Christine Kaminsky
    Mariette Mercier
    Laetitia Tournier-Rangeard
    Isabelle Leonard
    Philippe Montcuquet
    Philippe Rauch
    Thierry Conroy
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9
  • [38] EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PR25 - tools for assessing the quality of life of men suffering from prostate cancer
    Jurys, Tomasz
    Smolka, Mikolaj
    Dzierzawa-Kloza, Monika
    Stepanik, Michalina
    Burzynski, Bartlomiej
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 18 (01): : 61 - 67
  • [39] Quality of life measured by EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23 in patients with breast cancer
    Holzner, B
    Schweigkofler, H
    Kopp, M
    Kemmler, G
    Dunser, M
    SpernerUnterweger, B
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (7-8) : 158 - 158
  • [40] Reference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in early and metastatic breast cancer
    Mierzynska, Justyna
    Taye, Mekdes
    Pe, Madeline
    Coens, Corneel
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Pogoda, Katarzyna
    Velikova, Galina
    Bjelic-Radisic, Vesna
    Cardoso, Fatima
    Brain, Etienne
    Ignatiadis, Michail
    Piccart, Martine
    Van Tienhoven, Geertjan
    Mansel, Robert
    Wildiers, Hans
    Bottomley, Andrew
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 125 : 69 - 82