Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning

被引:4
|
作者
Wyatt, Jonathan J. [1 ,2 ]
McCallum, Hazel M. [1 ,2 ]
Maxwell, Ross J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Northern Ctr Canc Care, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Positron Emission Tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; PET-MR; Quality Assurance; QA; Radiotherapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; MRI; REPEATABILITY; SENSITIVITY; PET/CT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2022.03.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR) imaging can potentially improve radiotherapy by enabling more accurate tumour delineation and dose painting. The use of PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning requires a comprehensive Quality Assurance (QA) programme to be developed. This study aimed to develop the QA tests required and assess their repeatability and stability. Materials and methods: QA tests were developed for: MR image quality, MR geometric accuracy, electrome-chanical accuracy, PET-MR alignment accuracy, Diffusion Weighted (DW)-MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) accuracy and PET Standard Uptake Value (SUV) accuracy. Each test used a dedicated phantom and was analysed automatically or semi-automatically, with in-house software. Repeatability was evaluated by three same-day measurements with independent phantom positions. Stability was assessed through 12 monthly measurements. Results: The repeatability Standard Deviations (SDs) of distortion for the MR geometric accuracy test were <= 0.7 mm. The repeatability SDs in ADC difference from reference were <= 3% for the DW-MR accuracy test. The PET SUV difference from reference repeatability SD was 0.3%. The stability SDs agreed within 0.6 mm, 1 percentage point and 1.4 percentage points of the repeatability SDs for the geometric, ADC and SUV accuracy tests respectively. There were no monthly trends apparent. These results were representative of the other tests. Conclusions: QA Tests for radiotherapy planning PET-MR have been developed. The tests appeared repeatable and stable over a 12-month period. The developed QA tests could form the basis of a QA programme that enables high-quality, robust PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 35
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management and Organization of Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Devlin, Patricia
    Sher, Andrew
    Rubbert, Christian
    Jordan, David
    Faulhaber, Peter
    Avril, Norbert
    Ros, Pablo
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 49 (03) : 271 - 274
  • [22] Behavioral neuroimaging with positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Schneider, F
    Grodd, W
    Machulla, HJ
    NERVENARZT, 1996, 67 (09): : 721 - 729
  • [23] Imaging in laryngeal cancer: computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography
    Zinreich, SJ
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 35 (05) : 971 - +
  • [24] Positron emission tomography and radiotherapy treatment planning
    Demir, Bayram
    Okutan, Murat
    Demir, Mustafa
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 24 (02): : 88 - 97
  • [25] Imaging plaque inflammation in asymptomatic cocaine addicted individuals with simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging
    Bachi, Keren
    Mani, Venkatesh
    Kaufman, Audrey E.
    Alie, Nadia
    Goldstein, Rita Z.
    Fayad, Zahi A.
    Alia-Klein, Nelly
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 11 (05): : 62 - 73
  • [26] Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Nagarajah, James
    Buchbender, Christian
    Hoffmann, Oliver
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt Michael
    Poeppel, Thorsten
    Forsting, Michael
    Quick, Harald H.
    Umutlu, Lale
    Kinner, Sonja
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (08) : 505 - 513
  • [27] Optimizing Positron Emission Tomography Image Acquisition Protocols in Integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Hartung-Knemeyer, Verena
    Beiderwellen, Karsten J.
    Buchbender, Christian
    Kuehl, Hilmar
    Lauenstein, Thomas C.
    Bockisch, Andreas
    Poeppel, Thorsten D.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (05) : 290 - 294
  • [28] Simultaneous 68Ga DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Meningioma Target Contouring: Feasibility and Impact Upon Interobserver Variability Versus Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Maclean, J.
    Fersht, N.
    Sullivan, K.
    Kayani, I.
    Bomanji, J.
    Dickson, J.
    O'Meara, C.
    Short, S.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 29 (07) : 448 - 458
  • [29] Importance of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography as preoperative staging tests prior to liver resection
    Raoof, Mustafa
    Fong, Yuman
    TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 9
  • [30] Utility of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging in musculoskeletal imaging
    Chaudhry, Ammar A.
    Gul, Maryam
    Gould, Elaine
    Teng, Mathew
    Baker, Kevin
    Matthews, Robert
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 8 (03): : 268 - 274