Economic Impact of Smoke-Free Legislation: Did the Spanish Tobacco Control Law Affect the Economic Activity of Bars and Restaurants?

被引:6
|
作者
Garcia-Altes, Anna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pinilla, Jaime [4 ]
Mari-Dell'Olmo, Marc [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Fernandez, Esteve [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Jose Lopez, Maria [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Inst Invest Serv Sanitario IISS, Valencia, Spain
[2] CIBER Epidemiol & Publ Hlth CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Inst Invest Biomed IIB St Pau, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Quantitat Methods Econ, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[5] Agencia Salut Publ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Inst Catala Oncol, Canc Prevent & Control Program, Tobacco Control Unit, Lhospitalet De Llobregat, Spain
[7] Inst Invest Biomed Bellvitge IDIBELL, Canc Control & Prevent Grp, Lhospitalet De Llobregat, Spain
[8] Univ Barcelona, Dept Clin Sci, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ntr/ntu346
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The potential of smoke-free bans to negatively impact the hospitality business has been an argument of the hospitality and tobacco industry against such legislation. A partial smoke-free legislation was introduced in Spain in 2006 allowing smoking in most bars and restaurants due to the pressure of the hospitality sector. However, this partial ban was later amended in 2011 to include all the hospitality premises without exceptions. The stepped Spanish process permits to evaluate whether the entry into force of the smoke-free legislation had any effect on the economic activity of the hospitality sector. Methods: We employed a pooled time series cross-sectional design, with national data over 6 years (2006-2011). The dependent variable used was the total number of bars and restaurants per 100,000 inhabitants. The explanatory variables used were the average amount of spending per household in bars and restaurants, and the total unemployment rate in Spain by regions. Results: For every 1% increase in the unemployment rate there was a 0.05% decrease in the number of bars and restaurants. In 2007, the number of bars and restaurants was significantly reduced by 13.06% (all others factors being held constant), 4.87% in 2008, and 10.42% in 2009. No statistically significant effect of the smoke-free legislation emerged from 2010 (6.76%) to 2011 (7.69%). Conclusion: The new Spanish smoke-free legislation had no effect on the number of bars and restaurants.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1400
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long term compliance with California's Smoke-Free Workplace law among bars and restaurants in Los Angeles County
    Weber, MD
    Bagwell, DAS
    Fielding, JE
    Glantz, SA
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2003, 12 (03) : 269 - 273
  • [22] Post-ban self-reports on economic impact of smoke-free bars and restaurants are biased by pre-ban attitudes. A longitudinal study among employees
    Lund, Ingeborg
    Lund, Karl Erik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 39 (07) : 776 - 779
  • [23] Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey
    Borland, R.
    Yong, H-H
    Siahpush, M.
    Hyland, A.
    Campbell, S.
    Hastings, G.
    Cummings, K. M.
    Fong, G. T.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2006, 15 : 34 - 41
  • [24] Impact of local tobacco control policies on the prevalence of smoke-free sports clubs
    Garritsen, Heike H.
    Rozema, Andrea D.
    Smit, Rixt A.
    van de Goor, Ien AM.
    van Dooremaal, Mara
    Baars, Jessica
    Kunst, Anton E.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 237 : 270 - 275
  • [25] The economic impact of a smoke-free bylaw on restaurant and bar sales in Ottawa, Canada
    Luk, R
    Ferrence, R
    Gmel, G
    ADDICTION, 2006, 101 (05) : 738 - 745
  • [26] Passengers views on smoke-free provisions of Tobacco Control Law in trains and rail stations
    Saleh, Sazia Binte
    Faruque, Golam Mohiuddin
    Billah, Md. Masum
    Rahman, Md. Atiqur
    Shajib, Samiul Hassan
    Akhter, Ayesha
    Abu Rayhan, Md.
    Sujon, Aminul Islam
    Reza, Md. Farhadur
    Munna, Kamrunnisa
    TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2021, 19 : 47 - 47
  • [27] Economic effects of Ohio's smoke-free law on Kentucky and Ohio border counties
    Pyles, Mark K.
    Hahn, Ellen J.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2011, 20 (01) : 73 - 76
  • [28] The short-term impact of national smoke-free workplace legislation on passive smoking and tobacco use
    Heloma, A
    Jaakkola, MS
    Kähkönen, E
    Reijula, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (09) : 1416 - 1418
  • [29] The influence of newspaper coverage and a media campaign on smokers' support for smoke-free bars and restaurants and on secondhand smoke harm awareness: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey
    Nagelhout, Gera E.
    van den Putte, Bas
    de Vries, Hein
    Crone, Matty
    Fong, Geoffrey T.
    Willemsen, Marc C.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2012, 21 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [30] Impact of the new smoke-free legislation (law 42/2010) on levels of second-hand smoke in hospitality venues
    Cordoba, Rodrigo
    Nerin, Isabel
    Galindo, Virginia
    Alayetod, Carmen
    Victoria Villaverde-Royo, Ma
    Sanz, Concepcion
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2013, 27 (02) : 161 - 163