Band Reporting Probabilities of Mallards, American Black Ducks, and Wood Ducks in Eastern North America

被引:13
|
作者
Garrettson, Pamela R. [1 ]
Raftovich, Robert V. [1 ]
Hines, James E. [2 ]
Zimmerman, Guthrie S. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Div Migratory Bird Management, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Biol Resource Div, Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[3] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Div Migratory Bird Management, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2014年 / 78卷 / 01期
关键词
Aix sponsa; Anas platyrhynchos; Anas rubripes; band reporting probability; black duck; harvest rate; mallard; reward banding; wood duck; REWARD BAND; RATES; REGULATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.647
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Estimates of band reporting probabilities are used for managing North American waterfowl to convert band recovery probabilities into harvest probabilities, which are used to set harvest regulations. Band reporting probability is the probability that someone who has shot and retrieved a banded bird will report the band. This probability can vary relative to a number of factors, particularly the inscription on the band and the ease with which it can be reported. Other factors, such as geographic reporting region, and species and sex of the bird may also play a role. We tested whether reporting probabilities of wood ducks (Aix sponsa) and American black ducks (black ducks; Anas rubripes) differed from those of mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and whether band reporting varied geographically or by the sex of the banded bird. In the analysis of spatially comparable wood duck and mallard data, a band reporting probability of 0.73 (95% CI=0.67-0.78) was appropriate for use across species, sex, and reporting region within the United States. In the black duck-mallard comparison, the band reporting probability of black ducks in Eastern Canada (0.50, 95% CI=0.44-0.57) was lower than in the Eastern United States (0.73, 95% CI=0.62-0.83). These estimates reflected an increase in overall band reporting probability following the addition of a toll-free telephone number to band inscriptions. Lower reporting in Eastern Canada may be because of cultural, linguistic, or logistical barriers. (c) 2013 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 57
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative productivity of American Black Ducks and Mallards nesting in agricultural landscapes of southern Quebec
    Maisonneuve, C
    Mc Nicoll, R
    Desrosiers, A
    WATERBIRDS, 2000, 23 (03): : 378 - 387
  • [32] Outcome of aggressive interactions between American black ducks and mallards during the breeding season
    McAuley, DG
    Clugston, DA
    Longcore, JR
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1998, 62 (01): : 134 - 141
  • [33] Habitat use by sympatric female mallards and American black ducks breeding in a forested environment
    Dwyer, C.P.
    Baldassarre, G.A.
    NCASI Technical Bulletin, 1999, (781 I):
  • [34] HABITAT USE BY SYMPATRIC FEMALE MALLARDS AND AMERICAN BLACK DUCKS BREEDING IN A FORESTED ENVIRONMENT
    DWYER, CP
    BALDASSARRE, GA
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1994, 72 (09) : 1538 - 1542
  • [35] BODY-WEIGHT AND LIPID RESERVES OF AMERICAN BLACK DUCKS AND MALLARDS DURING AUTUMN
    HANSON, AR
    ANKNEY, CD
    DENNIS, DG
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1990, 68 (10): : 2098 - 2104
  • [37] Ducks, Geese, and Swans of North America
    Ringelman, Kevin M.
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 2015, 86 (01)
  • [38] Foraging habits of mallards and wood ducks in a bottomland hardwood forest in Texas
    Miller, LC
    Whiting, RM
    Fountain, MS
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES, 2003, : 160 - 171
  • [39] BILL MORPHOLOGY IN AMERICAN BLACK DUCKS, ANAS-RUBRIPES, AND MALLARDS, ANAS-PLATYRHYNCHOS
    BELANGER, L
    TREMBLAY, S
    COUTURE, R
    CANADIAN FIELD-NATURALIST, 1988, 102 (04): : 720 - 722
  • [40] MIDWINTER FOOD USE AND BODY WEIGHTS OF MALLARDS AND WOOD DUCKS IN MISSISSIPPI
    DELNICKI, D
    REINECKE, KJ
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1986, 50 (01): : 43 - 51