Effect of levocetirizine on nasal provocation testing with adenosine monophosphate compared with allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis

被引:4
|
作者
Vaidyanathan, S. [1 ]
Nair, A. [1 ]
Barnes, M. L. [1 ]
Meldrum, K. [1 ]
Lipworth, B. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Med & Therapeut, Asthma & Allergy Res Grp, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY | 2009年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词
adenosine monophosphate; allergic rhinitis; levocetirizine; nasal allergen challenge; nasal provocation testing; peak nasal inspiratory flow; CALCULATING CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; CORTICOSTEROID RESPONSE; ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY; STATISTICS NOTES; AIR-FLOW; HISTAMINE; DESLORATADINE; FEXOFENADINE; RHINOMANOMETRY; INFLAMMATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03166.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
End-organ hyperreactivity is an important feature of the allergic airway. There are no data directly comparing the responsiveness to treatment of different nasal provocation tests (NPT). We compared the effect of levocetirizine on nasal adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) with specific allergen challenge in patients with intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis (AR). Patients with AR were randomized in double-blind cross-over fashion to receive single doses of levocetirizine 5 mg or identical placebo, with nasal challenge performed 12 h after dosing. Sixteen participants completed per protocol. Nasal AMP or allergen challenge was conducted on separate days with 1- and 2-week washout periods in between, respectively. Measurements of peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were made over 60 min after each challenge. The primary end-point was the provocative concentration of AMP or allergen causing a 20% drop in the PNIF (PC20). The time-profile for PNIF recovery [area under the 60 min time-response curve as % PNIF change (min)] were significantly attenuated for AMP challenge, as mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 11.57 (3.87, 19.25), P=0.005 and for allergen challenge: 17.82 (0.11, 35.53), P=0.04. A highly significant correlation was shown between methods for the area under the curve: (R=0.86, P < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation was also seen for the PC20: (R=0.94, P < 0.001). PC20 improvement amounted to a 1.26 (95% CI 0.16, 2.35) and 0.16 (95% CI -0.41, 0.73) doubling-dilution shifts for allergen and AMP challenges, respectively. Bland-Altman plots confirmed good agreement between methods. A high correlation and statistical agreement has been demonstrated between AMP and allergen challenge for all outcome measures. In particular, the recovery profile after NPT is a sensitive and discriminatory measure of anti-allergic treatment. Cite this as: S. Vaidyanathan, A. Nair, M. L. Barnes, K. Meldrum and B. J. Lipworth, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 2009 (39) 409-416.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 416
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nasal allergen provocation test with multiple aeroallergens detects polysensitization in local allergic rhinitis
    Rondon, Carmen
    Campo, Paloma
    Herrera, Rocio
    Blanca-Lopez, Natalia
    Melendez, Lidia
    Canto, Gabriela
    Torres, Maria J.
    Blanca, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 128 (06) : 1192 - 1197
  • [22] Mast cell alteration in the nasal mucosa following allergen provocation in allergic rhinitis patients
    Kleinjan, A
    Fokkens, WJ
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2001, 31 (07): : 1147 - 1147
  • [23] Antigen presenting cells in the nasal mucosa of patients with allergic rhinitis during allergen provocation
    Godthelp, T
    Fokkens, WJ
    Kleinjan, A
    Holm, AF
    Mulder, PGH
    Prens, EP
    Rijntes, E
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1996, 26 (06): : 677 - 688
  • [24] Human nasal allergen provocation for determination of true allergic rhinitis: methods for clinicians.
    Litvyakova L.I.
    Baraniuk J.N.
    Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, 2002, 2 (3) : 194 - 202
  • [25] The role of the nasal allergen provocation test in local allergic rhinitis cases: a preliminary report
    Krzych-Falta, Edyta
    Furmanczyk, Konrad
    Dziewa-Dawidczyk, Diana
    Wojas, Oksana
    Reklewska, Katarzyna
    Samolinski, Boleslaw K.
    POSTEPY DERMATOLOGII I ALERGOLOGII, 2020, 37 (06): : 890 - 897
  • [26] NASAL ALLERGEN-PROVOCATION TESTING: A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL IN THE INVESTIGATION OF CHRONIC RHINITIS
    Hoek, Werner
    CURRENT ALLERGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 35 (04) : 208 - 212
  • [27] Histamine release upon adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP) nasal provocation in allergic subjects
    Polosa, R
    Pagano, C
    Prosperini, G
    Low, JL
    Dokic, D
    Church, MK
    Crimi, N
    THORAX, 1999, 54 (03) : 230 - 233
  • [28] Effect of nasal allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis on mitochondrial function of peripheral blood mononuclear cells
    Qi, Shanshan
    Barnig, Cindy
    Charles, Anne-Laure
    Poirot, Anh
    Meyer, Alain
    Clere-Jehl, Raphael
    de Blay, Frederic
    Geny, Bernard
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 118 (03) : 367 - 369
  • [29] IMMUNOPATHOLOGY OF ALLERGIC RHINITIS - NASAL PROVOCATION TESTS
    GIRARD, JP
    HORVAT, L
    HEIMLICH, EM
    REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE ET D IMMUNOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 1974, 14 (04): : 175 - 179
  • [30] NASAL PROVOCATION AS A DIAGNOSTIC AID IN ALLERGIC RHINITIS
    COLLINSW.C
    CHIU, AW
    LAMENZA, C
    NIZAMI, R
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY, 1972, 30 (04): : 226 - &