Effect of levocetirizine on nasal provocation testing with adenosine monophosphate compared with allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis

被引:4
|
作者
Vaidyanathan, S. [1 ]
Nair, A. [1 ]
Barnes, M. L. [1 ]
Meldrum, K. [1 ]
Lipworth, B. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Med & Therapeut, Asthma & Allergy Res Grp, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY | 2009年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词
adenosine monophosphate; allergic rhinitis; levocetirizine; nasal allergen challenge; nasal provocation testing; peak nasal inspiratory flow; CALCULATING CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; CORTICOSTEROID RESPONSE; ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY; STATISTICS NOTES; AIR-FLOW; HISTAMINE; DESLORATADINE; FEXOFENADINE; RHINOMANOMETRY; INFLAMMATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03166.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
End-organ hyperreactivity is an important feature of the allergic airway. There are no data directly comparing the responsiveness to treatment of different nasal provocation tests (NPT). We compared the effect of levocetirizine on nasal adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) with specific allergen challenge in patients with intermittent and persistent allergic rhinitis (AR). Patients with AR were randomized in double-blind cross-over fashion to receive single doses of levocetirizine 5 mg or identical placebo, with nasal challenge performed 12 h after dosing. Sixteen participants completed per protocol. Nasal AMP or allergen challenge was conducted on separate days with 1- and 2-week washout periods in between, respectively. Measurements of peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were made over 60 min after each challenge. The primary end-point was the provocative concentration of AMP or allergen causing a 20% drop in the PNIF (PC20). The time-profile for PNIF recovery [area under the 60 min time-response curve as % PNIF change (min)] were significantly attenuated for AMP challenge, as mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 11.57 (3.87, 19.25), P=0.005 and for allergen challenge: 17.82 (0.11, 35.53), P=0.04. A highly significant correlation was shown between methods for the area under the curve: (R=0.86, P < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation was also seen for the PC20: (R=0.94, P < 0.001). PC20 improvement amounted to a 1.26 (95% CI 0.16, 2.35) and 0.16 (95% CI -0.41, 0.73) doubling-dilution shifts for allergen and AMP challenges, respectively. Bland-Altman plots confirmed good agreement between methods. A high correlation and statistical agreement has been demonstrated between AMP and allergen challenge for all outcome measures. In particular, the recovery profile after NPT is a sensitive and discriminatory measure of anti-allergic treatment. Cite this as: S. Vaidyanathan, A. Nair, M. L. Barnes, K. Meldrum and B. J. Lipworth, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 2009 (39) 409-416.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 416
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative effects of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine on nasal adenosine monophosphate challenge in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis
    Lee, DKC
    Gardiner, M
    Haggart, K
    Fujihara, S
    Lipworth, BJ
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2004, 34 (04): : 650 - 653
  • [2] Effects of intranasal corticosteroid on nasal adenosine monophosphate challenge in persistent allergic rhinitis
    Barnes, M. L.
    Biallosterski, B. T.
    Fujihara, S.
    Gray, R. D.
    Fardon, T. C.
    Lipworth, B. J.
    ALLERGY, 2006, 61 (11) : 1319 - 1325
  • [3] LOCAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS: NASAL ALLERGEN PROVOCATION TESTING AS A GOOD TOOL IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
    Wojas, Oksana
    Samolinski, Boleslaw
    Krzych-Falta, Edyta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2020, 33 (02) : 241 - 246
  • [4] Laryngeal effects of nasal allergen provocation in singers with allergic rhinitis
    Verguts, Monique M. L.
    Eggermont, Anita
    Decoster, Wivine
    de Jong, Felix I. C. R. S.
    Hellings, Peter W.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2011, 268 (03) : 419 - 427
  • [5] Laryngeal effects of nasal allergen provocation in singers with allergic rhinitis
    Monique M. L. Verguts
    Anita Eggermont
    Wivine Decoster
    Felix I. C. R. S. de Jong
    Peter W. Hellings
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2011, 268 : 419 - 427
  • [6] Effect of nasal allergen challenge on noninvasive markers of inflammation in allergic rhinitis
    Boot, D.
    Kam de, M.
    van Wijk, R. Gerth
    Groot de, H.
    Mascelli, M.
    Das, A.
    Miller, B.
    Hiemstra, P.
    Veselic-Charvat, M.
    Cohen, A.
    Diamant, Z.
    ALLERGY, 2007, 62 : 486 - 486
  • [7] Nasal conditioning in perennial allergic rhinitis after nasal allergen challenge
    Rozsasi, A
    Leiacker, R
    Keck, T
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2004, 34 (07): : 1099 - 1104
  • [8] Diagnostic value of nasal provocation testing and rhinomanometry in allergic rhinitis
    Fernandes, FR
    Sole, D
    Naspitz, C
    MunozLopez, F
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 6 (03): : 184 - 188
  • [9] Reproducibility of nasal allergen challenge responses in adults with allergic rhinitis
    Pantin, Charles T.
    Southworth, Thomas
    Wetzel, Kristiane
    Singh, Dave
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY-ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 11 : 67 - 76
  • [10] Frequency of local allergic rhinitis diagnosed by high dose nasal allergen provocation
    Wagenmann, M.
    Sternal, F.
    Stenin, I
    Plettenberg, C.
    Bruesseler, M.
    Scheckenbach, K.
    ALLERGY, 2017, 72 : 23 - 23