Evaluation of a youth agency's supervision practices: A mixed-method approach

被引:4
|
作者
Gosselin, Julie [1 ]
Valiquette-Tessier, Sophie-Claire [1 ]
Vandette, Marie-Pier [1 ]
Romano, Elisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Psychol, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
关键词
Youth agency; Evaluation; Supervision; Organizational development; CLINICAL SUPERVISION; PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY; COMPETENCE; OUTCOMES; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.03.010
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This research presents the findings from an evaluation and organizational development initiative that was requested by a Canadian youth agency working in a large urban setting. A team of four researchers affiliated with the Center for Research on Educational and Community Services (CRECS) at the University of Ottawa conducted the evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation was to identify the supervision needs and challenges of coordinators and front line staff, assess the efficiency of the current supervision practices, and evaluate the supervisors' and supervisees' satisfaction with these current practices. A literature review was performed to help provide a clear definition of 'supervision' and the different professional roles it encompasses. Additionally, research evidence pertaining both to what contributes to supervision efficacy and supervisor competency was reviewed to distill the most robust findings in the existing literature. The lines of evidence consisted of a document and file review, an online employee survey, group discussions (i.e. focus groups), and interviews with key informants. The results of the evaluation helped the research team formulate recommendations to the agency for the development of enhanced supervision practices across its various service areas. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 60
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Street Doctors Northern Ireland: A mixed-method process and impact evaluation of a youth violence reduction intervention
    Walsh, Colm
    Roche, Emma
    Gill, Kylie
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2023, 100
  • [22] Evaluation of healthy indoor acoustic environments in residential buildings by the occupants: A mixed-method approach
    Chen, Kai
    Kang, Jian
    Ma, Hui
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 246
  • [23] Evaluation of primary health care system in Yangon Region, Myanmar: a mixed-method approach
    Moon, J.
    Kang, S. J.
    Noh, J. W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32
  • [24] AN INTERDISCIPLINARY MIXED-METHOD APPROACH TO THE EVALUATION OF A NOVEL WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY IN EASTERN UGANDA
    Burleson, Grace
    MacCarty, Nordica
    Sharp, Kendra
    Tilt, Bryan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 2B, 2018,
  • [25] Mixed-method approach to veteran satisfaction with pain education
    Watson, Erin C.
    Cosio, David
    Lin, Erica H.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 51 (03): : 503 - 514
  • [26] Conceptualizing masstige buying behavior: A mixed-method approach
    Purohit, Sonal
    Radia, Karan Nilesh
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 142 : 886 - 898
  • [27] Evaluating the Senior Companion Program: A Mixed-Method Approach
    Butler, Sandra S.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIAL WORK, 2006, 47 (1-2): : 45 - 70
  • [28] Understanding Place Through Use of Mixed-Method Approach
    Deutsch, Kathleen
    Goulias, Konstadinos G.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2323) : 1 - 9
  • [29] Psychological comfort in service relationships: A mixed-method approach
    Radia, Karan Nilesh
    Purohit, Sonal
    Desai, Shachi
    Nenavani, Jitendra
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2022, 64
  • [30] Fatherhood Education with Latino Fathers: A Mixed-Method Evaluation
    Turner, Joshua J.
    Stapley, Sarah
    Bradford, Kay
    Higginbotham, Brian J.
    JOURNAL OF LATINOS AND EDUCATION, 2023, 22 (02) : 842 - 854