Comparative transcriptomics reveals similarities and differences between astrocytoma grades

被引:32
|
作者
Seifert, Michael [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Garbe, Martin [1 ]
Friedrich, Betty [1 ,3 ]
Mittelbronn, Michel [4 ]
Klink, Barbara [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Ctr Informat Serv & High Performance Comp, Innovat Methods Comp, Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, CECAD, Cellular Networks & Syst Biol, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[3] Inst Mol Syst Biol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Edinger Inst, Inst Neurol, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med Carl Gustav Carus, Inst Clin Genet, Dresden, Germany
[6] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Dresden, Germany
[7] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Astrocytoma grades; Pilocytic astrocytoma; Diffuse astrocytoma; Anaplastic astrocytoma; Glioblastoma; INTEGRATED GENOMIC ANALYSIS; PHOSPHOGLYCERATE KINASE 1; GROWTH-FACTOR EXPRESSION; HUMAN GLIOMA; PILOCYTIC ASTROCYTOMAS; HUMAN GLIOBLASTOMA; MALIGNANT GLIOMAS; DIFFUSE ASTROCYTOMAS; GENETIC ALTERATIONS; CX3CR1/CX3CL1; AXIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-015-1939-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Astrocytomas are the most common primary brain tumors distinguished into four histological grades. Molecular analyses of individual astrocytoma grades have revealed detailed insights into genetic, transcriptomic and epigenetic alterations. This provides an excellent basis to identify similarities and differences between astrocytoma grades. Methods: We utilized public omics data of all four astrocytoma grades focusing on pilocytic astrocytomas (PA I), diffuse astrocytomas (AS II), anaplastic astrocytomas (AS III) and glioblastomas (GBM IV) to identify similarities and differences using well-established bioinformatics and systems biology approaches. We further validated the expression and localization of Ang2 involved in angiogenesis using immunohistochemistry. Results: Our analyses show similarities and differences between astrocytoma grades at the level of individual genes, signaling pathways and regulatory networks. We identified many differentially expressed genes that were either exclusively observed in a specific astrocytoma grade or commonly affected in specific subsets of astrocytoma grades in comparison to normal brain. Further, the number of differentially expressed genes generally increased with the astrocytoma grade with one major exception. The cytokine receptor pathway showed nearly the same number of differentially expressed genes in PA I and GBM IV and was further characterized by a significant overlap of commonly altered genes and an exclusive enrichment of overexpressed cancer genes in GBM IV. Additional analyses revealed a strong exclusive overexpression of CX3CL1 (fractalkine) and its receptor CX3CR1 in PA I possibly contributing to the absence of invasive growth. We further found that PA I was significantly associated with the mesenchymal subtype typically observed for very aggressive GBM IV. Expression of endothelial and mesenchymal markers (ANGPT2, CHI3L1) indicated a stronger contribution of the micro-environment to the manifestation of the mesenchymal subtype than the tumor biology itself. We further inferred a transcriptional regulatory network associated with specific expression differences distinguishing PA I from AS II, AS III and GBM IV. Major central transcriptional regulators were involved in brain development, cell cycle control, proliferation, apoptosis, chromatin remodeling or DNA methylation. Many of these regulators showed directly underlying DNA methylation changes in PA I or gene copy number mutations in AS II, AS III and GBM IV. Conclusions: This computational study characterizes similarities and differences between all four astrocytoma grades confirming known and revealing novel insights into astrocytoma biology. Our findings represent a valuable resource for future computational and experimental studies.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ageing transcriptome meta-analysis reveals similarities and differences between key mammalian tissues
    Palmer, Daniel
    Fabris, Fabio
    Doherty, Aoife
    Freitas, Alex A.
    de Magalhaes, Joao Pedro
    AGING-US, 2021, 13 (03): : 3313 - 3341
  • [32] Erratum: Comparative transcriptomics reveals key differences in the response to milk oligosaccharides of infant gut-associated bifidobacteria
    Daniel Garrido
    Santiago Ruiz-Moyano
    Danielle G. Lemay
    David A. Sela
    J. Bruce German
    David A. Mills
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [33] Similarities and differences between soaps and complements
    von Koranyi, A
    BIOCHEMISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1908, 11 : 82 - 88
  • [34] Similarities and differences between design and artwork
    Despot, Katerina
    Sandeva, Vaska
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL LEARNING, ICVL 2017, 2017, : 198 - 203
  • [35] Bullying and cyberbullying: between similarities and differences
    D'Angio, G.
    CLINICA TERAPEUTICA, 2020, 171 (03): : 207 - 209
  • [36] Differences and Similarities between Whitman and Dickinson
    王芃淇
    海外英语, 2018, (09) : 179 - 180
  • [37] Similarities and Differences Between HFmrEF and HFpEF
    Li, Peixin
    Zhao, Hengli
    Zhang, Jianyu
    Ning, Yunshan
    Tu, Yan
    Xu, Dingli
    Zeng, Qingchun
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [38] Similarities and differences between physics and economics
    Stanley, HE
    Amaral, LAN
    Gabaix, X
    Gopikrishnan, P
    Plerou, V
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2001, 299 (1-2) : 1 - 15
  • [40] SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CLUTTERING AND STUTTERING
    WEISS, DA
    FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1967, 19 (02): : 98 - 104