Habitat selection in two Australasian treecreepers: what cues should they use?

被引:24
|
作者
Doerr, VAJ
Doerr, ED
Jenkins, SH
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Bot & Zool, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Univ Nevada, Program Ecol Evolut & Conservat Biol, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1071/MU05020
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
When habitats differ in quality, individuals may attempt to maximise fitness through habitat selection. However, complete tests of habitat selection are rare, in part because many studies fail to quantify fitness consequences of habitat choice. We studied habitat selection of Australasian treecreepers (Passeriformes: Climacteridae) in temperate eucalypt woodland by examining the influence of habitat characteristics and confounding factors on annual reproductive success. In the pair-breeding White-throated Treecreeper (Cormobates leucophaeus), older females and territories with fewer stumps and less woody debris produced more young, possibly because these habitat characteristics lead to reduced conflict with Brown Treecreepers (Climacteris picumnus). In the cooperatively breeding Brown Treecreeper, larger groups and territories with lower densities of shrub, moderate levels of ground cover, and greater amounts of foraging substrate produced more fledglings, whereas territories with greater invertebrate biomass produced more independent young. Predicted annual reproductive success in the best territory was up to two offspring more than predicted success in the worst territory; thus, treecreepers would benefit from selecting good quality habitat. However, complete tests of habitat selection need to evaluate whether dispersers actively sample multiple habitats and choose the best available, and thus whether individual-level processes determine large-scale patterns of distribution and abundance. These results also suggest that current conservation efforts to exclude grazing from remnant patches of eucalypt woodland may be inappropriate if not used in conjunction with other management actions, because such exclusion may dramatically increase shrub density and ground cover. Alternative management tools need to be investigated that will maintain a mosaic of microhabitat types and thus protect the eucalypt woodland ecosystem, not just a few of its species.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 103
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What liner should I use?
    Verplancke, Koen
    Liners, Kemiart
    International Paper Board Industry, 2010, 53 (05): : 30 - 31
  • [32] Habitat selection and shelter use by Octopus tetricus
    Anderson, TJ
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1997, 150 (1-3) : 137 - 148
  • [33] Effects of habitat permanence cues on larval abundance of two mosquito species
    Mokany, A
    Mokany, K
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2006, 563 (1) : 269 - 276
  • [34] Effects of Habitat Permanence Cues on Larval Abundance of Two Mosquito Species
    Allie Mokany
    Karel Mokany
    Hydrobiologia, 2006, 563
  • [35] Habitat use by female western roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): influence of resource availability on habitat selection in two contrasting years
    Pellerin, M.
    Calenge, C.
    Said, S.
    Gaillard, J. -M.
    Fritz, H.
    Duncan, P.
    Van Laere, G.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2010, 88 (11) : 1052 - 1062
  • [36] Predator cues alter habitat use by the amphipod Hyalella azteca (Saussure)
    Camacho, Frank A.
    Thacker, Robert W.
    FRESHWATER SCIENCE, 2013, 32 (04) : 1148 - 1154
  • [37] Supporting hemodynamics: what should we target? What treatments should we use?
    Gattinoni, Luciano
    Carlesso, Eleonora
    CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17
  • [38] SPC - WHAT DATA SHOULD I COLLECT - WHAT CHARTS SHOULD I USE
    MUNOZ, J
    NIELSEN, C
    QUALITY PROGRESS, 1991, 24 (01) : 50 - 52
  • [39] Supporting hemodynamics: what should we target? What treatments should we use?
    Luciano Gattinoni
    Eleonora Carlesso
    Critical Care, 17
  • [40] Breeders and floaters use different habitat cover: should habitat use be a social status-dependent strategy?
    Letizia Campioni
    Rui Lourenço
    María del Mar Delgado
    Vincenzo Penteriani
    Journal of Ornithology, 2012, 153 : 1215 - 1223