Inexact convex relaxations for AC optimal power flow: Towards AC feasibility

被引:26
|
作者
Venzke, Andreas [1 ]
Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros [1 ]
Molzahn, Daniel K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Elect Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Atlanta, GA 30313 USA
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Div Energy Syst, 9700 S Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
关键词
Convex quadratic optimization; Optimal power flow; Nonlinear programming; Semidefinite programming; INTERIOR-POINT METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106480
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Convex relaxations of AC optimal power flow (AC-OPF) problems have attracted significant interest as in several instances they provably yield the global optimum to the original non-convex problem. If, however, the relaxation is inexact, the obtained solution is not AC-feasible. The quality of the obtained solution is essential for several practical applications of AC-OPF, but detailed analyses are lacking in existing literature. This paper aims to cover this gap. We provide an in-depth investigation of the solution characteristics when convex relaxations are inexact, we assess the most promising AC feasibility recovery methods for large-scale systems, and we propose two new metrics that lead to a better understanding of the quality of the identified solutions. We perform a comprehensive assessment on 96 different test cases, ranging from 14 to 3120 buses, and we show the following: (i) Despite an optimality gap of less than 1%, several test cases still exhibit substantial distances to both AC feasibility and local optimality and the newly proposed metrics characterize these deviations. (ii) Penalization methods fail to recover an AC-feasible solution in 15 out of 45 test cases. (iii) The computational benefits of warm-starting non-convex solvers have significant variation, but a computational speedup exists in over 75% of cases.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fully Decentralized AC Optimal Power Flow Algorithms
    Sun, Andy X.
    Phan, Dzung T.
    Ghosh, Soumyadip
    [J]. 2013 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PES), 2013,
  • [42] Stochastic AC Optimal Power Flow with Affine Recourse
    Louca, Raphael
    Bitar, Eilyan
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 55TH CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2016, : 2431 - 2436
  • [43] Representing ZIP loads in convex relaxations of optimal power flow problems
    Shen, Zhangliang
    Wei, Zhinong
    Sun, Guoqiang
    Chen, Sheng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2019, 110 : 372 - 385
  • [44] Distributed AC Optimal Power Flow using ALADIN
    Engelmann, Alexander
    Muhlpfordt, Tillmann
    Jiang, Yuning
    Houska, Boris
    Faulwasser, Timm
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 5536 - 5541
  • [45] An Exact SOCP Formulation for AC Optimal Power Flow
    Yasasvi, P. Naga
    Chandra, Snehil
    Mohapatra, A.
    Srivastava, S. C.
    [J]. 2018 20TH NATIONAL POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (NPSC), 2018,
  • [46] Coordinated Transmission and Distribution AC Optimal Power Flow
    Li, Zhengshuo
    Guo, Qinglai
    Sun, Hongbin
    Wang, Jianhui
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2018, 9 (02) : 1228 - 1240
  • [47] Optimal Adaptive Linearizations of the AC Power Flow Equations
    Misra, Sidhant
    Molzahn, Daniel K.
    Dvijotham, Krishnamurthy
    [J]. 2018 POWER SYSTEMS COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (PSCC), 2018,
  • [48] Optimal Power Flow for a Hybrid AC/DC Microgrid
    Qachchachi, Nabil
    Mahmoudi, Hassane
    El Hasnaoui, Abdennebi
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE (IRSEC), 2014, : 559 - 564
  • [49] Failure Probability Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow
    Subramanyam, Anirudh
    Roth, Jacob
    Lam, Albert
    Anitescu, Mihai
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2022, 37 (06) : 4683 - 4695
  • [50] Optimal Power Flow for AC-DC Networks
    Bahrami, Shahab
    Wong, Vincent W. S.
    Jatskevich, Juri
    [J]. 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART GRID COMMUNICATIONS (SMARTGRIDCOMM), 2014, : 49 - 54