Inexact convex relaxations for AC optimal power flow: Towards AC feasibility

被引:26
|
作者
Venzke, Andreas [1 ]
Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros [1 ]
Molzahn, Daniel K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Elect Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Atlanta, GA 30313 USA
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Div Energy Syst, 9700 S Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
关键词
Convex quadratic optimization; Optimal power flow; Nonlinear programming; Semidefinite programming; INTERIOR-POINT METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106480
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Convex relaxations of AC optimal power flow (AC-OPF) problems have attracted significant interest as in several instances they provably yield the global optimum to the original non-convex problem. If, however, the relaxation is inexact, the obtained solution is not AC-feasible. The quality of the obtained solution is essential for several practical applications of AC-OPF, but detailed analyses are lacking in existing literature. This paper aims to cover this gap. We provide an in-depth investigation of the solution characteristics when convex relaxations are inexact, we assess the most promising AC feasibility recovery methods for large-scale systems, and we propose two new metrics that lead to a better understanding of the quality of the identified solutions. We perform a comprehensive assessment on 96 different test cases, ranging from 14 to 3120 buses, and we show the following: (i) Despite an optimality gap of less than 1%, several test cases still exhibit substantial distances to both AC feasibility and local optimality and the newly proposed metrics characterize these deviations. (ii) Penalization methods fail to recover an AC-feasible solution in 15 out of 45 test cases. (iii) The computational benefits of warm-starting non-convex solvers have significant variation, but a computational speedup exists in over 75% of cases.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Convex Relaxations of Chance Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow
    Venzke, Andreas
    Halilbasic, Lejla
    Markovic, Uros
    Hug, Gabriela
    Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (03) : 2829 - 2841
  • [2] Convex Relaxations of Chance Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow
    Venzke, Andreas
    Halilbasic, Lejla
    Markovic, Uros
    Hug, Gabriela
    Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros
    [J]. 2018 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2018,
  • [3] Convex Relaxations of Probabilistic AC Optimal Power Flow for Interconnected AC and HVDC Grids
    Venzke, Andreas
    Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros
    [J]. 2020 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2020,
  • [4] Convex Relaxations of Probabilistic AC Optimal Power Flow for Interconnected AC and HVDC Grids
    Venzke, Andreas
    Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (04) : 2706 - 2718
  • [5] Efficient Bound Tightening Techniques for Convex Relaxations of AC Optimal Power Flow
    Shchetinin, Dinitry
    De Rubira, Tomas Tinoco
    Hug, Gabriela
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (05) : 3848 - 3857
  • [6] Convex Relaxations of Security Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow under Uncertainty
    Venzke, Andreas
    Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros
    [J]. 2018 POWER SYSTEMS COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (PSCC), 2018,
  • [7] Towards an AC Optimal Power Flow Algorithm with Robust Feasibility Guarantees
    Molzahn, Daniel K.
    Roald, Line A.
    [J]. 2018 POWER SYSTEMS COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (PSCC), 2018,
  • [8] Second-order cone AC optimal power flow: convex relaxations and feasible solutions
    Zhao YUAN
    Mohammad Reza HESAMZADEH
    [J]. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2019, 7 (02) : 268 - 280
  • [9] Second-order cone AC optimal power flow: convex relaxations and feasible solutions
    Yuan, Zhao
    Hesamzadeh, Mohammad Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2019, 7 (02) : 268 - 280
  • [10] Convex Relaxations of Probabilistic AC Optimal Power Flow for Interconnected AC and HVDC Grids (vol 34, pg 2706, 2019)
    Venzke, Andreas
    Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2020, 35 (05) : 4143 - 4143