The potential of chemical looping combustion using the gas switching concept to eliminate the energy penalty of CO2 capture

被引:23
|
作者
Arnaiz del Pozo, Carlos [2 ]
Cloete, Schalk [1 ]
Cloete, Jan Hendrik [3 ]
Jimenez Alvaro, Angel [2 ]
Amini, Shahriar [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Ind, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Gas switching combustion; CO2; capture; Energy penalty; Efficiency; Integrated gasification combined cycle; AIR SEPARATION UNIT; IGCC POWER-PLANTS; HOT GAS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; ECONOMIC-ASSESSMENT; OXYGEN PRODUCTION; CARBON CAPTURE; BED REACTOR; CLC UNIT; GASIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy penalty is the primary challenge facing CO2 capture and storage (CCS) technology. One possible solution to this challenge is gas switching combustion (GSC): a promising technology for gaseous fuel combustion with integrated CO2 capture at almost no direct energy penalty. However, previous work showed that GSC integrated into an IGCC power plant still imposed an energy penalty of 5.7%-points relative to an unabated IGCC plant. This penalty originates mainly from the maximum temperature limitation of the GSC reactors and inefficient power production from the CO2 -rich stream. Addressing these challenges via an additional combustor after the GSC reactors and improved heat integration successfully eliminated the aforementioned energy penalty, although feeding carbon-containing fuels to the additional combustor reduces the CO2 capture ratio. Furthermore, GSC presents two channels for exceeding the efficiency of an unabated benchmark plant: 1) the high steam partial pressure in the CO2 -rich stream allows most of the steam condensation enthalpy to be recovered and 2) precombustion gas clean-up can potentially be replaced with post-combustion clean-up because pollutants remain concentrated in the CO2 -rich stream. In combination, these effects can boost plant efficiency by a further 2%points, exceeding the efficiency of an unabated IGCC plant. Ultimately, the most efficient plant evaluated in this study achieved 50.9% efficiency with 80.7% CO2 capture. The GSC-IGCC power plant can therefore solve the most fundamental challenge facing CCS and more detailed feasibility studies are strongly recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 281
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A brief review for chemical looping combustion as a promising CO2 capture technology: Fundamentals and progress
    Abuelgasim, Siddig
    Wang, Wenju
    Abdalazeez, Atif
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 764
  • [32] Energy and exergy analysis of chemical looping combustion technology and comparison with pre-combustion and oxy-fuel combustion technologies for CO2 capture
    Mukherjee, Sanjay
    Kumar, Prashant
    Yang, Aidong
    Fennell, Paul
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 3 (03): : 2104 - 2114
  • [33] Performance Model for Evaluating Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC) Processes for CO2 Capture at Gas-Fired Power Plants
    Mantripragada, Hari C.
    Rubin, Edward S.
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (03) : 2257 - 2267
  • [34] Analysis of Combined Cycle Power Plants with Chemical Looping Reforming of Natural Gas and Pre-Combustion CO2 Capture
    Nazir, Shareq Mohd
    Bolland, Olav
    Amini, Shahriar
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (01):
  • [35] Energy penalty estimates for CO2 capture: Comparison between fuel types and capture-combustion modes
    Vasudevan, Suraj
    Farooq, Shamsuzzaman
    Karimi, Iftekhar A.
    Saeys, Mark
    Quah, Michael C. G.
    Agrawal, Rakesh
    ENERGY, 2016, 103 : 709 - 714
  • [36] Avoiding CO2 capture effort and cost for negative CO2 emissions using industrial waste in chemical-looping combustion/gasification of biomass
    Patrick Moldenhauer
    Carl Linderholm
    Magnus Rydén
    Anders Lyngfelt
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2020, 25 : 1 - 24
  • [37] Avoiding CO2 capture effort and cost for negative CO2 emissions using industrial waste in chemical-looping combustion/gasification of biomass
    Moldenhauer, Patrick
    Linderholm, Carl
    Ryden, Magnus
    Lyngfelt, Anders
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2020, 25 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [38] Heat management in Gas Switching Combustion for power production with integrated CO2 capture
    Cloete, Schalk
    Zaabout, Abdelghafour
    Romano, Matteo C.
    Chiesa, Paolo
    Lozza, Giovanni
    Gallucci, Fausto
    Annaland, Martin van Sint
    Amini, Shahriar
    CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 : 2215 - 2220
  • [39] CO2 recovery in a power plant with chemical looping combustion
    Ishida, M.
    Jin, H.
    Energy Conversion and Management, 38 (9999):
  • [40] CO2 recovery in a power plant with chemical looping combustion
    Ishida, M
    Jin, H
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 38 : S187 - S192