To join or not to join?-A framework for the evaluation of enterprise blockchain consortia

被引:3
|
作者
Schwarzer, Max [1 ]
Gurpinar, Tan [1 ]
Henke, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Dortmund Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Chair Enterprise Logist, Dortmund, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2022年 / 5卷
关键词
distributed ledger technology; blockchain; enterprise consortia; supply chain management; technology evaluation model; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2022.935346
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Within the past years, enterprise blockchain solutions were frequently developed within different industry consortia. In most cases, this resulted in isolated solutions competing against each other due to similar approaches and goals. Today, decision makers do not necessarily need to establish entirely new blockchain consortia, as established ones already exist, and participation is a considerable way to avoid unreasonable efforts. In this paper, we apply an iterative literature review to identify different factors relevant for practitioners, who face the challenge of joining an existing enterprise blockchain consortium. In a second step, we discuss these factors utilizing supply chain management as a role model. As a main finding, we propose an evaluation framework for the purpose of enterprise blockchain consortium analysis. Additionally, we provide several questions relevant for practitioners during their evaluation stages. With our evaluation framework we contribute to blockchain research, where - despite its high relevance - the topic of consortium evaluation has so far been neglected. We also contribute to research in the field of technology evaluation by proposing and merging five different evaluation dimensions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Evaluation of Map-Reduce Join Algorithms
    Penar, Maciej
    Wilczek, Artur
    BEYOND DATABASES, ARCHITECTURES AND STRUCTURES, BDAS 2016, 2016, 613 : 192 - 203
  • [32] To Join or Not to Join (A Health Data Collaboration): An Opportunity for Improvement
    Porcaro, Keith
    Pajor, Nathan
    Barnard, John
    Safier, Kristen
    Margolis, Peter
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 243 : 4 - +
  • [33] Join predicate index based join algorithm in ORDB
    Jisuanji Gongcheng/Computer Engineering, 2000, 26 (08): : 98 - 100
  • [34] Structural join and staircase join algorithms of sibling relationship
    Wan, Chang-Xuan
    Liu, Xi-Ping
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 22 (02) : 171 - 181
  • [35] Structural Join and Staircase Join Algorithms of Sibling Relationship
    Chang-Xuan Wan
    Xi-Ping Liu
    Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2007, 22 : 171 - 181
  • [36] Skyline and mapping aware join query evaluation
    Raghavan, Venkatesh
    Rundensteiner, Elke A.
    Srivastava, Shweta
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 36 (06) : 917 - 936
  • [37] A performance evaluation of spatial join processing strategies
    Papadopoulos, A
    Rigaux, P
    Scholl, M
    ADVANCES IN SPATIAL DATABASES, 1999, 1651 : 286 - 307
  • [38] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF AN ASSOCIATIVE PARALLEL JOIN MODULE
    HURSON, AR
    MILLER, LL
    SHIRAZI, B
    PAKZAD, SH
    COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 1989, 4 (03): : 131 - 146
  • [39] 谈谈join,join in,take part in的用法
    王荣
    初中生辅导, 2005, (24) : 31 - 33
  • [40] TT-Join: Efficient Set Containment Join
    Yang, Jianye
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Yang, Shiyu
    Zhang, Ying
    Lin, Xuemin
    2017 IEEE 33RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING (ICDE 2017), 2017, : 509 - 520