To join or not to join?-A framework for the evaluation of enterprise blockchain consortia

被引:3
|
作者
Schwarzer, Max [1 ]
Gurpinar, Tan [1 ]
Henke, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Dortmund Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Chair Enterprise Logist, Dortmund, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2022年 / 5卷
关键词
distributed ledger technology; blockchain; enterprise consortia; supply chain management; technology evaluation model; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2022.935346
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Within the past years, enterprise blockchain solutions were frequently developed within different industry consortia. In most cases, this resulted in isolated solutions competing against each other due to similar approaches and goals. Today, decision makers do not necessarily need to establish entirely new blockchain consortia, as established ones already exist, and participation is a considerable way to avoid unreasonable efforts. In this paper, we apply an iterative literature review to identify different factors relevant for practitioners, who face the challenge of joining an existing enterprise blockchain consortium. In a second step, we discuss these factors utilizing supply chain management as a role model. As a main finding, we propose an evaluation framework for the purpose of enterprise blockchain consortium analysis. Additionally, we provide several questions relevant for practitioners during their evaluation stages. With our evaluation framework we contribute to blockchain research, where - despite its high relevance - the topic of consortium evaluation has so far been neglected. We also contribute to research in the field of technology evaluation by proposing and merging five different evaluation dimensions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enterprise architects join the team
    Parsons, RJ
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2005, 22 (05) : 16 - 17
  • [2] Enterprise integration: join the successful 20%
    Funk, GL
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2001, 80 (04): : 43 - 46
  • [3] TO JOIN OR NOT TO JOIN
    ENSTROM, EA
    ENSTROM, DC
    ELEMENTARY ENGLISH, 1964, 41 (08): : 869 - &
  • [4] To Join or Not to Join
    Wiley, Steven
    SCIENTIST, 2010, 24 (03): : 33 - 33
  • [5] The θ-Join as a Join with θ
    Desharnais, Jules
    Moeller, Bernhard
    RELATIONAL AND ALGEBRAIC METHODS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2020, 12062 : 47 - 64
  • [6] Block Nested Join and Sort Merge Join Algorithms: An Empirical Evaluation
    Chen, Mingxian
    Zhong, Zhi
    ADVANCED DATA MINING AND APPLICATIONS, ADMA 2014, 2014, 8933 : 705 - 715
  • [7] Evaluation of main memory join algorithms for joins with subset join predicates
    Helmer, S
    Moerkotte, G
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VERY LARGE DATABASES, 1997, : 386 - 395
  • [8] Detection of Blockchain Transactions Used in Blockchain Mixer of Coin Join Type
    Maksutov, Artem A.
    Alexeev, Maxim S.
    Fedorova, Natalia O.
    Andreev, Daniil A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE CONFERENCE OF RUSSIAN YOUNG RESEARCHERS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING (EICONRUS), 2019, : 274 - 277
  • [9] Join Reordering by Join Simulation
    Mishra, Chaitanya
    Koudas, Nick
    ICDE: 2009 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 493 - 504
  • [10] Join a Union and Join a DAO
    Alioto, Daisy
    NATION, 2022, 314 (01) : 11 - 11