An investigation on the correlation between the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and joint roughness parameters

被引:33
|
作者
Abolfazli, Milad [1 ]
Fahimifar, Ahmad [2 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Rock Joint; Joint roughness coefficient (JRC); Statistical parameters; Fractal parameter; Correlation; SHEAR-STRENGTH; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; ROCK JOINTS; PROFILES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120415
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Correlation of the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and various parameters for joint roughness evaluation was investigated in this study. A high-resolution 3D laser scanner was employed to precisely record roughness characteristics of 16 tensile fractured rock joints with different sizes. Direct shear tests were then conducted on rock joints and employing Barton's equation, JRC for each joint is back-calculated. Joint profiles were retrieved from the captured 3D joint planes and roughness statistical parameters including Z(2), SDi, R-p, and SF were calculated for each profile at 3 different sampling intervals (0.02 mm, 0.05 mm, and 0.1 mm). It was understood that Z(2) and SF had the strongest correlation with JRC. Several equations were proposed for estimation of JRC using statistical parameters most of which yielded similar results to previous related research. Based on the findings of this study, all statistical parameters except SF experience a devaluation when sampling interval increases while SF value increases somewhat drastically with a raise in sampling interval. It was concluded that the sampling interval has a significant impact on all studied parameters and must be carefully chosen so further errors can be avoided. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A New Statistical Parameter for Determining Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) considering the Shear Direction and Contribution of Different Protrusions
    Huan, Jiu-yang
    Zhang, Zhi-qiang
    He, Ming-ming
    Li, Ning
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [32] A Novel Discontinuity Roughness Parameter and Its Correlation with Joint Roughness Coefficients
    Zhang, Huizhen
    Zhang, Changsuo
    Yang, Zejin
    Li, Zhiqiang
    Wang, Chenlong
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (22)
  • [33] Measurement of Joint Roughness Coefficient by Using Profilograph and Roughness Ruler附视频
    杜时贵
    胡云进
    胡晓飞
    [J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2009, (05) - 896
  • [34] ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL METHODOLOGIES FOR JOINT ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT DETERMINATION
    HSIUNG, SM
    GHOSH, A
    AHOLA, MP
    CHOWDHURY, AH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES & GEOMECHANICS ABSTRACTS, 1993, 30 (07) : 825 - 829
  • [36] Data-driven estimation of joint roughness coefficient
    Fathipour-Azar, Hadi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 13 (06) : 1428 - 1437
  • [37] Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness
    Belem, T
    Homand-Etienne, F
    Souley, M
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2000, 33 (04) : 217 - 242
  • [38] Quantitative Parameters for Rock Joint Surface Roughness
    T. Belem
    F. Homand-Etienne
    M. Souley
    [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2000, 33 : 217 - 242
  • [39] A Modified Correlation Between Roughness Parameter Z2 and the JRC
    Gao, Yanan
    Wong, Louis Ngai Yuen
    [J]. ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2015, 48 (01) : 387 - 396
  • [40] Effects of joint roughness and joint matching degree coefficient on stress wave propagation
    Yang, Jianming
    Qiao, Lan
    Li, Qingwen
    Li, Yuan
    Li, Miao
    [J]. Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019, 51 (11): : 194 - 200