Cross-cultural generalizability of the Personality and Role Identity Structural Model (PRISM): Implications for trait and cultural psychology

被引：10

作者：

Ching, Charles M. ^{[1
]}

Church, A. Timothy ^{[1
]}

Katigbak, Marcia S. ^{[1
]}

Locke, Kenneth D. ^{[2
]}

de Jesus Vargas-Flores, Jose ^{[3
]}

Ibanez-Reyes, Joselina ^{[3
]}

Morio, Hiroaki ^{[4
]}

Sun Wenmei

Mastor, Khairul A. ^{[5
]}

Roslan, Nurul A. ^{[5
]}

Zhang, Hengsheng ^{[6
]}

Shen, Jiliang ^{[6
]}

Alvarez, Juan M. ^{[1
]}

Ortiz, Fernando A. ^{[7
]}

机构：

[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Educ Leadership & Counseling Psychol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA

[2] Univ Idaho, Dept Psychol, Moscow, ID 83843 USA

[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Iztacala Natl Sch Profess Studies, Mexico City, DF, Mexico

[4] Kansai Univ, Fac Informat, Osaka, Japan

[5] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Ctr Gen Studies, Bangi 43600, Malaysia

[6] Beijing Normal Univ, Dept Dev & Educ Psychol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China

[7] Gonzaga Univ, Ctr Counseling, Spokane, WA 99258 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY | 2013年 / 47卷 / 06期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

Personality and Role Identity Structural Model; Traits; Cultural psychology; Contextualized trait measures; SELF-CONCEPT CONSISTENCY; SCALE SCORES; SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCY; INCREMENTAL VALIDITY; TESTING TRAIT; BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALISM; SATISFACTION; AUTHENTICITY; REPLICATION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.012

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

The cross-cultural generalizability of the Personality and Role Identity Structural Model (PRISM; Wood & Roberts, 2006) was tested in the United States, Mexico, Malaysia, China, and Japan. Participants rated their general and role identities, as defined by the PRISM, using Big Five trait adjectives, then rated their personality states (i.e., role experiences) in various roles in multiple daily interactions for 14 days. Structural predictions based on the PRISM were supported in all five cultures. Cultural differences were limited and did not reflect cultural differences in individualism-collectivism, dialecticism, or cultural tightness. The results supported the cross-cultural generalizability of the PRISM and the merits of contextualized trait measures in the prediction of role experiences. Implications for trait and cultural psychology are discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：894 / 907

页数：14

共 50 条

[31] The Ascent of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Berry, John W.
Lonner, Walter J.
Best, Deborah L.
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 53 (7-8) : 715 - 728
[32] Cross-cultural evolutionary psychology
Apicella, Coren L.
Barrett, H. Clark
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7 : 92 - 97
[33] Cross-cultural psychology in Germany
Helfrich, H
KEY ISSUES IN CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY: SELECTED PAPERS FROM THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, : 52 - 67
[34] Psychology of cross-cultural interactions
Sader, M
GRUPPENDYNAMIK-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 1997, 28 (03): : 323 - 326
[35] ON THE TEACHING OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY
SEGALL, MH
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 11 (01) : 89 - 99
[36] Cross-cultural psychology and development
Kagitcibasi, C
ASIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, : 42 - 49
[37] Cross-cultural health psychology
Berry, JW
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 4683 - 4683
[38] CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES IN PSYCHOLOGY
HOLTZMAN, WH
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 3 (02) : 83 - 91
[39] CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY
BRISLIN, RW
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 34 : 363 - 400
[40] Cross-cultural environmental psychology
Milfont, Taciano L.
Tam, Kim-Pong
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 54 : I - I

← 1 2 3 4 5 →