Cross-cultural generalizability of the Personality and Role Identity Structural Model (PRISM): Implications for trait and cultural psychology

被引:10
|
作者
Ching, Charles M. [1 ]
Church, A. Timothy [1 ]
Katigbak, Marcia S. [1 ]
Locke, Kenneth D. [2 ]
de Jesus Vargas-Flores, Jose [3 ]
Ibanez-Reyes, Joselina [3 ]
Morio, Hiroaki [4 ]
Sun Wenmei
Mastor, Khairul A. [5 ]
Roslan, Nurul A. [5 ]
Zhang, Hengsheng [6 ]
Shen, Jiliang [6 ]
Alvarez, Juan M. [1 ]
Ortiz, Fernando A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Educ Leadership & Counseling Psychol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Univ Idaho, Dept Psychol, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Iztacala Natl Sch Profess Studies, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] Kansai Univ, Fac Informat, Osaka, Japan
[5] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Ctr Gen Studies, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
[6] Beijing Normal Univ, Dept Dev & Educ Psychol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[7] Gonzaga Univ, Ctr Counseling, Spokane, WA 99258 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Personality and Role Identity Structural Model; Traits; Cultural psychology; Contextualized trait measures; SELF-CONCEPT CONSISTENCY; SCALE SCORES; SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCY; INCREMENTAL VALIDITY; TESTING TRAIT; BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALISM; SATISFACTION; AUTHENTICITY; REPLICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.012
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The cross-cultural generalizability of the Personality and Role Identity Structural Model (PRISM; Wood & Roberts, 2006) was tested in the United States, Mexico, Malaysia, China, and Japan. Participants rated their general and role identities, as defined by the PRISM, using Big Five trait adjectives, then rated their personality states (i.e., role experiences) in various roles in multiple daily interactions for 14 days. Structural predictions based on the PRISM were supported in all five cultures. Cultural differences were limited and did not reflect cultural differences in individualism-collectivism, dialecticism, or cultural tightness. The results supported the cross-cultural generalizability of the PRISM and the merits of contextualized trait measures in the prediction of role experiences. Implications for trait and cultural psychology are discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 907
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-cultural trait psychology
    McCrae, RR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 183 - 183
  • [2] CROSS-CULTURAL SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY
    TRIANDIS, HC
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1977, 3 (02) : 143 - 158
  • [3] The cross-cultural generalizability and validity of the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire
    Leone, L
    Van der Zee, KI
    van Oudenhoven, JP
    Perugini, M
    Ercolani, AP
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 38 (06) : 1449 - 1462
  • [4] The cross-cultural generalizability of personality types: A Philippine study
    Avdeyeva, TV
    Church, AT
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2005, 19 (06) : 475 - 499
  • [5] PERCEIVED TRUSTWORTHINESS OF OCCUPATIONS - PERSONALITY EFFECTS AND CROSS-CULTURAL GENERALIZABILITY
    CHUN, KT
    CAMPBELL, JB
    YOO, JH
    JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 6 (04) : 430 - 443
  • [6] Cultural identity of Kenyan tribes from cross-cultural psychology perspective
    Zhao, Xiaolin
    He, Gan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 33 : 4 - 4
  • [7] The cross-cultural generalizability of a new structural model of academic self-concepts
    Brunner, Martin
    Keller, Ulrich
    Hornung, Caroline
    Reichert, Monique
    Martin, Romain
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 19 (04) : 387 - 403
  • [8] The cross-cultural generalizability of Zuckerman's alternative five-factor model of personality
    Rossier, Jerome
    Aluja, Anton
    Garcia, Luis F.
    Angleitner, Alois
    De Pascalis, Vilfredo
    Wang, Wei
    Kuhlman, Michael
    Zuckerman, Marvin
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2007, 89 (02) : 188 - 196
  • [9] Test of the cross-cultural generalizability of a model of sexual harassment
    Wasti, SA
    Bergman, ME
    Glomb, TM
    Drasgow, F
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (05) : 766 - 778
  • [10] The interpretive turn: Implications for cross-cultural psychology
    Paranjpe, AC
    KEY ISSUES IN CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY: SELECTED PAPERS FROM THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, : 42 - 51