Is There an Allegiance Effect for Assessment Instruments? Actuarial Risk Assessment as an Exemplar

被引:44
|
作者
Blair, Pamela R.
Marcus, David K. [1 ]
Boccaccini, Marcus T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Mississippi, Dept Psychol, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA
[2] Sam Houston State Univ, Houston, TX USA
关键词
allegiance effect; meta-analysis; risk assessment; SORAG; Static-99; VRAG;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00147.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (Harris, Rice, & Quinsey, 1993), the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (Quinsey, Harris, Rice, & Cormier, 1998), and the Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 1999) are three well-researched risk measures. All three instruments were good predictors of recidivism (r = .31). However, these effect sizes were significantly larger in studies conducted by the instruments' authors (r = .37) than in studies conducted by independent researchers (r = .28). This allegiance effect remained significant even when the initial validation studies were excluded. No other design or sample characteristics were significant moderators of the relation between scores and recidivism. These findings raise questions about whether such an allegiance effect may be found for other measures.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 360
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Classification Accuracy of Actuarial Risk Assessment Instruments
    Neller, Daniel J.
    Frederick, Richard I.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2013, 31 (01) : 141 - 153
  • [2] Limits of actuarial risk assessment instruments for the search of truth in predictivity
    Thierry Hoang Pham
    Ducro, Claire
    Marghem, Benoit
    Reveillere, Christian
    Benezech, Michel
    [J]. ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2012, 170 (02): : 103 - 105
  • [3] Prospective Actuarial Risk Assessment A Comparison of Five Risk Assessment Instruments in Different Sexual Offender Subtypes
    Rettenberger, Martin
    Matthes, Anna
    Boer, Douglas P.
    Eher, Reinhard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2010, 54 (02) : 169 - 186
  • [4] Current Obstacles in Replicating Risk Assessment Findings: A Systematic Review of Commonly Used Actuarial Instruments
    Rossegger, Astrid
    Gerth, Juliane
    Seewald, Katharina
    Urbaniok, Frank
    Singh, Jay P.
    Endrass, Jerome
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2013, 31 (01) : 154 - 164
  • [5] Another Look at the (Im-)Precision of Individual Risk Estimates Made Using Actuarial Risk Assessment Instruments
    Hart, Stephen D.
    Cooke, David J.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2013, 31 (01) : 81 - 102
  • [6] The Actuarial Assessment and Experiential Reality of Risk in Childhood
    Madge, Nicola
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2009, 3 (05): : 824 - 835
  • [7] Actuarial support for the clinical assessment of violence risk
    Monahan, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 9 (2-3) : 167 - 169
  • [8] Evaluating the effectiveness of actuarial risk assessment models
    Baumann, DJ
    Law, JR
    Sheets, J
    Reid, G
    Graham, JC
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2005, 27 (05) : 465 - 490
  • [9] Actuarial risk assessment and human rights: A commentary
    Zinger, I
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2004, 46 (05) : 607 - 620
  • [10] Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders
    Harris, GT
    Rice, ME
    [J]. SEXUALLY COERCIVE BEHAVIOR: UNDERSTANDING AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 989 : 198 - 210