Screening interval recommendations following a normal colonoscopy in individuals with a familial risk of colorectal cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Plath, Jasper [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [1 ,4 ]
Guethlin, Corina [1 ]
Blumenstein, Irina [5 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Med Univ Graz, Inst Gen Practice & Evidence Based Hlth Serv Res, Auenbruggerpl 2-9, A-8036 Graz, Austria
[5] Univ Clin Frankfurt, Dept Gastroenterol, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE | 2018年 / 56卷 / 04期
关键词
colorectal neoplasms; familial risk; colonoscopy; surveillance; screening; GENERAL-PRACTICE; GUIDELINES; HISTORY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In view of the increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals with affected first-degree relatives (FDRs), the German evidence-based S3 guideline recommends having the first screening colonoscopy early and then, following a normal examination, repeating it at least every 10 years. The aim of this analysis was to explore colonoscopy interval recommendations in clinical practice among individuals aged < 55 years with a familial risk of CRC. Methods We analyzed data from the FRIDA. Frankfurt study. Patients aged 40 - 54 years with at least 1 reported FDR with CRC (excluding suspected/known hereditary cancer syndromes) and a normal colonoscopy result (no findings) were included. Data on colonoscopist recommendations for intervals between subsequent colonoscopies were extracted from colonoscopy reports. Results Of 63 reports of normal colonoscopies, 20 (32 %) did not include a recommendation on when to undergo a further colonoscopy. Of 43 reports with recommendations, 40 (93 %) suggested an interval that was shorter than the recommended maximum interval in the guideline: 1 (2 %) was for a 3-year interval, 37 (86 %) were for 5-year intervals, and 2 (5 %) were for 8-year intervals. Conclusions Although the low number of cases limits generalizability, the results indicate that recommended intervals in clinical practice are considerably shorter than the recommended maximum interval in the guideline.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:361 / 364
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Poor Knowledge of Personal and Familial Colorectal Cancer Risk and Screening Recommendations Associated with Advanced Colorectal Polyps
    Swati G. Patel
    Dennis J. Ahnen
    Amitha Gumidyala
    Jeannine Espinoza
    Andrew Nicklawsky
    Junxiao Hu
    Derek Smith
    Jan Lowery
    Gregory Austin
    Myles Cockburn
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2020, 65 : 2542 - 2550
  • [22] Poor Knowledge of Personal and Familial Colorectal Cancer Risk and Screening Recommendations Associated with Advanced Colorectal Polyps
    Patel, Swati G.
    Ahnen, Dennis J.
    Gumidyala, Amitha
    Espinoza, Jeannine
    Nicklawsky, Andrew
    Hu, Junxiao
    Smith, Derek
    Lowery, Jan
    Austin, Gregory
    Cockburn, Myles
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2020, 65 (09) : 2542 - 2550
  • [23] Negative screening colonoscopy and long-term colorectal cancer risk-is it time to extend the screening interval?
    Ijspeert, J. E. G.
    van Leerdam, M. E.
    LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 9 (07): : 584 - 585
  • [24] Familial colorectal cancer risk: ESMO Clinical Recommendations
    Vasen, H. F. A.
    van der Meulen-de Jong, A. E.
    Cappel, W. H. de Vos Tot Nederveen
    Oliveira, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 : 51 - 53
  • [25] Adherence to Guideline-Appropriate Recommendations After Normal CRC Screening Colonoscopy in Average-Risk Individuals
    Aneese, Andrew
    Edhi, Ahmed
    Imam, Zaid
    Schoenfeld, Philip
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S133 - S133
  • [26] Interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program
    van de Schootbrugge-vandermeer, Hilliene J.
    Kooyker, Arthur I.
    Wisse, Pieter H. A.
    Nagtegaal, Iris D.
    Geuzinge, Hiltje A.
    Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
    de Jonge, Lucie
    Breekveldt, Emilie C. H.
    van Vuuren, Anneke J.
    van Kemenade, Folkert J.
    Ramakers, Christian R. B.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Spaander, Manon C. W.
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (12) : 1061 - 1069
  • [27] Equivalency of Fecal Immunochemical Tests and Colonoscopy in Familial Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Quintero, Enrique
    Carrillo, Marta
    Gimeno-Garcia, Antonio Z.
    Hernandez-Guerra, Manuel
    Nicolas-Perez, David
    Alonso-Abreu, Inmaculada
    Luisa Diez-Fuentes, Maria
    Abraira, Victor
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 147 (05) : 1021 - +
  • [28] Impact of Bowel Preparation on Surveillance Colonoscopy Interval for Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Singhal, Shashideep
    Mathur, Siddharth
    Basi, Putneet S.
    Kanaparthi, Chethana
    Butt, Amir S.
    Singh, Manpreet
    Momeni, Mojdeh
    Anand, Sury
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB128 - AB128
  • [29] Risk of post colonoscopy colorectal cancer following screening colonoscopy with low-risk or no adenomas: A population-based study
    Nielsen, Jesper Clausen
    Ploug, Magnus
    Baatrup, Gunnar
    Kroijer, Rasmus
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (11) : 2932 - 2936
  • [30] Familial risk and diagnosis of colorectal cancer in young individuals
    Pavel Elsakov
    Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 13 (Suppl 1)