Undrained seismic response of tunnels

被引:0
|
作者
Sandoval, E. A. [1 ]
Bobet, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valle, Cali, Colombia
[2] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1201/9780429321559-51
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The seismic response of tunnels has been well-studied for structures placed in linear-elastic ground, but the results may be only applicable to tunnels placed in stiff soil or for moderate earthquakes. There is little information regarding the behavior of buried structures in soft soils, since they do not show a linear behavior, and for undrained conditions, where excess pore pressures accumulate during the earthquake. The paper presents the results of two-dimensional dynamic numerical analyses, under drained or undrained loading, to assess the seismic response of deep circular tunnels located far from the seismic source. It is assumed that the liner remains elastic and that the ground response can be approximated with a nonlinear elastoplastic constitutive model that includes excess pore pressures accumulation with cycles of loading. The liner deformations and load demand strongly depend on the flexibility ratio, F, which is a measure of the relative stiffness between the ground and the tunnel. Undrained conditions, compared with drained conditions, tend to reduce deformations for flexible liners and increase them for stiff tunnels early during the earthquake. With further cycles of loading, as the excess pore pressures increase, the differences in tunnel distortions between drained and undrained loading are reduced, i.e., they increase for flexible and decrease for stiff tunnels. Undrained loading, for stiff tunnels with F < 2, produces larger thrust in the liner than drained loading. For more flexible tunnels, with F > 2, the behavior is the opposite: smaller axial forces for undrained loading. For tunnels with F > 2, the bending moments in the liner are not affected by the type of loading, drained or undrained, or by the magnitude of the excess pore pressures. For tunnels with F < 2, the bending moments increase from drained to undrained loading and with the magnitude of excess pore pressures.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic response of undersea tunnels to hydrodynamic and hydrostatic pressures
    Liu, Yong
    Chen, Guo-Xing
    Kong, Meng-Yun
    Chen, G.-X., 2013, Chinese Society of Civil Engineering (35): : 357 - 362
  • [22] Assessment of the Seismic Response of Shallow Buried Elliptical Tunnels
    Zhou, Hao
    He, Changdi
    Wang, Xiao
    Chen, Yuanjun
    Li, Jing
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 27 (03) : 465 - 487
  • [23] Seismic response analysis of mountain tunnels in different depths
    Jiang, S.-P. (jiangshuping@cmhk.com), 1600, Academia Sinica (35):
  • [24] Seismic response of operational tunnels to earthquakes with foreshocks or aftershocks
    Lee, Junyoung
    Ahn, Jae-Kwang
    Kim, Byungmin
    GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 38 (06) : 621 - 631
  • [25] Seismic response analysis of mountain tunnels in different depths
    Jiang Shu-ping
    Fang Lin
    Lin Zhi
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2014, 35 (01) : 211 - +
  • [26] Investigation of the response of bored tunnels to seismic fault movement
    Tsiripidou, K.
    Georgiadis, K.
    NUMERICAL METHODS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING IX, VOL 2, 2018, : 1345 - 1352
  • [27] Influence of the surrounding rock state to the seismic response of tunnels
    Xu, W.
    Qiu, W.
    ROCK DYNAMICS AND APPLICATIONS - STATE OF THE ART, 2013, : 481 - 486
  • [28] Elastoplastic analysis of the seismic response of tunnels in soft soils
    Shahrour, I.
    Khoshnoudian, F.
    Sadek, M.
    Mroueh, H.
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 25 (04) : 478 - 482
  • [29] On the Seismic Response of Anchoring Elements for Submerged Floating Tunnels
    Corazza, S.
    Geuzaine, M.
    Foti, F.
    Denoel, V.
    Martinelli, L.
    DYNAMICS AND AERODYNAMICS OF CABLES, ISDAC 2023, 2024, 399 : 303 - 313
  • [30] Seismic response analysis of shield tunnels in liquefiable soils
    Zhu T.
    Wang R.
    Zhang J.-M.
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41 : 57 - 60