Undrained seismic response of tunnels

被引:0
|
作者
Sandoval, E. A. [1 ]
Bobet, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valle, Cali, Colombia
[2] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1201/9780429321559-51
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The seismic response of tunnels has been well-studied for structures placed in linear-elastic ground, but the results may be only applicable to tunnels placed in stiff soil or for moderate earthquakes. There is little information regarding the behavior of buried structures in soft soils, since they do not show a linear behavior, and for undrained conditions, where excess pore pressures accumulate during the earthquake. The paper presents the results of two-dimensional dynamic numerical analyses, under drained or undrained loading, to assess the seismic response of deep circular tunnels located far from the seismic source. It is assumed that the liner remains elastic and that the ground response can be approximated with a nonlinear elastoplastic constitutive model that includes excess pore pressures accumulation with cycles of loading. The liner deformations and load demand strongly depend on the flexibility ratio, F, which is a measure of the relative stiffness between the ground and the tunnel. Undrained conditions, compared with drained conditions, tend to reduce deformations for flexible liners and increase them for stiff tunnels early during the earthquake. With further cycles of loading, as the excess pore pressures increase, the differences in tunnel distortions between drained and undrained loading are reduced, i.e., they increase for flexible and decrease for stiff tunnels. Undrained loading, for stiff tunnels with F < 2, produces larger thrust in the liner than drained loading. For more flexible tunnels, with F > 2, the behavior is the opposite: smaller axial forces for undrained loading. For tunnels with F > 2, the bending moments in the liner are not affected by the type of loading, drained or undrained, or by the magnitude of the excess pore pressures. For tunnels with F < 2, the bending moments increase from drained to undrained loading and with the magnitude of excess pore pressures.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seismic Response of Undrained Twin Tunnels
    Ouadfel, K.
    Messast, S.
    Boulfoul, K.
    JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE, 2022, 58 (02) : 192 - 201
  • [2] Seismic Response of Undrained Twin Tunnels
    K. Ouadfel
    S. Messast
    K. Boulfoul
    Journal of Mining Science, 2022, 58 : 192 - 201
  • [3] The undrained seismic response of the Daikai Station
    Sandoval, Eimar
    Bobet, Antonio
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 103
  • [4] Undrained Seismic Stability of Dual Unsupported Circular Tunnels Subjected to Surcharge Loading
    Zhang, Rui
    Wu, Gaoqiao
    Zhao, Minghua
    Lei, Ming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2021, 21 (02)
  • [5] Three-dimensional seismic face stability of shield tunnels in undrained clay
    Davoodi, Milad
    Senent, Salvador
    Keshavarz, Amin
    Jimenez, Rafael
    UNDERGROUND SPACE, 2024, 15 : 26 - 43
  • [6] Seismic Response of Underground and Floating Tunnels
    Rodriguez-Castellanos, Alejandro
    Martinez-Calzada, Victor
    Ibarra-Pena, Fabian
    Pineda-Leon, Ernesto
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 179 (03) : 973 - 992
  • [7] Seismic Response of Underground and Floating Tunnels
    Alejandro Rodríguez-Castellanos
    Víctor Martínez-Calzada
    Fabian Ibarra-Peña
    Ernesto Pineda-León
    Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2022, 179 : 973 - 992
  • [8] Undrained stability of tall tunnels
    Wilson, D. W.
    Abbo, A. J.
    Sloan, S. W.
    COMPUTER METHODS AND RECENT ADVANCES IN GEOMECHANICS, 2015, : 447 - 452
  • [9] Research on Crossing Tunnels’ Seismic Response Characteristics
    Cong Liu
    Li-min Peng
    Ming-feng Lei
    Yu-feng Li
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23 : 4910 - 4920
  • [10] EFFECT OF ADJOINING STRUCTURES ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF TUNNELS
    NAVARRO, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 1992, 16 (11) : 797 - 814