Ex Vivo Dermoscopy for Biobank-Oriented Sampling of Melanoma

被引:10
|
作者
Malvehy, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Aguilera, Paula [1 ]
Carrera, Cristina [1 ]
Salerni, Gabriel [1 ]
Lovatto, Louise [1 ]
Scope, Alon [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Marghoob, Ashfaq A. [3 ]
Palou, Josep [1 ,6 ]
Alos, Llucia [6 ]
Puig, Susana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi i Sunyer, Dept Dermatol, Melanoma Unit, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[2] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Raras, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dermatol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Dermatol, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[6] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi i Sunyer, Dept Pathol, Melanoma Unit, Barcelona 08036, Spain
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CHLORIDE FILM; DIAGNOSIS; ERROR;
D O I
10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4724
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE In the era of targeted therapy for cancer, translational research identifying molecular targets in melanoma offers novel opportunities for potential new treatments. OBJECTIVES To describe a method for sampling fresh tissue from primary melanoma and to test whether the area of maximal thickness can be identified with dermoscopy to ensure it remains available for routine histopathological diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Tumors clinically suspicious for melanoma with diameter exceeding 5 mm were included. Dermoscopy-guided sampling was performed using a 2-mm to 3-mm punch through not the thickest part of the tumor. In vivo and ex vivo dermoscopic images obtained were available to the diagnosing pathologist. Melanoma samples were obtained in a referral melanoma unit. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES In study 1, Breslow thickness in 10 melanomas was compared between sampled tissue and the remaining specimen to confirm that the area of maximal thickness remained available for the histopathological diagnosis. In study 2, forty-three additional melanomas were sampled for biobanking prospectively. Agreement between 2 independent observers on dermoscopic identification of the thickest part of the melanoma was studied. RESULTS In study 1, the area of maximal Breslow thickness in all 10 melanomas was not sampled and remained in the main specimen. In study 2, sampling was performed by one of the investigators. Concordance was 93% between 2 independent observers for the dermoscopic selection of the thickest portion of the melanoma. Pathologists asserted that the sampling procedure did not compromise their ability to evaluate melanoma specimens. A limitation is that this is a single-center study. Each case required joint evaluation by expert dermoscopists and dermatopathologists. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In applying the dermoscopy-guided sampling protocol, we make the following 5 recommendations: Samples should only be obtained from areas that will not interfere with the pathologist's diagnosis and prognostic information. Sampling should not be obtained from tumors for which one suspects that the histopathological evaluation may prove difficult. Sampling should not be performed on small melanomas; we recommend a minimum diameter of 10 mm. All the dermoscopy-guided sampling should be documented with images, available to pathologists and clinicians, and reflected in the pathology report. Finally, the frozen biobank samples should be made available for routine hematoxylin-eosin histopathological evaluation until the final pathology report is produced. Ex vivo dermoscopy may serve to guide the procurement of small samples from primary melanoma for fresh tissue biobanking without compromising the histopathological evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1060 / 1067
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In vivo and ex vivo proton MR spectroscopy of primary and secondary melanoma
    Bourne, RM
    Stanwell, P
    Stretch, JR
    Scolyer, RA
    Thompson, JF
    Mountford, CE
    Lean, CL
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 53 (03) : 506 - 513
  • [22] In vivo and ex vivo confocal microscopy of eyelid melanoma: case report
    Haouas, M.
    Guillemot, C.
    Grivet, D.
    Cinotti, E.
    Perrot, J. L.
    Labeille, B.
    Cambazard, F.
    Forest, F.
    Dumollard, J. M.
    Peoch, M.
    Gain, P.
    Thuret, G.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2014, 92
  • [23] In Vivo and Ex Vivo MR Imaging of Slowly Cycling Melanoma Cells
    Magnitsky, S.
    Roesch, A.
    Herlyn, M.
    Glickson, J. D.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2011, 66 (05) : 1362 - 1373
  • [24] Assessment of the Chemosensitivity of Uveal Melanoma Cells Ex Vivo
    S. V. Saakyan
    А. Yu. Tsygankov
    N. I. Moiseeva
    А. F. Karamysheva
    D. D. Garri
    Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2020, 170 : 142 - 147
  • [25] Ex vivo sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs in uveal melanoma
    Cree, IA
    Myatt, N
    Foss, AJE
    Hungerford, JL
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1997, 182 : A5 - A5
  • [26] Ex vivo distribution of gold nanoparticles in choroidal melanoma
    Kanavi, Mozhgan Rezaei
    Asadi, Somayeh
    Ahmadieh, Hamid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE, 2017, 12 : 8527 - 8529
  • [27] Comparison of the ex vivo chemosensitivity of uveal and cutaneous melanoma
    Neale, MH
    Myatt, NE
    Khoury, GG
    Weaver, P
    Lamont, A
    Hungerford, JL
    Kurbacher, CM
    Hall, P
    Corrie, PG
    Cree, IA
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2001, 11 (06) : 601 - 609
  • [28] Assessment of the Chemosensitivity of Uveal Melanoma Cells Ex Vivo
    Saakyan, S. V.
    Tsygankov, A. Yu.
    Moiseeva, N. I.
    Karamysheva, A. F.
    Garri, D. D.
    BULLETIN OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 170 (01) : 142 - 147
  • [29] Dermoscopy: Ex vivo visualization of fleas head and bag of eggs confirms the diagnosis of Tungiasis
    Dunn, Rebecca
    Asher, Ruth
    Bowling, Jonathan
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 53 (02) : 120 - 122
  • [30] Vertical plane ex vivo dermoscopy: a novel dermoscopic technique. A preliminary study
    Maia, Marcus
    Amadio, Camila Ribeiro
    Morales, Andrezza Garcia
    Lellis, Rute Facchini
    ANAIS BRASILEIROS DE DERMATOLOGIA, 2018, 93 (06) : 899 - 901